2019 trading, drafting and list management: players and personnel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 707
    Veterans List
    • Aug 2009
    • 6204

    Originally posted by Ralph Dawg
    I agree Liz. Taylor doesn't seem to suit our needs unless the recruiters think they can turn him into a player you provides rebound or outside run.
    Go home factor too?

    Reckon we'll draft solid citizens at 25 & 32ish, too valuable to do speculative stuff.

    Comment

    • Mountain Man
      Regular in the Side
      • Feb 2008
      • 908

      Trading picks has become the new black

      *only 8 picks of the 19 first round (GC get extra pick) remain with the original holder
      * 6 from 20 in second round (extra to GC and compensation pick)
      * 4 from 19 in third round
      *2 from 13 in fourth round

      Sydney, North Melbourne, Collingwood and Richmond generally not caught up in the frenzy.

      Comment

      • Markwebbos
        Veterans List
        • Jul 2016
        • 7186

        Originally posted by Ralph Dawg
        I agree Liz. Taylor doesn't seem to suit our needs unless the recruiters think they can turn him into a player you provides rebound or outside run.
        And we've already got one Taylor

        Comment

        • 111431
          Regular in the Side
          • Sep 2010
          • 698

          Originally posted by Mountain Man
          Trading picks has become the new black

          *only 8 picks of the 19 first round (GC get extra pick) remain with the original holder
          * 6 from 20 in second round (extra to GC and compensation pick)
          * 4 from 19 in third round
          *2 from 13 in fourth round

          Sydney, North Melbourne, Collingwood and Richmond generally not caught up in the frenzy.
          let's see what happens tomorrow?

          - - - Updated - - -

          I like Stephens. He has been playing with men and he looks like he has a touch of class about him. He is a country boy originally so go home factor shouldn't be great

          Comment

          • bloodspirit
            Clubman
            • Apr 2015
            • 4448

            A pair of topical articles from Chris Doerre:

            AFL Draft the 10 most underrated prospects

            AFL Draft Power Rankings Late bolters make their run
            All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

            Comment

            • bloodspirit
              Clubman
              • Apr 2015
              • 4448

              A couple of questions:

              1. Why is there a rule that you can't trade a pick back to the club that traded it to you? Is this the AFL's attempt to stamp out our trick yesterday to keep a second round pick and not burn it paying for Blakey? In that case, couldn't they just limit the rule to trading during the actual draft?

              2. Will trading of future picks be possible during draft night?

              3. Can clubs pre-list NGA players as rookies if they are not taken in the ND?
              All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

              Comment

              • Markwebbos
                Veterans List
                • Jul 2016
                • 7186

                Originally posted by bloodspirit
                Thanks Bloodspirit. I really like a look of several of the underrated ten, particularly Gould (I really hope he becomes a Swan), Schoenberg and Byrnes. Inside mids with good acceleration (the last two) would seem like a good fit for us. Looks like Gould, Young, Serong could be massive sliders, and Jackson, Pickett (potentially both to the Dees) the huge bolters.

                Comment

                • bloodspirit
                  Clubman
                  • Apr 2015
                  • 4448

                  Originally posted by Markwebbos
                  Thanks Bloodspirit. I really like a look of several of the underrated ten, particularly Gould (I really hope he becomes a Swan), Schoenberg and Byrnes. Inside mids with good acceleration (the last two) would seem like a good fit for us. Looks like Gould, Young, Serong could be massive sliders, and Jackson, Pickett (potentially both to the Dees) the huge bolters.
                  I agree. I have been hoping Schoenberg would be available at our second pick for a while, and also started getting optimistic that Gould might slide to us. Byrnes seems likely to go later and seems a great get. And someone posted on here weeks or months ago that the Swans were into him. Maybe someone who knows Olly Florent's parents? I don't remember exactly now. I might be mixing my stories. But I've been keeping my eyes out for news of Byrnes ever since.
                  All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

                  Comment

                  • Melbourne_Blood
                    Senior Player
                    • May 2010
                    • 3312

                    Originally posted by bloodspirit
                    I agree. I have been hoping Schoenberg would be available at our second pick for a while, and also started getting optimistic that Gould might slide to us. Byrnes seems likely to go later and seems a great get. And someone posted on here weeks or months ago that the Swans were into him. Maybe someone who knows Olly Florent's parents? I don't remember exactly now. I might be mixing my stories. But I've been keeping my eyes out for news of Byrnes ever since.
                    Yeah that was me, apparently he has been interviewed by the swans and we seem keen on him , second hand via Rachael Florent .


