BT is intolerable

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Blood Fever
    Veterans List
    • Apr 2007
    • 4048

    #76
    Originally posted by stevoswan
    Disappointed in Sam Lane tonight on the pre game show before the WC-Melb game with her 'heroes and villains' segment, where she had the Swans as the villains for not letting Ch 7 have access to the Swans players with the other commentators heartily agreeing .....don't let the facts get in the way of a bit of mudslinging and manufactured controversy eh? I thought she was better than that, but as we've seen before, working at Ch 7 has an influence. Even the formerly neutral Lingy is a biased tool now.

    You're right Stevo. They'll stick together even though it is totally dishonest. Commonplace in almost all media these days -TV, tabloid and Broadsheet. Looking for an edge on the opposition, never mind about truth and reality. Worrying.

    Huddo's commentary in the 2005 semi, while witnessing his team Geelong having a sure victory snatched away by Nick Davis was sheer class and is now legendary! Truly professional.
    Huddo far superior to Taylor

    Comment

    • Meg
      Go Swannies!
      Site Admin
      • Aug 2011
      • 4828

      #77
      Any regular attendee for night matches at the SCG knows that on a clear, cold night (as was the case last night) the SCG will be slippery as a result of dew. It sometimes happens for night cricket matches as well if the temperature drops. There was nothing unusual about last night's conditions - including the fact that the Swans' players kept slipping over. Funny advantage that!

      Comment

      • Meg
        Go Swannies!
        Site Admin
        • Aug 2011
        • 4828

        #78
        In the public tours at the SCG and Allianz Stadium they tell you that the curators (employees of the Sydney Cricket & Sports Ground Trust) sow a mix of grasses and cut to varying lengths to cater for the different sports to be played there - cricket and AFL in the main at the SCG and soccer and rugby & league at Allianz (cricket and soccer needing short grass, the other football codes longer grass).

        Comment

        • Agent 86
          Senior Player
          • Aug 2004
          • 1689

          #79
          Originally posted by S.S. Bleeder
          True but he's no worse than the other Vctorian commentators. Darcy and Ling are the most biased going around. Both of them utterly despise us and Brisbane.
          I agree. Ling is embarrassing.



          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

          Comment

          • Legs Akimbo
            Grand Poobah
            • Apr 2005
            • 2809

            #80
            Originally posted by Big Al
            Taylor replacing Cometti in the Friday Night Commentary Box was always a bit like replacing a Ferrari F40 with a Datsun 120y. Channel 7 need to get a tow truck ASAP...
            That's pretty unfair on 120y's. Drove like a boat but mine never let me down once. Sold it to a mate and never let him down either.

            Re the grass, they probably kept it long because they had the reserves playing on it before hand and didn't want it to get chopped up.

            Pretty sure, as per previous comment, that they stopped this happening years ago due to players being exposed (literally) on TV. AFL being AFL, they probably forgot about that.
            He had observed that people who did lie were, on the whole, more resourceful and ambitious and successful than people who did not lie.

            Comment

            • Sandridge
              Outer wing, Lake Oval
              • Apr 2010
              • 2076

              #81
              Originally posted by stevoswan
              Disappointed in Sam Lane tonight on the pre game show before the WC-Melb game with her 'heroes and villains' segment, where she had the Swans as the villains for not letting Ch 7 have access to the Swans players with the other commentators heartily agreeing .....don't let the facts get in the way of a bit of mudslinging and manufactured controversy eh? I thought she was better than that, but as we've seen before, working at Ch 7 has an influence.
              Agree. I suppose she has to be seen to be supporting a member of the Channel7 family but it was unnecessary support of an immature, self absorbed buffoon. Interestingly, when Taylor was doing his rant on Friday night, his fellow commentators just laughed at him. The fact that the Swans had told him he could talk to whoever he wanted but "over there" makes him look like a petulant toddler who cracked it because he didn't get his way.

              Comment

              • robamiee
                Regular in the Side
                • Sep 2005
                • 688

                #82
                be interesting on friday night again this week then...some of the players should have thinly veiled comments lined up for him....

                Comment

                • YvonneH
                  Senior Player
                  • Sep 2011
                  • 1141

                  #83
                  Originally posted by mcs
                  Really miss his commentary still, even after all these years. His call of the 2005 Nick Davis game is simply amazing. Taken from this world far too soon
                  MCS I seem to remember that it was Anthony Hudson who called this game and not Clinton. Hudson is a Geelong supporter, but his call was so professional, no barracking at all.

                  Comment

                  • Meg
                    Go Swannies!
                    Site Admin
                    • Aug 2011
                    • 4828

                    #84
                    Originally posted by robamiee
                    be interesting on friday night again this week then...some of the players should have thinly veiled comments lined up for him....
                    An added motivation to beat Melbourne? - as he only makes a pest of himself in the winning team's rooms.

                    Comment

                    • Sandridge
                      Outer wing, Lake Oval
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 2076

                      #85
                      Originally posted by Meg
                      An added motivation to beat Melbourne? - as he only makes a pest of himself in the winning team's rooms.
                      Can you imagine what he'll be like if the Dees knock us off and give him free access in their rooms? He'd be too immature to not have another go at us!

