2015 Grand Final

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Faunac8
    Senior Player
    • Mar 2014
    • 1548

    Move the Grand Final from the MCG ? Yep great idea lets not stop there what about the Boxing Day test? Hobart and Brisbane I think deserve a turn.
    The Australian tennis Open should be held in the home town of the defending champion or keeping in line with some of the arguments put forward on here the home of the top seeds.
    Yes in the 60's there was a plan put forward to have Waverley Park host the Grand Final once it was completed to hold 150,000 or so spectators.
    That really would have been a sight to behold. But that was 50 odd years ago and the plan was knocked on the head by the State Government to protect its interest in the MCG.
    As an aside I went to the last game held there when Hawthorn ( of course it would be them ) beat us in front of around 75,000 or so.
    Like it or not the MCG is the spiritual and rightful home of AFL and a worthy venue for that one day in September ( or October as the case may be )

    Comment

    • bloodsbigot
      Regular in the Side
      • Mar 2010
      • 813

      Originally posted by Faunac8
      Move the Grand Final from the MCG ? Yep great idea lets not stop there what about the Boxing Day test? Hobart and Brisbane I think deserve a turn.
      The Australian tennis Open should be held in the home town of the defending champion or keeping in line with some of the arguments put forward on here the home of the top seeds.
      Yes in the 60's there was a plan put forward to have Waverley Park host the Grand Final once it was completed to hold 150,000 or so spectators.
      That really would have been a sight to behold. But that was 50 odd years ago and the plan was knocked on the head by the State Government to protect its interest in the MCG.
      As an aside I went to the last game held there when Hawthorn ( of course it would be them ) beat us in front of around 75,000 or so.
      Like it or not the MCG is the spiritual and rightful home of AFL and a worthy venue for that one day in September ( or October as the case may be )
      If you know your history the Boxing Day test has only been a recent thing (1970s) so it's not like it goes back hundreds of years. So changing it is not as absurd as you're attempting to make it sound.

      I completely disagree that the MCG is the spiritual home of Australian football. 'That one day in September' can be played at another venue and most people wouldn't notice the difference nor care. They'd get over it pretty fast. In fact, your admission that it's not 'the one day in September' anymore just goes to show how most people can be rather flexible when it comes to tradition.

      In the 1990s, there was outrage when Preliminary Finals were moved outside of Victoria for the first time. Nowadays, we look back with embarrassment. The same will apply when we look back and realize Hawthorn, undeserving, played the Grand Final at their home ground twice.

      People really need to take their Victorian/tradition goggles off and see the big picture. It's no longer a suburban footy league. It's the Australian Football League. It's not about tradition anymore, it's about moving the game forward and having a fair competition.

      Adelaide, Sydney and soon Perth have top quality stadiums to play the final game at. It's high time the game got some integrity and stopped unfairly favouring Victorian teams.

      Comment

      • barry
        Veterans List
        • Jan 2003
        • 8499

        Those in favor of mcg only are only pandering to the eddie macguire of the world.
        You must feel dirty.

        Comment

        • Faunac8
          Senior Player
          • Mar 2014
          • 1548

          Originally posted by bloodsbigot
          If you know your history the Boxing Day test has only been a recent thing (1970s) so it's not like it goes back hundreds of years. So changing it is not as absurd as you're attempting to make it sound.

          I completely disagree that the MCG is the spiritual home of Australian football. 'That one day in September' can be played at another venue and most people wouldn't notice the difference nor care. They'd get over it pretty fast. In fact, your admission that it's not 'the one day in September' anymore just goes to show how most people can be rather flexible when it comes to tradition.

          In the 1990s, there was outrage when Preliminary Finals were moved outside of Victoria for the first time. Nowadays, we look back with embarrassment. The same will apply when we look back and realize Hawthorn, undeserving, played the Grand Final at their home ground twice.

          People really need to take their Victorian/tradition goggles off and see the big picture. It's no longer a suburban footy league. It's the Australian Football League. It's not about tradition anymore, it's about moving the game forward and having a fair competition. .

          Adelaide, Sydney and soon Perth have top quality stadiums to play the final game at. It's high time the game got some integrity and stopped unfairly favouring Victorian teams.
          Yes I know that the Boxing Day test is relatively recent the point was would it now be held else where?
          Your being slightly tongue in cheek surely If you think that most people wouldnt notice or care about it being held elsewhere. I would also be interested in hearing your nomination for the spiritual home of football if it isn't the MCG ?
          Living in Queensland I can assure you that I don't have a Victorian pair of goggles but is tradition and keeping it really such a bad thing thing?

          BTW I am not sure why you would look back with embarrassment regarding the preliminary finals? looking back in time and trying to put a current perspective on anything is fraught with potential emotional trauma.

          - - - Updated - - -

          Originally posted by barry
          Those in favor of mcg only are only pandering to the eddie macguire of the world.
          You must feel dirty.
          Long bow alert !!!!!

          Comment

          • Faunac8
            Senior Player
            • Mar 2014
            • 1548

            Originally posted by barry
            Those in favor of mcg only are only pandering to the eddie macguire of the world.
            You must feel dirty.
            If we can only get 30000 or so at a final at ANZ would a grand final (which I assume you are in favour of Barry so you can use your precious membership to attend ) between say two Victorian sides attract a full house?

