BT is intolerable

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Boddo
    Senior Player
    • Mar 2017
    • 1049

    Originally posted by barry
    I dont mind that. It was a mighty pack mark to "save" the game. Essendon should have saved it then. They had posession and about a minute to wind down. Instead they bombed it long, almost Richmond like.
    It wasn't a Leo Barry type mark. One was in a grand final in the last 20 seconds to save the game & win a premiership n the other was in a home n away game in the hope that one of the 2 sides could make the eight with a decent amount of time on the clock. It was a good game saving style mark similar to Reid's against Fremantle in the dieing seconds when we escaped with a draw. It was as stupid as Robertsons call of McGuane's running goal.

    Comment

    • Agent 86
      Senior Player
      • Aug 2004
      • 1686

      Originally posted by barry
      I dont mind that. It was a mighty pack mark to "save" the game. Essendon should have saved it then. They had posession and about a minute to wind down. Instead they bombed it long, almost Richmond like.
      It was a great grab. Think he was called to play on pretty quickly, so blazed away. Great work from Mills to mark and hand off to send it back.


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

      Comment

      • barry
        Veterans List
        • Jan 2003
        • 8499

        Originally posted by Boddo
        It wasn't a Leo Barry type mark. One was in a grand final in the last 20 seconds to save the game & win a premiership n the other was in a home n away game in the hope that one of the 2 sides could make the eight with a decent amount of time on the clock. It was a good game saving style mark similar to Reid's against Fremantle in the dieing seconds when we escaped with a draw. It was as stupid as Robertsons call of McGuane's running goal.
        I think you are being a bit precious. Calling a mark Leo Barry like is not only reserved for "grand final dying second pack marks to save games". Let it breathe.

        Comment

        • Boddo
          Senior Player
          • Mar 2017
          • 1049

          Originally posted by barry
          I think you are being a bit precious. Calling a mark Leo Barry like is not only reserved for "grand final dying second pack marks to save games". Let it breathe.
          It wasn't though. Nothing precious about calling a spade a spade

          Comment

          • Agent 86
            Senior Player
            • Aug 2004
            • 1686

            Originally posted by Boddo
            It wasn't though. Nothing precious about calling a spade a spade
            I'll never get tired of being reminded of that mark. Who cares? He's not as biased as some, & if it annoys you, turn down the sound.


            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

            Comment

            • Boddo
              Senior Player
              • Mar 2017
              • 1049

              Originally posted by Agent 86
              I'll never get tired of being reminded of that mark. Who cares? He's not as biased as some, & if it annoys you, turn down the sound.


              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
              Nothing to do with being biased more to do with commentators wrecking a good moment. Perfect example is Robertsons call of McGuanes great bouncing, running goal.

              Comment

              • bloodspirit
                Clubman
                • Apr 2015
                • 4448

                One of the Ch7 gang doing the solidarity bleat: No 'Roaming Brian' a loss for fans: Watson .

                It does catch in my throat a little when they feign concern for the fans or for the Swans' sponsors. Their only concern is ratings.
                All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

                Comment

                • 0918330512
                  Senior Player
                  • Sep 2011
                  • 1654

                  Originally posted by bloodspirit
                  One of the Ch7 gang doing the solidarity bleat: No 'Roaming Brian' a loss for fans: Watson .

                  It does catch in my throat a little when they feign concern for the fans or for the Swans' sponsors. Their only concern is ratings.
                  If they were truly concerned for ratings, BT wouldn't be calling games

                  Comment

                  • Boddo
                    Senior Player
                    • Mar 2017
                    • 1049

                    Originally posted by 09183305
                    If they were truly concerned for ratings, BT wouldn't be calling games
                    Well said

                    Comment

                    • Agent 86
                      Senior Player
                      • Aug 2004
                      • 1686

                      Originally posted by 09183305
                      If they were truly concerned for ratings, BT wouldn't be calling games



                      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                      Comment

                      • stevoswan
                        Veterans List
                        • Sep 2014
                        • 8550

                        Titus O'Rieilly nails it again: "After the game, there was controversy when the Swans didn?t allow Brian Taylor roam around their rooms. BT lost it on air as a result.

                        What struck me as strange, was that BT seemed surprised a group of people didn't want to spend time with him. I would have thought that was an iron-clad law of the universe.

                        The most surprising thing to me is it took until Round 14 for a team to put an end to the footballing equivalent of the drunk uncle annoying everyone at Christmas." Spot on yet again, Titus......

                        Comment

                        • YvonneH
                          Senior Player
                          • Sep 2011
                          • 1141

                          Another Friday night game this week, so will BT attempt another entry into our rooms or will he concentrate on the Demons' rooms (especially if they win)?

                          Comment

                          • Matty10
                            Senior Player
                            • Jun 2007
                            • 1331

                            Originally posted by bloodspirit
                            One of the Ch7 gang doing the solidarity bleat: No 'Roaming Brian' a loss for fans: Watson .

                            It does catch in my throat a little when they feign concern for the fans or for the Swans' sponsors. Their only concern is ratings.
                            AFL 360 went some way to setting the record straight on this. Gerard Whateley praised the media access offered by the Swans and subtly mocked BT and his antics.


                            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                            Comment

                            • grarmy
                              Warming the Bench
                              • Aug 2010
                              • 406

                              BT is not only irritating but also adds nothing to the 'game'. His is the inane jabber of 'fanzine' fill created to encourage viewers to stay on channel and be fed more advertising. Like many RWOers, I wait around hoping for team insight or an update on Tippo's injury recoveries. You get nothing.
                              "Play like you can’t lose."

                              Comment

                              • barry
                                Veterans List
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 8499

                                It seems the swans still treat the media on their terms only. Which is fine if you are in a one team town.....

                                Comment

                                Working...