2015 Grand Final

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stevoswan
    Veterans List
    • Sep 2014
    • 8548

    #76
    Originally posted by Levii3
    Nice back and forth, i don't think we'll ever agree. I don't want the GF to be moved completely away from the MCG but with afl played in 5 states (Tasmania will never get a Team) but in a 8 years period at least have four played interstate and four at the MCG, every second year is a different state. The game has to grow nationally Victoria alone can't sustain it forever.
    I agree with your sentiments Levii3, but while the power base remains in Melbourne, ie; forever, the status quo will remain. Part of that power base is half the clubs in the league who vote on commission/football proposals! It sucks, but it's a reality. Interstate clubs will always be the poor cousins.....
    Last edited by stevoswan; 4 October 2015, 06:45 PM.

    Comment

    • Melbourne_Blood
      Senior Player
      • May 2010
      • 3312

      #77
      Originally posted by stevoswan
      I agree with your sentiments Levii3, but while the power base remains in Melbourne, ie; forever, the status quo will remain. Part if that power base is half the clubs in the league who vote on commission/football proposals! It sucks, but it's a reality. Interstate clubs will always be the poor cousins.....
      For me, moving the GF away from the 'G' is akin to changing the date of Christmas. Something's should be left untouched. I'm all for the growing of the game, however I don't believe moving the GF venue around is a necessary component in establishing a strong and truly national competition.

      Comment

      • stevoswan
        Veterans List
        • Sep 2014
        • 8548

        #78
        Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
        For me, moving the GF away from the 'G' is akin to changing the date of Christmas. Something's should be left untouched. I'm all for the growing of the game, however I don't believe moving the GF venue around is a necessary component in establishing a strong and truly national competition.
        I can see both sides of the story definitely, and as a Victorian, I have always seen the 'G as the rightful place to hold the GF and the spiritual home and all that, but the last few years of AFL behaviour has me more conflicted in this view. I guess if nothing changes, it will always mean interstate glory, esp. Swans glory, on the big day will always be sweeter at the 'G, because we take the cup 'away' from this 'spiritual home' and stick it up the 'heartland', albeit possibly less frequently....

        Comment

        • rojo
          Opti-pessi-misti
          • Mar 2009
          • 1103

          #79
          I am not Victorian but I believe, like Adam Simpson, that the MCG is the home of AFL and the GF should always be played there. I don't buy into the desire of some for constant change regarding our game, usually to copy the practices of some other code or sport, or TV sponsors. I agree that even for the Swans, GF victory at the 'G' would be so much sweeter than at the SCG or the Gabba ...... Am I a traditionalist with a sense of history? Possibly!

          Comment

          • bloodsbigot
            Regular in the Side
            • Mar 2010
            • 813

            #80
            Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
            Which is about 40,000 short of where it needs to be if it is to ever the host the big dance...
            The soccer World Cup Final is the biggest sporting event in the world, with the most viewers, and in 2014 it was held at a stadium seating only 74,000. In 2006 69,000. etc etc. Getting to 100,000 is no big deal.

            The Grand Final should be played at a neutral venue or at the very least shared around.

            I don't buy into this 'tradition' stuff anymore. They've played the Grand Finals at other venues apart from the MCG before. They played it at Princes Park in 1945 when the swans played Carlton ffs.

            It's not the VFL anymore and it's high time the so-called 'AFL' started acting like they're fair dinkum about a national competition. The longer the Grand Final is kept at the MCG the more it will remain Victoria-centric and remain in a bubble.

            The Grand Final venue should be rotated between cities as the Superbowl is in America. It should be decided a few years before. Cities should be able to bid for it.

            - - - Updated - - -

            Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
            There's no way in hell they would go from a 100k capacity to a 60k. Not. A. Chance.
            Why? Other leagues greater than the AFL do it.

            - - - Updated - - -

            Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
            For me, moving the GF away from the 'G' is akin to changing the date of Christmas. Something's should be left untouched. I'm all for the growing of the game, however I don't believe moving the GF venue around is a necessary component in establishing a strong and truly national competition.
            If you want a Victorian league so bad, then there's always Port Melbourne in the VFL.

            It's time to move on... seriously. The AFL is NOT the VFL anymore.

            - - - Updated - - -

            Originally posted by stevoswan
            I can see both sides of the story definitely, and as a Victorian, I have always seen the 'G as the rightful place to hold the GF and the spiritual home and all that, but the last few years of AFL behaviour has me more conflicted in this view. I guess if nothing changes, it will always mean interstate glory, esp. Swans glory, on the big day will always be sweeter at the 'G, because we take the cup 'away' from this 'spiritual home' and stick it up the 'heartland', albeit possibly less frequently....
            It still irritates me that Victorian supporters still call teams outside Victoria as 'interstaters.' Seriously... this attitude is what holds Australian Football back from growing outside Victoria.

            Comment

            • 0918330512
              Senior Player
              • Sep 2011
              • 1654

              #81
              Originally posted by bloodsbigot
              I don't buy into this 'tradition' stuff anymore. They've played the Grand Finals at other venues apart from the MCG before. They played it at Princes Park in 1945 when the swans played Carlton ffs.
              Well I'm sure you'll get your wish after the conclusion of World War 3, because it took the extenuating circumstances of the unavailability of the MCG after the end of WW2 for the grand final to be shifted to Princess Park in 1945.

              Comment

              • aardvark
                Veterans List
                • Mar 2010
                • 5685

                #82
                Someone should send Gill the Dill a copy of the NRL Grand Final. That's how it's done AFL.

