BT is intolerable
Collapse
X
-
-
Any regular attendee for night matches at the SCG knows that on a clear, cold night (as was the case last night) the SCG will be slippery as a result of dew. It sometimes happens for night cricket matches as well if the temperature drops. There was nothing unusual about last night's conditions - including the fact that the Swans' players kept slipping over. Funny advantage that!Comment
-
In the public tours at the SCG and Allianz Stadium they tell you that the curators (employees of the Sydney Cricket & Sports Ground Trust) sow a mix of grasses and cut to varying lengths to cater for the different sports to be played there - cricket and AFL in the main at the SCG and soccer and rugby & league at Allianz (cricket and soccer needing short grass, the other football codes longer grass).Comment
-
Comment
-
Re the grass, they probably kept it long because they had the reserves playing on it before hand and didn't want it to get chopped up.
Pretty sure, as per previous comment, that they stopped this happening years ago due to players being exposed (literally) on TV. AFL being AFL, they probably forgot about that.He had observed that people who did lie were, on the whole, more resourceful and ambitious and successful than people who did not lie.Comment
-
Disappointed in Sam Lane tonight on the pre game show before the WC-Melb game with her 'heroes and villains' segment, where she had the Swans as the villains for not letting Ch 7 have access to the Swans players with the other commentators heartily agreeing .....don't let the facts get in the way of a bit of mudslinging and manufactured controversy eh? I thought she was better than that, but as we've seen before, working at Ch 7 has an influence.Comment
-
MCS I seem to remember that it was Anthony Hudson who called this game and not Clinton. Hudson is a Geelong supporter, but his call was so professional, no barracking at all.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
It's not just Sydney supporters. I think you'll find the majority of followers of the game dislike a lot of ch7 commentators. Read the comments section
No Cookies | Herald Sun
The article includes the mustachoied nuff nuff saying:?Buddy has been kind enough to give us a couple of minutes as you just saw, but that is it from the Sydney Swans ? no-one else, they can?t answer the questions like ?how do you think you went today? How did you pull up? Gee, how do you think the young guys went??
?None of those questions for Sydney, far too hard, don?t want the eight or nine minutes exposure for their sponsors."
Frankly, if that's the calibre of questions then we learn absolutely nothing from the segment anyway. A pointless waste of time that is about, and really only about, placating one man's bloated, voracious and ever-demanding ego. Somehow I'm not buying that altruistic and magnanimous Brian is primarily concerned about the Swans' sponsors getting full value for their dollar. And if he actually cared about Swans fans he wouldn't say about 97% of the crap that he does.My opinion is objective truth in its purest formComment
-
The article contains a yes/no poll for readers, asking if you were disappointed there was no Roamin Brian segment on Friday. Currently running at a resounding 62% not disappointed. Cop that Brian (and barry).
The article includes the mustachoied nuff nuff saying:?Buddy has been kind enough to give us a couple of minutes as you just saw, but that is it from the Sydney Swans ? no-one else, they can?t answer the questions like ?how do you think you went today? How did you pull up? Gee, how do you think the young guys went??
?None of those questions for Sydney, far too hard, don?t want the eight or nine minutes exposure for their sponsors."
Frankly, if that's the calibre of questions then we learn absolutely nothing from the segment anyway. A pointless waste of time that is about, and really only about, placating one man's bloated, voracious and ever-demanding ego. Somehow I'm not buying that altruistic and magnanimous Brian is primarily concerned about the Swans' sponsors getting full value for their dollar. And if he actually cared about Swans fans he wouldn't say about 97% of the crap that he does.
Seems a perfectly reasonable compromise to me.Comment
-
The article contains a yes/no poll for readers, asking if you were disappointed there was no Roamin Brian segment on Friday. Currently running at a resounding 62% not disappointed. Cop that Brian (and barry).
The article includes the mustachoied nuff nuff saying:?Buddy has been kind enough to give us a couple of minutes as you just saw, but that is it from the Sydney Swans ? no-one else, they can?t answer the questions like ?how do you think you went today? How did you pull up? Gee, how do you think the young guys went??
?None of those questions for Sydney, far too hard, don?t want the eight or nine minutes exposure for their sponsors."
Frankly, if that's the calibre of questions then we learn absolutely nothing from the segment anyway. A pointless waste of time that is about, and really only about, placating one man's bloated, voracious and ever-demanding ego. Somehow I'm not buying that altruistic and magnanimous Brian is primarily concerned about the Swans' sponsors getting full value for their dollar. And if he actually cared about Swans fans he wouldn't say about 97% of the crap that he does.
Brian Taylor should watch the after match interview of Jake Lloyd on Swans TV.
Lloyd post match - Rd 14, 2017 - sydneyswans.com.au
First thing you notice is the questions are vastly superior to what Taylor would ask. And they're asked by someone who knows so much more about the Swans than Taylor does.
Secondly, during the Lloyd interview, you see Gary Rohan in the background being prepared for an interview with Fox Footy. Rohan is prepped with an ear piece and microphone by a Fox employee who treats Gary with respect and shares a joke with him. After being prepped, Rohan has to wait until they cross to him. He is still waiting patiently when the interview with Lloyd ceases.
Our players were available to talk to and would treat any media representative with respect. It would be nice to think that when approaching our club for contact, the media reps would show us the same courtesy.
Regarding our sponsors' value for money, they obviously got it on Friday night when Fox - not Channel 7 - spoke to the guy who kicked the winning goal. And with our record over the last 15 years, I'd imagine our sponsors are fairly happy with the exposure they've received.Last edited by Sandridge; 25 June 2017, 12:13 PM.Comment
-
In regards to sponsors it's not Sydney sponsors that miss out its ch7 sponsors every single week that miss out. I watch Foxtel but if the roaming interview was professionally done with good questions I'd switch over at the end of the game to watch it but with BT performing what is basically 1990's footy show comedy I have no interest in it. That type of comedy routine is dying just like the footy showComment
Comment