Changes for Rnd 10 v The Doggies

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Swansinger
    Senior Player
    • Mar 2003
    • 1099

    #16
    Two goals regardless , it is time to give young Sam a rest . Jesse should have been in for him last week.

    Comment

    • Bloodmaniac
      On the Rookie List
      • Sep 2008
      • 23

      #17
      Johnny Longmire, pick Nipper please.
      "First understand, then criticize; not the other way round!"

      Comment

      • longmile
        Crumber
        • Apr 2011
        • 3360

        #18
        Out: Walsh, LRT and AJ
        In: Morton, Mumford (if ready) and Armstrong
        TDL to start

        If not Mumford bring in Seaby. Maybe Spanger instead of Morton
        Last edited by longmile; 27 May 2012, 11:33 AM.

        Comment

        • Swansinger
          Senior Player
          • Mar 2003
          • 1099

          #19
          Originally posted by swansprincess

          Re :
          Seems fair for Walsh to be dropped after not doing anything last night......

          coupled with :
          .... why should Walsh be the one to get the drop

          and :
          Spangher in for someone, probably unfortunate Walsh..
          The matter of leaving out Walsh seemed to be a rhetorical question ,yet you still say he should be dropped.
          Why ?

          I'd keep the lad in.

          Comment

          • The Big Cat
            On the veteran's list
            • Apr 2006
            • 2349

            #20
            Welcome to the Tigers' site ....... oh sorry .... it's the Swans' site. I just thought supporters eating their own meant ..... oh sorry.
            Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

            Comment

            • aardvark
              Veterans List
              • Mar 2010
              • 5685

              #21
              Originally posted by The Big Cat
              Welcome to the Tigers' site ....... oh sorry .... it's the Swans' site. I just thought supporters eating their own meant ..... oh sorry.
              You obviously haven't been to the Tigers site today

              Comment

              • MattW
                Veterans List
                • May 2011
                • 4195

                #22
                We need confidence, experience, and competitiveness in the forward line. So, Spangher for Walsh.

                I think Armstrong for Malceski is on the cards at some point. Also wouldn't mind seeing Cunningham as specialist sub - perhaps for Bird.

                We look really one paced at the moment; the loss of Rohan has been considerable. We might need to take risks to overcome it.

                Comment

                • The Big Cat
                  On the veteran's list
                  • Apr 2006
                  • 2349

                  #23
                  Originally posted by aardvark
                  You obviously haven't been to the Tigers site today
                  Just wait!
                  Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

                  Comment

                  • lwjoyner
                    Regular in the Side
                    • Nov 2004
                    • 942

                    #24
                    a few need to be looked at. AJ not just because of injury his decision making since he came in has been poor has has his kicking most times. Bird is anothe rwho has struggled played well early in season,Shaw must be close to being replaced he too struggles with decisions LRT is not a fwd or ruck let him play at CHB at shut down a man as he did early in his career, NM is struggling jees for what its worth a lot are. Its disappointing that one week we play alright the next no. But please dont just recycle like AE. Maybe its time for JMoore to be given a chance. Not quick but smart and hard at it seems to be among the best every week in the reserves.

                    Comment

                    • swansprincess
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Jun 2011
                      • 306

                      #25
                      Originally posted by Swansinger
                      The matter of leaving out Walsh seemed to be a rhetorical question ,yet you still say he should be dropped.
                      Why ?

                      I'd keep the lad in.
                      The first point was completely sarcastic. I do not think Walsh should be dropped, but I think he will be because the coaches seem to so against dropping reid.
                      For mine, it would be Spangher in, Reid OUT
                      and depending on injuries, Mummy, Armstrong and Nipper in. For LRT, AJ and anyone else.

                      Comment

                      • swansprincess
                        On the Rookie List
                        • Jun 2011
                        • 306

                        #26
                        Originally posted by O'Reilly
                        We need confidence, experience, and competitiveness in the forward line. So, Spangher for Walsh.
                        Based on this, Reid should be dropped straight away then. He has no confidence, not much experience (not when it comes to kicking goals anyway) and is not competitive. Walsh had one bad game of 2, Sam's had countless pathetic performances.

                        I do like your suggestion of cunningham though, he's quick and would surely offer more than any 'forward' we have now.

                        Comment

                        • wolftone57
                          Veterans List
                          • Aug 2008
                          • 5835

                          #27
                          Mal, AJ (injured looked like a long term to me), Shaw, love to drop Macca , he was soft and played for frees all night, but it won't happen. Welcome to the Australian Cricket Team!

                          In Spang, Tommy to second ruck, Harry and Mitch. LRT to the back line. There may be a problem with Harry as he replaced Brown on the list and he comes back this week. Are they going to list him again in place of Rohan or go for Shane Biggs as he is in the best players in the reserves every week. I don't quit know the rule here but I was of the opinion that because Brown came back Harry automatically goes back to the rooky list. Maybe Liz, Scott, Cheer Squad, Ugg or Al will know better.

                          Comment

                          • ugg
                            Can you feel it?
                            Site Admin
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 15961

                            #28
                            Rohan was placed on the long term injury list on Friday with no replacement nominated yet.
                            Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                            Reserves WIKI -
                            Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                            Comment

                            • wolftone57
                              Veterans List
                              • Aug 2008
                              • 5835

                              #29
                              Bugger it bring Mitchell in and play him off the bench he has played 70 min at Two's level and should really have another game there but WTF I think he would be good. He is strong and slippery.

                              Comment

                              • wolftone57
                                Veterans List
                                • Aug 2008
                                • 5835

                                #30
                                Originally posted by ugg
                                Rohan was placed on the long term injury list on Friday with no replacement nominated yet.
                                I know we can nominate someone to replace him Ugg but is Harry precluded because he has already been a replacement? If AJ has broken his arm that will be at least 6 weeks so he will be on the long term injury list too.

                                Comment

                                Working...