2017 trading, drafting, list management

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Nico
    Veterans List
    • Jan 2003
    • 11329

    Originally posted by S.S. Bleeder
    If we get Blakey next year, won't he fit that role? Even after losing an elite mid I couldn't see us being able to afford Lynch.
    Might be a bit to expect from Blakey as an 18 year old. Couple of years later, yes. One of the problems with ongoing list management.
    http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

    Comment

    • Scottee
      Senior Player
      • Aug 2003
      • 1585

      Originally posted by 707
      I've never seen anything in Foote's game to indicate he's of or going to be AFL standard. Good NEAFL player but highly unlikely to cut it at the top level. How he stayed higher in the pecking order than Dawson is beyond me.

      Dawson's string of BOGs should have been rewarded, just lucky we re-signed him before that or no doubt he would be getting traded to SA.

      Surely AA & Dawson must be given opportunity as they have far more upside than some of our fringe players.
      Having recently critically watched the ressies GF replay on Youtube (along with about 30,000 others), I am having second thoughts about Foote not making it. He was clearly in our best few in the hardest match of the year against senior talent > Thats usually a good sign.
      We have them where we want them, everything is going according to plan!

      Comment

      • 707
        Veterans List
        • Aug 2009
        • 6204

        Originally posted by Nico
        Might be a bit to expect from Blakey as an 18 year old. Couple of years later, yes. One of the problems with ongoing list management.
        Nick needs to choose us over Norf and Brisbane before we worry about that.

        Geelong have bowed out of the Watts race, don't believe they can get the deal done with Melbourne. Port to the fore.

        Comment

        • AnnieH
          RWOs Black Sheep
          • Aug 2006
          • 11332

          Is this the most boring trade period ever.
          All talk - no action!!
          Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
          Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

          Comment

          • stevoswan
            Veterans List
            • Sep 2014
            • 8544

            Originally posted by Cainit
            Our improvement will be as follows

            Tippet hopefully fit all year and becomes a weapon when resting in the forward line

            Sinclair to develop into a 40 goal forward

            Dawson to become a regular in the best 22

            Haywood, Melican and Florent to go to the next level

            Reid to be a regular in defence

            Cameron to develop into a forward also get 30-40 goals

            Buddy moves to the wing

            And lastly Towers never plays again for the Swans
            Get over yourself Cainit........

            Comment

            • Mel_C
              Veterans List
              • Jan 2003
              • 4470

              Originally posted by AnnieH
              Is this the most boring trade period ever.
              All talk - no action!!
              Anthony Hudson was so bored this afternoon on SEN and he gave me heart failure saying he had breaking news that Buddy had announced that he wanted to leave and come back to Melbourne! My heart jumped out of my chest before I realised he was joking!!

              Comment

              • stevoswan
                Veterans List
                • Sep 2014
                • 8544

                Originally posted by Mel_C
                Anthony Hudson was so bored this afternoon on SEN and he gave me heart failure saying he had breaking news that Buddy had announced that he wanted to leave and come back to Melbourne! My heart jumped out of my chest before I realised he was joking!!
                Gotta love Huddo!

                Comment

                • longmile
                  Crumber
                  • Apr 2011
                  • 3362

                  Just to clarify, is Blakely available in the upcoming draft or the following?

                  Comment

                  • liz
                    Veteran
                    Site Admin
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 16739

                    Originally posted by longmile
                    Just to clarify, is Blakely available in the upcoming draft or the following?
                    2018 draft

                    Comment

                    • Meg
                      Go Swannies!
                      Site Admin
                      • Aug 2011
                      • 4828

                      2017 trading, drafting, list management

                      Originally posted by 707
                      Nick (Blakey) needs to choose us over Norf and Brisbane before we worry about that.
                      I know we have had this discussion in the past on RWO and we should get a definitive answer next year when Blakey Jnr becomes eligible for the draft. Further, as his situation (eligible via Swans academy and two F/S clubs) will be unique I don?t rule out a rewrite of AFL rules next year to cover this scenario.

