As a natural contrarian, I love Matt80. On this one, he's gone completely bonkers, but keep it up buddy. The more original thinking up for debate, the better.
We've had enough McGuire!
Collapse
X
-
-
-
You people are being short sighted. Eddie is winning against the Swans. He has won the Cola, banned recruitment and the academy's are next.
The AFL community, the AFL commission and the media are backing Eddie. The Hawks are good mates with Eddie and no one is raising an eyelid on Frawley or O'Rourke.
It's to bring Eddie into the tent and nullify him. Forgiveness and friendship from Adam will be warmly received from Eddie and he will lay off the Swans to keep building a bridge with Adam.
This is a pragmatic decision in the best interests of the football club.
You people feel better when you bash Eddie, but you are only hurting your Football Club. It's time to get pragmatic, it's time to have a cease fire on Eddie and it's time to make Eddie a friend of our club like the Hawks have done.
This is in the best interests of our club.
Your memory might be a bit distorted regarding Goodsey.
Event 1) little girl racially vilifies Adam
Event 2) Fat Man feins a contrite apology shaking hands
Event 3) Fat Man then, on a retarded radio rant, thinks it's hilarious to compare Adam to King Kong
Adam should burn any bridge with McGuire and not look back.
You are kidding yourself if you think that Sydney can make friends with the Fat Controller. He'll be nice when we're under performing but won't do anything that's in our best interests & if we start to improve, he'll run us down again.
I simply, for the life of me, cannot understand your God-worship of these [censored] medial moguls & self-declared power brokers.Comment
-
You people are being short sighted. Eddie is winning against the Swans. He has won the Cola, banned recruitment and the academy's are next.
The AFL community, the AFL commission and the media are backing Eddie. The Hawks are good mates with Eddie and no one is raising an eyelid on Frawley or O'Rourke.
It's to bring Eddie into the tent and nullify him. Forgiveness and friendship from Adam will be warmly received from Eddie and he will lay off the Swans to keep building a bridge with Adam.
This is a pragmatic decision in the best interests of the football club.
You people feel better when you bash Eddie, but you are only hurting your Football Club. It's time to get pragmatic, it's time to have a cease fire on Eddie and it's time to make Eddie a friend of our club like the Hawks have done.
This is in the best interests of our club.
It's not working in my opinion.
Why don't we change strategy and embrace him. We are already losing the war. What is there to lose from embracing Eddie.Comment
-
You people are being short sighted. Eddie is winning against the Swans. He has won the Cola, banned recruitment and the academy's are next.
The AFL community, the AFL commission and the media are backing Eddie. The Hawks are good mates with Eddie and no one is raising an eyelid on Frawley or O'Rourke.
It's to bring Eddie into the tent and nullify him. Forgiveness and friendship from Adam will be warmly received from Eddie and he will lay off the Swans to keep building a bridge with Adam.
This is a pragmatic decision in the best interests of the football club.
You people feel better when you bash Eddie, but you are only hurting your Football Club. It's time to get pragmatic, it's time to have a cease fire on Eddie and it's time to make Eddie a friend of our club like the Hawks have done.
This is in the best interests of our club.Oh, you are serious? In that case ... what a load of drivel! Nope, that doesn't cover it ... what utter crap!
Your memory might be a bit distorted regarding Goodsey.
Event 1) little girl racially vilifies Adam
Event 2) Fat Man feins a contrite apology shaking hands
Event 3) Fat Man then, on a retarded radio rant, thinks it's hilarious to compare Adam to King Kong
Adam should burn any bridge with McGuire and not look back.
You are kidding yourself if you think that Sydney can make friends with the Fat Controller. He'll be nice when we're under performing but won't do anything that's in our best interests & if we start to improve, he'll run us down again.
I simply, for the life of me, cannot understand your God-worship of these [censored] medial moguls & self-declared power brokers.
We need to nullify him.Comment
-
parking3.jpg
?I come to bury Eddie, not to praise him.
The evil that men do lives after them;
The good is oft interred with their bones?
? Ludwig ShakespeareComment
-
Well we could point out to Eddie that the Trade Ban on the Swans is also hurting the Pies. A realistic trade scenario could have been that we swapped Lumumba and Malceski. That would have been a big win for Collingwood and the Swans would also have been better off with Lumumba rather than Pick 39. I would rate AA Malceski as a better fit for Collingwood than Varcoe who they ended up with. I get some small consolation in thinking that the trade ban may have actually disadvantaged Collingwood.Comment
-
Doubts
social media has repeatedly speculated regarding his sincerity in undertaking counselling & more whether it made any difference
Either that or he is a hypocrite.
Plus one can be a racist but still nice to some people of alternate race.
But that's just my opinionComment
-
'An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." Sums it up in my book why we shouldn't go grovelling and *** licking to eddie."You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
-
You people are being short sighted. Eddie is winning against the Swans. He has won the Cola, banned recruitment and the academy's are next.
The AFL community, the AFL commission and the media are backing Eddie. The Hawks are good mates with Eddie and no one is raising an eyelid on Frawley or O'Rourke.
It's to bring Eddie into the tent and nullify him. Forgiveness and friendship from Adam will be warmly received from Eddie and he will lay off the Swans to keep building a bridge with Adam.
This is a pragmatic decision in the best interests of the football club.
You people feel better when you bash Eddie, but you are only hurting your Football Club. It's time to get pragmatic, it's time to have a cease fire on Eddie and it's time to make Eddie a friend of our club like the Hawks have done.
This is in the best interests of our club.
Eddie will not complain about the Hawks or the Dons as they are his allies and good mates.
He won't complain about the Swans if we become his mate as well.Comment
-
Well we could point out to Eddie that the Trade Ban on the Swans is also hurting the Pies. A realistic trade scenario could have been that we swapped Lumumba and Malceski. That would have been a big win for Collingwood and the Swans would also have been better off with Lumumba rather than Pick 39. I would rate AA Malceski as a better fit for Collingwood than Varcoe who they ended up with. I get some small consolation in thinking that the trade ban may have actually disadvantaged Collingwood.The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.Comment
-
Comment
-
You people are being short sighted. Eddie is winning against the Swans. He has won the Cola, banned recruitment and the academy's are next.
The AFL community, the AFL commission and the media are backing Eddie. The Hawks are good mates with Eddie and no one is raising an eyelid on Frawley or O'Rourke.
It's to bring Eddie into the tent and nullify him. Forgiveness and friendship from Adam will be warmly received from Eddie and he will lay off the Swans to keep building a bridge with Adam.
This is a pragmatic decision in the best interests of the football club.
You people feel better when you bash Eddie, but you are only hurting your Football Club. It's time to get pragmatic, it's time to have a cease fire on Eddie and it's time to make Eddie a friend of our club like the Hawks have done.
This is in the best interests of our club.
Inviting Fat Eddie into our tent is like inviting Lord Volemort into Hogwarts. It's plain crazy!Comment
Comment