                      Comment

                      • robamiee
                        Regular in the Side
                        • Sep 2005
                        • 688

                        #86
                        maybe we should line up all the different colour powerade bottles behind him and different lengths of grass in front of him

                        Comment

                        • Velour&Ruffles
                          Regular in the Side
                          • Jun 2006
                          • 897

                          #87
                          Originally posted by Boddo
                          It's not just Sydney supporters. I think you'll find the majority of followers of the game dislike a lot of ch7 commentators. Read the comments section

                          No Cookies | Herald Sun
                          The article contains a yes/no poll for readers, asking if you were disappointed there was no Roamin Brian segment on Friday. Currently running at a resounding 62% not disappointed. Cop that Brian (and barry).

                          The article includes the mustachoied nuff nuff saying:?Buddy has been kind enough to give us a couple of minutes as you just saw, but that is it from the Sydney Swans ? no-one else, they can?t answer the questions like ?how do you think you went today? How did you pull up? Gee, how do you think the young guys went??

                          ?None of those questions for Sydney, far too hard, don?t want the eight or nine minutes exposure for their sponsors."


                          Frankly, if that's the calibre of questions then we learn absolutely nothing from the segment anyway. A pointless waste of time that is about, and really only about, placating one man's bloated, voracious and ever-demanding ego. Somehow I'm not buying that altruistic and magnanimous Brian is primarily concerned about the Swans' sponsors getting full value for their dollar. And if he actually cared about Swans fans he wouldn't say about 97% of the crap that he does.
                          My opinion is objective truth in its purest form

                          Comment

                          • dejavoodoo44
                            Veterans List
                            • Apr 2015
                            • 8626

                            #88
                            Originally posted by Velour&Ruffles
                            The article contains a yes/no poll for readers, asking if you were disappointed there was no Roamin Brian segment on Friday. Currently running at a resounding 62% not disappointed. Cop that Brian (and barry).

                            The article includes the mustachoied nuff nuff saying:?Buddy has been kind enough to give us a couple of minutes as you just saw, but that is it from the Sydney Swans ? no-one else, they can?t answer the questions like ?how do you think you went today? How did you pull up? Gee, how do you think the young guys went??

                            ?None of those questions for Sydney, far too hard, don?t want the eight or nine minutes exposure for their sponsors."


                            Frankly, if that's the calibre of questions then we learn absolutely nothing from the segment anyway. A pointless waste of time that is about, and really only about, placating one man's bloated, voracious and ever-demanding ego. Somehow I'm not buying that altruistic and magnanimous Brian is primarily concerned about the Swans' sponsors getting full value for their dollar. And if he actually cared about Swans fans he wouldn't say about 97% of the crap that he does.
                            Perhaps the club should adopt a public position along the lines of: well, we don't really mind Channel 7 doing their thing in the rooms after the game, but we'd just prefer it if the person asking the questions wasn't a dickhead, as we've had a long standing policy of "no dickheads". As a solution, is it possible that Daisy asks the questions?
                            Seems a perfectly reasonable compromise to me.

                            Comment

                            • Sandridge
                              Outer wing, Lake Oval
                              • Apr 2010
                              • 2076

                              #89
                              Originally posted by Velour&Ruffles
                              The article contains a yes/no poll for readers, asking if you were disappointed there was no Roamin Brian segment on Friday. Currently running at a resounding 62% not disappointed. Cop that Brian (and barry).

                              The article includes the mustachoied nuff nuff saying:?Buddy has been kind enough to give us a couple of minutes as you just saw, but that is it from the Sydney Swans ? no-one else, they can?t answer the questions like ?how do you think you went today? How did you pull up? Gee, how do you think the young guys went??

                              ?None of those questions for Sydney, far too hard, don?t want the eight or nine minutes exposure for their sponsors."


                              Frankly, if that's the calibre of questions then we learn absolutely nothing from the segment anyway. A pointless waste of time that is about, and really only about, placating one man's bloated, voracious and ever-demanding ego. Somehow I'm not buying that altruistic and magnanimous Brian is primarily concerned about the Swans' sponsors getting full value for their dollar. And if he actually cared about Swans fans he wouldn't say about 97% of the crap that he does.
                              So spot on!
                              Brian Taylor should watch the after match interview of Jake Lloyd on Swans TV.
                              Lloyd post match - Rd 14, 2017 - sydneyswans.com.au
                              First thing you notice is the questions are vastly superior to what Taylor would ask. And they're asked by someone who knows so much more about the Swans than Taylor does.
                              Secondly, during the Lloyd interview, you see Gary Rohan in the background being prepared for an interview with Fox Footy. Rohan is prepped with an ear piece and microphone by a Fox employee who treats Gary with respect and shares a joke with him. After being prepped, Rohan has to wait until they cross to him. He is still waiting patiently when the interview with Lloyd ceases.
                              Our players were available to talk to and would treat any media representative with respect. It would be nice to think that when approaching our club for contact, the media reps would show us the same courtesy.
                              Regarding our sponsors' value for money, they obviously got it on Friday night when Fox - not Channel 7 - spoke to the guy who kicked the winning goal. And with our record over the last 15 years, I'd imagine our sponsors are fairly happy with the exposure they've received.
                              Last edited by Sandridge; 25 June 2017, 12:13 PM.

                              Comment

                              • Boddo
                                Senior Player
                                • Mar 2017
                                • 1049

                                #90
                                In regards to sponsors it's not Sydney sponsors that miss out its ch7 sponsors every single week that miss out. I watch Foxtel but if the roaming interview was professionally done with good questions I'd switch over at the end of the game to watch it but with BT performing what is basically 1990's footy show comedy I have no interest in it. That type of comedy routine is dying just like the footy show

                                Comment

                                Working...