1st Qualifying Final Freo v Sydney Pre Match Discussion

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Matt79
    Bring it on!
    • Sep 2004
    • 3143

    1st Qualifying Final Freo v Sydney Pre Match Discussion

    Match confirmed Saturday afternoon 1.20pm local time (3.20pm Syd / Mel).

    Massive task but at least we have given ourselves a chance.

    Initial Changes OUT: K Jack (Inj) B.Jack (Omitted) Z Jones
    IN: Mcglynn, McVeigh, Smith
    Swannies for life!
  • Mug Punter
    On the Rookie List
    • Nov 2009
    • 3325

    #2
    Originally posted by Matt79
    Match confirmed Saturday afternoon 1.20pm local time (3.20pm Syd / Mel).

    Massive task but at least we have given ourselves a chance.

    Initial Changes OUT: K Jack (Inj) B.Jack (Omitted) Z Jones
    IN: Mcglynn, McVeigh, Smith
    Tough call to omit BJ but afraid I agree. BJ will be much better for this season and I think that with another top off season he can become a very good AFL footballer. Zak Jones will slide into Shaw's spot pretty seamlessly next season, he just needs to be patient.

    If Gary Rohan is out then I'd keep Zak Jones in.

    And I never though I'd say this but Dean Towers must play nest week, he was just great out there tonight

    Comment

    • ugg
      Can you feel it?
      Site Admin
      • Jan 2003
      • 15970

      #3
      I think Lloyd will make way before BJ, if you take their form over the past month or so into consideration
      Reserves live updates (Twitter)
      Reserves WIKI -
      Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

      Comment

      • Matt79
        Bring it on!
        • Sep 2004
        • 3143

        #4
        Originally posted by ugg
        I think Lloyd will make way before BJ, if you take their form over the past month or so into consideration
        Yeah, fair call. Geez we need Rohan's speed and defensive pressure over there...hope the knee is not too bad.
        Swannies for life!

        Comment

        • DamY
          Senior Player
          • Sep 2011
          • 1479

          #5
          Horse's post match pressed suggested Gaz was fine, expect him to line up next week

          Comment

          • ernie koala
            Senior Player
            • May 2007
            • 3251

            #6
            Given most of Freo's team had the week off, I'm surprised they elected for a Sat game over a Friday game.

            I would of thought they would ask themselves...

            Q: What will advantage us the most? A: Give the Swans a 6 day turnaround.

            A mistake by Freo...IMO.

            OUT : Jack, Lloyd, B Jack

            IN : McVeigh, Smith, McGlynn

            Given Horse's praise for Towers, he'll probably play. Problem is when ever he has played in a game with pressure, he goes missing.

            I'd much prefer Bird in the side, as sub.
            Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

            Comment

            • longmile
              Crumber
              • Apr 2011
              • 3367

              #7
              Personally I'd have

              OUTS: K. Jack, Towers, Jones

              INS: McGlynn, McVeigh, Smith

              Would be good to fit Bird in there as well with the midfield weakened. Will be interesting week at the selection table

              Comment

              • aardvark
                Veterans List
                • Mar 2010
                • 5685

                #8
                Originally posted by longmile
                Personally I'd have

                OUTS: K. Jack, Towers, Jones

                INS: McGlynn, McVeigh, Smith

                Would be good to fit Bird in there as well with the midfield weakened. Will be interesting week at the selection table
                Agree. BJ ahead of Towers for me. Lloyd is a worry too.

                Comment

                • longmile
                  Crumber
                  • Apr 2011
                  • 3367

                  #9
                  Originally posted by aardvark
                  Agree. BJ ahead of Towers for me. Lloyd is a worry too.
                  I agree. Either Lloyd to sub or Bird in for Lloyd, but I feel like that may make us a bit inside heavy and 4 changes seems like alot to make, especially with McGlynn and Bird having very little senior time this year.

                  Comment

                  • aardvark
                    Veterans List
                    • Mar 2010
                    • 5685

                    #10
                    7 Game day reckon Jack 2-3 weeks with a medial strain. Probably a good result if correct.

                    Comment

                    • Nico
                      Veterans List
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 11339

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Matt79
                      Yeah, fair call. Geez we need Rohan's speed and defensive pressure over there...hope the knee is not too bad.
                      But does Rohan get enough of the footy? 10 kicks, 2 handpasses, 5 marks, 1 tackle. does a lot of chasing but does it translate into tackles?
                      http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                      Comment

                      • barry
                        Veterans List
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 8499

                        #12
                        The only "definates" are:

                        OUTS: K. Jack

                        INS: McVeigh, Smith

                        If Smith is not right, then it will be simple. McVeigh for Jack.

                        If Smith does come in, I'd say Lloyd would probably miss.

                        As for McGlynn, I dont think we will risk underdone players, when we already have Buddy and Rohan struggling in the forward line.
                        McGlynn is fighting with Towers and BJ for that forward spot.

                        Comment

                        • dimelb
                          pr. dim-melb; m not f
                          • Jun 2003
                          • 6889

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Nico
                          But does Rohan get enough of the footy? 10 kicks, 2 handpasses, 5 marks, 1 tackle. does a lot of chasing but does it translate into tackles?
                          I think yesterday he was playing mostly in defence. I prefer to see him up forward: leaves any defender for dead, consistently very good mark and reliable kick. Then you add in his capacity to apply forward pressure and either frighten the life out of defenders or run them down.
                          He reminds him of the guys, close-set, slow, and never rattled, who were play-makers on the team. (John Updike, seeing Josh Kennedy in a crystal ball)

                          Comment

                          • Mel_C
                            Veterans List
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 4470

                            #14
                            Out:
                            1. Slow starts against Freo
                            2. Dodgy WA/Freo biased umpires (i.e. Dagleish number 7 from earlier in the year).

                            Comment

                            • Ludwig
                              Veterans List
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 9359

                              #15
                              I think some of the criticism of Lloyd has been unwarranted. I watched the replay of the 1st half and thought he played very well, particularly in the 1st qtr when he set up 2 good scoring shots. His kicking was spot on and his decision making was excellent.

                              His role is to set up on the wing and play that outside runner both offensively and defensively. He runs hard all day. He took 10 marks for the game. He is often there to slow down play on defensive transition, quickly moving back to help out in the defensive 50. He often presents as a secondary outlet option, most of the time not getting the ball delivered to him, but he keeps on providing that option. He doesn't fade out of the game.

                              We know he doesn't have the strength (yet) to contest the hard ball against the stronger bodies of mature AFL players. He was a good inside player in the NEAFL when it was a lot easier and is likely to improve over time with his physical development. I think he makes good choices as to when he should go hard at the ground ball and when it's best to lay off (because he's more likely to be effective if the ball comes loose to the outside when his chances of getting possession are improved).

                              He's not a big impact player, but is quite effective. I have said before that he needs to continue to improve if he wants to hold a spot in a very talented midfield, but so far he seems on track to give it a fair go. I expect that he'll have to fight hard to sneak into the 22 over the next several years. I think his prototype is someone like Steele Sidebottom.

                              On the big ground in Perth, his running ability could be valuable. I still think he's ahead of BJ at the moment. It's a tossup as to whether he would be preferable too Jones. It depends on what we need on the day.

                              Comment

                              Working...