Teddy gets offerred a week for rough conduct - CLEARED

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Triple B
    Formerly 'BBB'
    • Feb 2003
    • 6999

    #31
    Gilbee was running directly away from me, so that is the first time I have seen the actual contact. Seriously, that is not suspension worthy in the least...
    Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

    Comment

    • aardvark
      Veterans List
      • Mar 2010
      • 5685

      #32
      What a load of rubbish, a week for that is just unbelievable.

      Comment

      • ugg
        Can you feel it?
        Site Admin
        • Jan 2003
        • 15970

        #33
        If I was Ted's legal rep I would argue

        Ted peeled off his man to attack the loose ball
        He expected Gilbee to take possession but whe Gilbee knocked the ball on, Ted slowed up and all he did was brace for contact given the momentum of both players.
        If he wanted to really hurt Gilbee, he wouldn't have slowed down and could have really done some damage
        Reserves live updates (Twitter)
        Reserves WIKI -
        Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

        Comment

        • Moose Malloy
          On the Rookie List
          • Mar 2006
          • 6

          #34
          Yes it's the inconsistency that is incredibly annoying. Last year Dawson knocked Kennelly into the middle of next week, probably deliberately given his recent exploits, but at least negligently, and nothing happened to him.

          Comment

          • DST
            The voice of reason!
            • Jan 2003
            • 2705

            #35
            Originally posted by Doctor
            I remember the bump. The commentators at the time said there was nothing in it. My recollection is that it wasn't even deemed worthy of a free kick. To get a week for that would be an absolute joke. Not only was the contact unavoidable, but it makes the umpire look like a goose for not giving a free when he was, in fact, correct all along.

            We'll probably accept the week but we should fight it. There was absolutely nothing wrong with what Richards did IMO.
            A free kick was paid, but I can't remember if the Dogs decided to play on or not but a free kick was paid for the bump.

            DST
            "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

            Comment

            • ugg
              Can you feel it?
              Site Admin
              • Jan 2003
              • 15970

              #36
              Originally posted by DST

              A free kick was paid, but I can't remember if the Dogs decided to play on or not but a free kick was paid for the bump.

              DST

              Trengove offered two weeks - AFL.com.au


              About 61 seconds in.

              No free kick was paid, you can see the controlling umpire Meredith right in the centre of the picture and he doesn't make a signal.
              Reserves live updates (Twitter)
              Reserves WIKI -
              Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

              Comment

              • lwoggardner
                Warming the Bench
                • Aug 2005
                • 141

                #37
                Just to up the outrage - the MRP assessed this as worthy of a *two* week suspension. Ridiculous. Ted gets it down to 1 with early plea/good record.

                Comment

                • Triple B
                  Formerly 'BBB'
                  • Feb 2003
                  • 6999

                  #38
                  What time should we hear that the Swans are contesting this BS ??
                  Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

                  Comment

                  • ugg
                    Can you feel it?
                    Site Admin
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 15970

                    #39
                    The deadline was 11am. News should filter through soon.
                    Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                    Reserves WIKI -
                    Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                    Comment

                    • top40
                      Regular in the Side
                      • May 2007
                      • 933

                      #40
                      I accept the injustice of the MRP's decision. However, there is also the risk of Ted being out for two weeks and missing the game against Hawthorn and thereafter lacking match fitness.

                      No disrepect to Port Adelaide, but is it worth the risk? (Actually there is disrepect to Port)

                      Comment

                      • ugg
                        Can you feel it?
                        Site Admin
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 15970

                        #41
                        We are contesting!
                        Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                        Reserves WIKI -
                        Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                        Comment

                        • CJK
                          Human
                          • Apr 2006
                          • 2170

                          #42
                          Stick it to The Man!
                          -

                          Comment

                          • Untamed Snark
                            Senior Player
                            • Feb 2011
                            • 1375

                            #43
                            I think we can count on Ted to do everything possible to maintain match fitness should he get stuck with the ban.
                            I'm torn between knowing it should be contested due to being a ridiculous decision and not trusting the MRP to make a good decision.
                            We can manage against Port but I think we will need Ted against the Hawks
                            Chillin' with the strange Quarks

                            Comment

                            • Triple B
                              Formerly 'BBB'
                              • Feb 2003
                              • 6999

                              #44
                              Seriously the only option, it's just such an unjust penalty.

                              Given we must lodge an amount (10K?) to appeal which is withheld if the appeal is deemed frivolous, the tribunal should fine the MRP for wasting their time with a frivolous suspension.
                              Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

                              Comment

                              • 31 hard at it
                                Regular in the Side
                                • Mar 2008
                                • 550

                                #45
                                Ted has an outstanding record for courage and fair play.
                                This is a shocking decision by the MRP to even lay a charge when both players were aware, ball within the play, Gilbee stands rather than be tackled with the ball and the hit was a side bump to the shoulder of the oncoming player !

                                All we ask is give Ted a fair go !!

                                Comment

                                Working...