Match Day Rnd 14 Sydney V Essendon. SCG 19.50 pm.
Collapse
X
-
-
Never in doubt!!!All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
He's slagged us off big time. Absolute moron - like our club of champions would see it as vitally important to talk to him!! Overrated, overpaid hack!Comment
-
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
"A suppository is a solid dosage form that is inserted into the rectum (rectal suppository), vagina (vaginal suppository) or urethra (urethral suppository), where it dissolves or melts and exerts local or systemic effects. Suppositories are used to deliver both systemically and locally acting medications."Comment
-
OMG OMG OMG!
Two weeks in a row of absolute glory. This feels like Sep 2005 and it is only June of 2017.
I was freaking out about this game all week (just like when the finals are on). Every week will be like this for the rest of the year now. It will be interesting to see if the Swans can handle that much pressure and expectation over a sustained block of matches.
We really were out on our feet during the last quarter. Essendon ran out of steam too, but not until the last six minutes.
What a win - I just started screaming when Rohan took that mark, and although the sound is no longer audible it just keeps echoing inside my head.
OMG!
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkComment
-
Both instances should have been goals. The reviews indicated that they were both goals. The problem was that both goal umpires (I think it was actually the same goal umpire both times) said it was touched when in reality there was no way they could have been confident of that being correct.
The first decision was based on the position of the ball and whether the entire ball had passed the post. I think it did but it was at least debatable.
That second decision in particular showed no evidence of it touching the Essendon players fingers. In addition, the ball had passed the post. That was a clear goal and should have been overturned.Comment
-
-
Try 3, not 2.
Even dyed in the wool ABC Swans hater Gerard Whately said that 2 of those were wrong and we should have won running away, not coming from behind. And forget the ludicrous hand in the back free against Grundy.
I'll just focus on Grundy's magnificent contested mark and Papley's smother. Both absolutely sensational.My opinion is objective truth in its purest formComment

Comment