Interesting discussion - i see both sides. I think it depends on what we consider an "asset" to be. On the one hand i see TheBloods' point.. we are giving something to get something, often late picks, and that is the range where we have found some of our very best champions over the years, so it is true that in matching certain bids for future stars we may be unknowingly costing ourselves certain other future stars.. & also.. it does seem ironic to call something that is designed to give us a fighting chance in a draft system that so heavily favours the traditional footy states an "advantage".
On the other hand.. a simple definition of "asset" reads: "a useful or valuable thing or person". So the good people of RWO calling our ability to secure academy talents an asset are spot on.. i would not go so far as to say it is an advantage but it is certainly 'useful' to be able to watch these lads from the time they are 10, 11 years old and develop them from within.. to have that confidence in who the player is at the time of drafting.. the 'valuable' part comes once they are Swans players.. not wanting to leave NSW and being dedicated and loyal to the Swans.. almost can't put a price on that!!
CHEER CHEER
On the other hand.. a simple definition of "asset" reads: "a useful or valuable thing or person". So the good people of RWO calling our ability to secure academy talents an asset are spot on.. i would not go so far as to say it is an advantage but it is certainly 'useful' to be able to watch these lads from the time they are 10, 11 years old and develop them from within.. to have that confidence in who the player is at the time of drafting.. the 'valuable' part comes once they are Swans players.. not wanting to leave NSW and being dedicated and loyal to the Swans.. almost can't put a price on that!!
CHEER CHEER


Comment