            Comment

            • barry
              Veterans List
              • Jan 2003
              • 8499

              In the past the tradition of the MCG Grand final never effected anyone. With 8 non vic teams it now has a very large impact on integrity.

              You now choose between the two. Tradition or integrity.

              Comment

              • Faunac8
                Senior Player
                • Mar 2014
                • 1548

                Originally posted by barry
                Those in favor of mcg only are only pandering to the eddie macguire of the world.
                You must feel dirty.
                Also Mcwhiner will be thrilled to be referred to as " the Eddie Macguire " rather a grandiose description for a xenophobic agitator and bogan.

                Comment

                • Faunac8
                  Senior Player
                  • Mar 2014
                  • 1548

                  Using the venue as an excuse doesn't do any justice to a team if your good enough you will win anywhere. Home ground is not such an advantage in Grand Finals as people make out.
                  Integrity is not really the word you should be using here as it is defined as either
                  1)the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles or
                  2) the state of being whole and undivided.
                  Neither of which really have anything to do with where a game of football is played
                  Ironically enough probably the best phrase to describe what you are looking for Barry would be " level playing field "

                  Comment

                  • rb4x
                    Regular in the Side
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 968

                    Using the venue as an excuse doesn't do any justice to a team if your good enough you will win anywhere.

                    By good enough you mean so overwhelmingly superior that you can overcome the handicap that you have been given.

                    Look at the size of the handicap.

                    Hawks home ground advantage 3 goals.
                    Hawks crowd advantage 2 goals
                    Hawks not needing to travel 2 goals
                    Eagles loss of crowd support 2 goals
                    Eagles loss of crowd support 2 goals
                    Eagles need to travel 2 goals

                    Total disadvantage 13 goals or 78 points

                    Qualifying Final Eagles win by 32 points
                    Grand Final Hawks win by 46 points

                    Turnaround 78 points

                    If you take handicap away from Grand Final result Eagles would have won by 32 points

                    If played at a neutral venue like the Olympic stadium then Hawks would have probably won by a small margin as they would have had still advantages with less travel distance and possibly greater crowd support as supporters would have had less distance to travel.

                    Playing Grand Finals at the MCG is one of the greatest inequities in the AFL. It smacks of FIFA type corruption that the MCG has been given such an extremely long contract at mates rates to hold the Grand Final with TV revenues expected to grow astronomically in the future.

                    When are we going to hear McGuire and co complain about this inequity? Answer Never.

                    Comment

                    • barry
                      Veterans List
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 8499

                      Take this into history, and you can see that the Brisbane 3-peat was a phenomenal performance, and probably the greatest of all time.
                      While the hawks 3-peat would be seen as the weakest, as it was all with a significant home ground advantage, not deserved in 2/3 cases.

                      Comment

                      • Faunac8
                        Senior Player
                        • Mar 2014
                        • 1548

                        Originally posted by rb4x
                        Using the venue as an excuse doesn't do any justice to a team if your good enough you will win anywhere.

                        By good enough you mean so overwhelmingly superior that you can overcome the handicap that you have been given.

                        Look at the size of the handicap.

                        Hawks home ground advantage 3 goals.
                        Hawks crowd advantage 2 goals
                        Hawks not needing to travel 2 goals
                        Eagles loss of crowd support 2 goals
                        Eagles loss of crowd support 2 goals
                        Eagles need to travel 2 goals

                        Total disadvantage 13 goals or 78 points

                        Qualifying Final Eagles win by 32 points
                        Grand Final Hawks win by 46 points

                        Turnaround 78 points

                        If you take handicap away from Grand Final result Eagles would have won by 32 points

                        If played at a neutral venue like the Olympic stadium then Hawks would have probably won by a small margin as they would have had still advantages with less travel distance and possibly greater crowd support as supporters would have had less distance to travel.

                        Playing Grand Finals at the MCG is one of the greatest inequities in the AFL. It smacks of FIFA type corruption that the MCG has been given such an extremely long contract at mates rates to hold the Grand Final with TV revenues expected to grow astronomically in the future.

                        When are we going to hear McGuire and co complain about this inequity? Answer Never.
                        Is it possible you could quantify these alleged advantages Barry ? Possibly some facts or statistics ?

                        Comment

                        • barry
                          Veterans List
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 8499

                          It wasnt me that put those up, but I agree with the sentiment.

                          Simply way to look at it is West Coasts win/loss record for home games vs away games this year. I doubt anyone is disputing home ground advantage are they ?

                          The theory that home ground advantage exists through all H&A rounds, all finals, then disappears on grand final day seems a little odd to say the least.

                          Comment

                          • Faunac8
                            Senior Player
                            • Mar 2014
                            • 1548

                            Originally posted by barry
                            It wasnt me that put those up, but I agree with the sentiment.

                            Simply way to look at it is West Coasts win/loss record for home games vs away games this year. I doubt anyone is disputing home ground advantage are they ?

                            The theory that home ground advantage exists through all H&A rounds, all finals, then disappears on grand final day seems a little odd to say the least.
                            My apologies Barry that's what happens when I post while working ????
                            Is fair to say we agree to disagree ????????

                            Comment

                            Working...