                Comment

                • Melbourne_Blood
                  Senior Player
                  • May 2010
                  • 3312

                  #83
                  Originally posted by bloodsbigot
                  The soccer World Cup Final is the biggest sporting event in the world, with the most viewers, and in 2014 it was held at a stadium seating only 74,000. In 2006 69,000. etc etc. Getting to 100,000 is no big deal.

                  The Grand Final should be played at a neutral venue or at the very least shared around.

                  I don't buy into this 'tradition' stuff anymore. They've played the Grand Finals at other venues apart from the MCG before. They played it at Princes Park in 1945 when the swans played Carlton ffs.

                  It's not the VFL anymore and it's high time the so-called 'AFL' started acting like they're fair dinkum about a national competition. The longer the Grand Final is kept at the MCG the more it will remain Victoria-centric and remain in a bubble.

                  The Grand Final venue should be rotated between cities as the Superbowl is in America. It should be decided a few years before. Cities should be able to bid for it.

                  - - - Updated - - -



                  Why? Other leagues greater than the AFL do it.

                  - - - Updated - - -



                  If you want a Victorian league so bad, then there's always Port Melbourne in the VFL.

                  It's time to move on... seriously. The AFL is NOT the VFL anymore.

                  - - - Updated - - -



                  It still irritates me that Victorian supporters still call teams outside Victoria as 'interstaters.' Seriously... this attitude is what holds Australian Football back from growing outside Victoria.
                  I've never been alive when it was called the VFL pal. If I wanted a Victoria. League, my team wouldn't be in it, so that's a stupid comment. I don't believe moving the GF away from the 'G', one of our games grandest traditions, will have any impact whatsoever on the growing of the game nationally.

                  Comment

                  • Triple B
                    Formerly 'BBB'
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 6999

                    #84
                    Even though born and bred in Sydney, I'm comfortable with the GF at the MCG, it makes for a great pilgrimage of sorts every few years when we are good enough to make the big dance.

                    I think the biggest gripe about the GF always at the G is the two biggest mouths on equalisation are hellbent on dismantling any concessions afforded other clubs, particularly ours, such as COLA, academies etc. When it comes to the GF being played on their home ground every year, they become very silent and tradition becomes more important than equalisation.

                    If McGuire *spit* was president of the Bulldogs, do you think for one minute their elimination would not have been played at Etihad???
                    Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

                    Comment

                    • Conor_Dillon
                      On the Rookie List
                      • Jun 2013
                      • 1224

                      #85
                      Agree with Triple B that it shouldn't necessarily be changed, but it should definitely be mentioned in every 'equalisation' discussion.

                      Also the 100,000 people argument is pointless given the large percentage of those 'supporters' that are corporates and neutrals. Correct me if I'm wrong but weren't both clubs only given 15,000 tickets each for their members?

                      It will never happen due to the financial side of things, but how good would a grand-final be with 50,000 supporters from each team?

                      Also, it's time to make it a night game...like every single other significant sporting event on the planet. The atmosphere would be infinitely better at night.
                      Twitter @cmdil
                      Instagram @conordillon

                      Comment

                      • Primmy
                        Proud Tragic Swan
                        • Apr 2008
                        • 5970

                        #86
                        I doubt the players would ever want to play away from The Grand Final Stadium, and as has been pointed out, 100,000 capacity.....

                        It should be moved to twilight imho. Too many issues with sun in the eyes etc. And why on earth were the media going off because whatisname picked Hodge up after the 3/4 siren? Its not a blood sport. Its a sport's game. A big one, yes. But still.....

                        And finally, whats with all the overseas people performing? I don't get it. What's wrong with Australian performers! Appropriate ones! Some who can rock the place down. Brian Adams was good, and the crowd got into it. But.....?? que?????

                        And of course, the ticketing......sheesh......
                        If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhood

                        Comment

                        • barry
                          Veterans List
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 8499

                          #87
                          The NRL grand final killed the AFL one even before the Thurston show. And that was at, supposedly , the worst stadium in the world. This shows the grand finals are not deminished by their location.

                          It made the MCG look tired and old.

                          Until the grand final is movable, the AFL is still the VFL.

                          Comment

                          • annew
                            Senior Player
                            • Mar 2006
                            • 2164

                            #88
                            Originally posted by Triple B
                            Even though born and bred in Sydney, I'm comfortable with the GF at the MCG, it makes for a great pilgrimage of sorts every few years when we are good enough to make the big dance.

                            I think the biggest gripe about the GF always at the G is the two biggest mouths on equalisation are hellbent on dismantling any concessions afforded other clubs, particularly ours, such as COLA, academies etc. When it comes to the GF being played on their home ground every year, they become very silent and tradition becomes more important than equalisation.

                            If McGuire *spit* was president of the Bulldogs, do you think for one minute their elimination would not have been played at Etihad???
                            You are so right

                            Comment

                            • Bloods05
                              Senior Player
                              • Oct 2008
                              • 1641

                              #89
                              Originally posted by Conor_Dillon
                              It will never happen due to the financial side of things, but how good would a grand-final be with 50,000 supporters from each team?
                              It's not so much a question of how good it would be, rather a memory of how good it used to be. The GF is still fantastic but the atmosphere is nothing like the old days when it was all competing clubs' supporters. The level of emotional engagement in a close finish was insane.

                              Comment

                              • Bloods05
                                Senior Player
                                • Oct 2008
                                • 1641

                                #90
                                Originally posted by barry
                                The NRL grand final killed the AFL one even before the Thurston show. And that was at, supposedly , the worst stadium in the world. This shows the grand finals are not deminished by their location.

                                It made the MCG look tired and old.

                                Until the grand final is movable, the AFL is still the VFL.
                                And the NRL is still the NSWRL as long as their GF is in Sydney? Even though both clubs were from Qld?

                                Comment

                                Working...