                    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                    Comment

                    • Markwebbos
                      Veterans List
                      • Jul 2016
                      • 7186

                      I know we need inside mids, but I wonder how many we'll draft? And whether if we do take that sort in Green, Flanders etc we'll be less likely to take more further down the draft. Or given that there are what look like quality inside mids all the way through, whether we might not draft a different sort of player with our first pick.

                      Comment

                      • bloodspirit
                        Clubman
                        • Apr 2015
                        • 4448

                        Kinnear Beatson is going to feature on afl.com.au's draft show today at 4 pm amidst a raft of other footy people: Draft Night Countdown: Watch it LIVE from 2pm AEDT - AFL.com.au. Stuey Dew's at 4.30 - which I think I will miss unfortunately.
                        All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

                        Comment

                        • bloodspirit
                          Clubman
                          • Apr 2015
                          • 4448

                          Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
                          Yeah that was me, apparently he has been interviewed by the swans and we seem keen on him , second hand via Rachael Florent .
                          Onya M_B! See, your report didn't fall into a void. I remembered! (Mostly/sort of.)

                          I hope we take two mids in the draft. I agree that we don't have a need for Elijah Taylor - but I do think he couldn't do much better than coming to learn off Buddy. And he's a Hawthorn type pick - by which I mean that Hawthorn have a tendency to pick high risk, high reward players and I think Taylor fits into that category.

                          I wish we had a second round pick 5 picks or so earlier than we do - a lot of good players seem set to disappear in that range. I think picks 10-20 will see multiple apparent bargains. I would have been open to the club trading down our pick 5 for two in this range but I remain steadfast with my faith in their approach and it will be exciting to get a real top-liner, hopefully (nearly) guaranteed winner. I don't want us to roll the dice too much with our first pick - no high risk, high reward there please! Just a sure thing.

                          Would we be amazed or upset if the club takes Fisher McAsey with our first pick?
                          All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

                          Comment

                          • stevoswan
                            Veterans List
                            • Sep 2014
                            • 8560

                            Originally posted by 111431
                            let's see what happens tomorrow?

                            - - - Updated - - -

                            I like Stephens. He has been playing with men and he looks like he has a touch of class about him. He is a country boy originally so go home factor shouldn't be great
                            Country boy eh? There's always the possibility of bushfires and a girlfriend to complicate things.....
                            Last edited by stevoswan; 26 November 2019, 11:04 AM.

                            Comment

                            • Markwebbos
                              Veterans List
                              • Jul 2016
                              • 7186

                              Originally posted by bloodspirit
                              Onya M_B! See, your report didn't fall into a void. I remembered! (Mostly/sort of.)

                              I hope we take two mids in the draft. I agree that we don't have a need for Elijah Taylor - but I do think he couldn't do much better than coming to learn off Buddy. And he's a Hawthorn type pick - by which I mean that Hawthorn have a tendency to pick high risk, high reward players and I think Taylor fits into that category.

                              I wish we had a second round pick 5 picks or so earlier than we do - a lot of good players seem set to disappear in that range. I think picks 10-20 will see multiple apparent bargains. I would have been open to the club trading down our pick 5 for two in this range but I remain steadfast with my faith in their approach and it will be exciting to get a real top-liner, hopefully (nearly) guaranteed winner. I don't want us to roll the dice too much with our first pick - no high risk, high reward there please! Just a sure thing.

                              Would we be amazed or upset if the club takes Fisher McAsey with our first pick?
                              Fisher McAsey I would be disappointed with because he's being touted as a defender, even though I think we need one, its just not as easy to get excited about a key defender as a player that could turn games e.g. Flanders, or a spectacular kick e.g. Young.

                              I like your suggestion re: trading up. Based on Twomey's phantom draft moving up 5 places would give us access to bid on or draft: Schoenberg, Maginness, Bianco, Rantall, Rivers and Gould. That's a pretty handy bunch of prospects. Another 6 places opens up (in Twomey's version): Cooper Stephens, Jones, Worrell, Henry, De Konig, Kemp and Robertson.

                              The club was active with live trading last year and I reckon we'll have plans to do it again. But I suspect that all hell is going to break loose this year as a lot of teams will be trying to trade up. Pick 19 (whatever it becomes) is going to be in huge demand overnight.

                              I think the draft will be great theatre on Wednesday night!

                              Comment

                              • bloodspirit
                                Clubman
                                • Apr 2015
                                • 4448

                                What about drafting 'Biggie'? AFL Draft Prospects - AFL.com.au Especially if we trade up the draft and have a pick slide towards the back of the draft (e.g. 25 & 32 for 19 & 67). Incidentally, I'd prefer to trade 25 & 44 and see what that might land us - or would that not get us anywhere? What a leap! And can roost it a bit by the looks of it.
                                All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

                                Comment

                                Working...