Mega merged trading thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NeonBible
    Warming the Bench
    • Mar 2021
    • 280

    Interesting discussion - i see both sides. I think it depends on what we consider an "asset" to be. On the one hand i see TheBloods' point.. we are giving something to get something, often late picks, and that is the range where we have found some of our very best champions over the years, so it is true that in matching certain bids for future stars we may be unknowingly costing ourselves certain other future stars.. & also.. it does seem ironic to call something that is designed to give us a fighting chance in a draft system that so heavily favours the traditional footy states an "advantage".

    On the other hand.. a simple definition of "asset" reads: "a useful or valuable thing or person". So the good people of RWO calling our ability to secure academy talents an asset are spot on.. i would not go so far as to say it is an advantage but it is certainly 'useful' to be able to watch these lads from the time they are 10, 11 years old and develop them from within.. to have that confidence in who the player is at the time of drafting.. the 'valuable' part comes once they are Swans players.. not wanting to leave NSW and being dedicated and loyal to the Swans.. almost can't put a price on that!!

    CHEER CHEER

    Comment

    • Goal Sneak
      Out of Bounds on the Full
      • Jun 2006
      • 653

      Even though there is no chance of "go home" factor for an academy player, it doesn't mean they won't leave for other reasons. Players move interstate to be with partners or some may want all the attention that comes with being an AFL footballer in Melbourne. Not to mention the threat of a club throwing serious money around. The Swans had to pay big money to hold onto Heeney last negotiations due to offers from other clubs. It's not implausible that he might leave. I'm just not sure exactly how much loyalty has been garnered through the academy, we'll find out over the next few years.

      Comment

      • Ruck'n'Roll
        Ego alta, ergo ictus
        • Nov 2003
        • 3990

        Mitch Clark, pulled the go home card on Brisbane, only to end up in Melbourne. The pull of Melournes Big Clubs is considerable.

        I also recall that we had to pay big to fend of North in particular regarding Heeney, so although we havent had any academy departures it might be concievable.

        Comment

        • Aprilbr
          Senior Player
          • Oct 2016
          • 1803

          Originally posted by Ruck'n'Roll
          Mitch Clark, pulled the go home card on Brisbane, only to end up in Melbourne. The pull of Melournes Big Clubs is considerable.

          I also recall that we had to pay big to fend of North in particular regarding Heeney, so although we havent had any academy departures it might be concievable.
          I agree with all of this. Heeney, Mills etc are likely to stay but if they get offered much more elsewhere then who knows? Sydney also suffers from a cost of living perception even though its a great city to live in. The same clubs that pushed for the cost of living allowance to be removed use cost of living as a key plank in their efforts to poach our (and GWS) players.

          Comment

          • mcs
            Travelling Swannie!!
            • Jul 2007
            • 8161

            Originally posted by Aprilbr
            I agree with all of this. Heeney, Mills etc are likely to stay but if they get offered much more elsewhere then who knows? Sydney also suffers from a cost of living perception even though its a great city to live in. The same clubs that pushed for the cost of living allowance to be removed use cost of living as a key plank in their efforts to poach our (and GWS) players.
            Of course academy doesn't remove completely the 'might go elsewhere factor'. But nothing ever can - and surely the academy will minimise that risk.

            More broadly, more on draft than trading (but threads all mixed up a bit at the moment), was interesting to read the premiership club update from Kinnear Beatson today - copied below for people that haven't seen. Gives a really neat insight to our thinking on draft night this year - as a few on here suspected, we weren't sold on the key position players available at our picks.

            Every recruiter gets excited about the new players they draft. It’s a new era commencing, and time will tell and judge whether they’ve been good selections or not. There’s a lot that they have to confront, and it’s a huge challenge to any player stepping up to AFL level. It’s a very demanding, challenging environment both physically and mentally. Most of these young men are very young, they’ve just completed year 12, they’ve barely spent any time away from home – so there’s a lot that they have to deal with, but it’s an exciting time ahead for all of them and for the club.

            Overall, we’re pleased with how we went in the 2021 Draft. We would have liked to have picked up another key position player, but our philosophy with key position players is that there’s no point taking them if they don’t look good enough to play at the elite level. It always looks good on paper, but if they’re not up to the elite level there’s no point.

            We didn’t feel during the draft there were key position players available to us that were significantly better than the midfielders available, thus we continued to go down the track of recruiting midfielders that can play other roles as well. You can never have too many midfielders, and it puts pressures on the existing ones which is what you want.

            We picked up West Australian Angus Sheldrick on night one at pick 18, and he was a player that we had been keeping an eye on since he emerged mid-season. He wasn’t initially in the Under 18 Academy Hub, but through his performances with Claremont they included him in that squad and from then on his performances for both WA and for Claremont just continued to develop really strongly, including a really promising performance WAFL Colts Grand Final against Swan Districts.

            The pleasing thing about Angus is he primarily is an inside-mid, a left footer, and his main asset is his explosiveness away from the stoppages and his ability to win contested ball. A couple of times throughout 2021 he also showed his ability to push forward and kick goals for both Claremont and WA. What was impressive was when he was playing for Claremont and he got a severely corked thigh, he pushed forward and kicked three goals in the last quarter which was a pretty good effort given he doesn’t normally play that role. We think he’ll break into the team through midfield, but he also has the potential to play as a small forward.

            It’s disappointing not to be able to get our West Australian draftees over here to Sydney to get settled in, but while the WA hard borders are in place with NSW it’s just not a possibility. Fortunately Angus and Corey Warner are over there with Chad Warner and Loga McDonald, who have had at least a year in the system, know what’s involved and will be able to guide them through some pre-season training over there. They’re due back after Christmas so they’ll get involved then.

            Matthew Roberts is another left footer. He had an interesting year last year playing Colts, Reserves and Seniors for South Adelaide. Roberts also had to combine that with school and college football at St Peters, and then representing South Australia in the National Under 18s. The thing about Matty is he’s a good decision maker with the ball, and he has a good left foot kick, he can play multiple roles inside or outside midfield, but he also showed us at senior level that he can play as a high half forward. In reserves, he also showed he could play across half back and use his kicking as a weapon there.

            Lachlan Rankin’s greatest asset is his decision making with the ball in hand and also his kicking. He’s a little lighter in his frame, so he’ll take a bit of time to put on the required body mass but he could play wing, half back, high half forward as well on those outside roles where you need good ball users.

            Corey Warner is a midfielder like his brother Chad, but he plays more outside on the wing. Out of the four draftees, he would be the best athlete for speed and endurance, his running capacity is really good. The area that he needs to concentrate on is the use of the ball and the decision making. He’s a tremendous runner and if he’s anything like Chad, which he is, we’re confident he’ll knuckle down and do the work to improve in the areas where he’s a bit deficient in the moment.

            At the end of the day, where these guys play really depends on what opportunities arise, and also what form they’re showing. I’m really excited about the potential of this group of young Drafts in 2022, and look forward to seeing what impact they have on the club.
            "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

            Comment

            • bloodspirit
              Clubman
              • Apr 2015
              • 4448

              Thanks very much for posting that, mcs. I, for one, hadn't seen it and have been hankering to hear KB speak about our draftees. So far there's really only been the video from Dalrymple (which was fine) and some comments KB made after the first round when we had only taken Sheldrick. There's nothing especially newsworthy there but still interested to read their thoughts.
              All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

              Comment

              Working...