                      However, I remain of the view that under the current rules should the Swans nominate Blakey as an academy pick this would take priority over any F/S nomination. I base this on the fact that the F/S nomination explicitly refers to player consent (as shown by his signature on the nomination form) but there is no such explicit mention in regard to academy nominations.

                      There is a draft nomination form 39A which has to be completed for both academy and F/S nominations. I can?t access this from a tablet but if someone is interested enough to try from a desk top, it may become clearer (that is, does a player have to sign consent to an academy nomination). I think these forms can be found at: www.nabafldraftnom.com.au

                      Comment

                      • Ludwig
                        Veterans List
                        • Apr 2007
                        • 9359

                        I have a few tough questions for the rules' experts. I hope Meg and the rest of the RWO intelligentsia will have a go at this.
                        1. Can a contracted player be delisted without his consent?
                        2. If a contracted player is delisted and then drafted by another club, is that club obligated to pick up the entirety of the players remaining contract?
                        3. If a primary listed player is delisted and then added back to the list as a rookie at a salary higher than the AFL standard rookie salary, is half the contract salary excluded from TPP or just half the AFL standard rookie salary?
                        4. If a player was once drafted as a Cat B rookie and subsequently delisted, can he be drafted again as a Cat B rookie or only as a Cat A rookie?
                        5. Is there any limit to the number of 3rd year rookies that a club can have on its list?

                        Comment

                        • 707
                          Veterans List
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 6204

                          1. No, he has a contract that must be honoured.
                          2. Doesn't apply, see 1
                          3. Doesn't apply, see 1
                          4. Cat B has very specific parameters, if he was Cat B rookied as a not registered for 3 years then he will have been registered next time around unless there is a 3 year gap. Other Cat B are non football/overseas/other sports so presume once has been a Cat B they wouldn't apply. Maybe there's no rules for such circumstances?
                          5. Formerly was just one but think it's more liberal now.

                          Comment

                          • ugg
                            Can you feel it?
                            Site Admin
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 15963

                            I?m pretty sure you can delist a contracted player. However the club is obligated to pay that player the money stated in the contract as well as include the money in the salary cap.

                            In fact this is the exact rumour going around at the moment. That Port are going to delist the contracted Matthew Lobbe if they can?t find any takers at the trade table.
                            Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                            Reserves WIKI -
                            Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                            Comment

                            • Meg
                              Go Swannies!
                              Site Admin
                              • Aug 2011
                              • 4828

                              2017 trading, drafting, list management

                              Originally posted by Ludwig
                              I have a few tough questions for the rules' experts. I hope Meg and the rest of the RWO intelligentsia will have a go at this.
                              1. Can a contracted player be delisted without his consent?
                              2. If a contracted player is delisted and then drafted by another club, is that club obligated to pick up the entirety of the players remaining contract?
                              I?m not sure that 707?s reply is correct. See Clauses 17 & 18 pp. 83-85 of the current CBA (link below).

                              I read that to mean:

                              Yes, a contracted player can be delisted without his consent (but with the approval of the AFL). He must then be paid out according to the remaining term of the contract under the conditions set out here in the CBA. (And this is consistent with employment contracts with which I have had experience.)

                              Under the ?no unjust enrichment? clause 18, should the player then be drafted by another club, he (or the new club) may have to repay the former club some portion of the termination payment (see CBA for details). However there does not seem to be any obligation by the new club to pick up the whole of the remainder of the former contract. (For example, if there had been 3 years left, the new club might only contract the player for 2 years.)

                              Comment

                              • Meg
                                Go Swannies!
                                Site Admin
                                • Aug 2011
                                • 4828

                                Originally posted by Ludwig
                                I have a few tough questions for the rules' experts. I hope Meg and the rest of the RWO intelligentsia will have a go at this.
                                1. If a primary listed player is delisted and then added back to the list as a rookie at a salary higher than the AFL standard rookie salary, is half the contract salary excluded from TPP or just half the AFL standard rookie salary?
                                See p.19 of CBA (link previously attached) in regard to player lists 2018-2022.

                                ?Any amount paid to a Rookie Player in excess of the base payment payable to a 1st year, 41+ choice selection shall be included in the relevant AFL Club?s Total Player Payments.?

                                Comment

                                Working...