Team Changes for Round VIII v Bombers

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mel_C
    Veterans List
    • Jan 2003
    • 4470

    #76
    Originally posted by KSAS
    Reports that Joe Daniher is in doubt for tomorrow night.
    He is confirmed as out. That's a blow to the swans. I watched him live last week and he was terrible. Although knowing our luck he would have played a blinder against us.

    Fantasia has come in. Now we have to put up with BT saying his Orrraaazzioooo as well as Llllooooyyyyd.

    Comment

    • wolftone57
      Veterans List
      • Aug 2008
      • 5851

      #77
      No movement at the station. Just a simple swap of an injured player. So Horse all those blokes, who played in the last game, who were flogged by 22 points and that was flattering were good were they? Great. Let's see how much we go down by this week. I have picked Bombers by 50. But 100 would not surprise me because you have such a negative game plan we simply can't even get the ball into our forward line

      Sent from my ANE-LX2J using Tapatalk

      Comment

      • stellation
        scott names the planets
        • Sep 2003
        • 9718

        #78
        Is it common for teams nowadays to be running with backup rucks that are key position forward/backs that are actually part of the spine and not a third tall?
        I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
        We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

        Comment

        • KSAS
          Senior Player
          • Mar 2018
          • 1785

          #79
          If Buddy returns next week & all going well, he is set to play his 300th against the Hawks in 5 weeks time at the SCG on a Friday night (Round 14). Ch 7, particularly McAvaney will be rubbing their hands in glee with this outcome. Will be putting my TV in mute!

          Comment

          • Mark26
            Senior Player
            • Jan 2017
            • 1535

            #80
            Happy for COR. Let's hope he gets a real run at playing in the firsts.

            Comment

            • azzzr
              Pushing for Selection
              • Jun 2016
              • 52

              #81
              i dont want to even type this, but im calling it cameron is going to go down the path of nankers barely any game time some other club will offer him the number one role he will go and flourish whilst we stick with Sinclair and Naismith - hope im wrong though

              Comment

              • Markwebbos
                Veterans List
                • Jul 2016
                • 7186

                #82
                Originally posted by KSAS
                I'm no medical expert but I'm suspicious Buddy has a slight hamstring tear rather than strain to be missing for the 3rd week.
                He probably tripped over Sam Naismith playing frisbee on Driver Avenue and they've haven't worked out how to break it to us yet

                Comment

                • troyjones2525
                  Swans Fanatic!
                  • Mar 2008
                  • 2908

                  #83
                  Originally posted by KSAS
                  If Buddy returns next week & all going well, he is set to play his 300th against the Hawks in 5 weeks time at the SCG on a Friday night (Round 14). Ch 7, particularly McAvaney will be rubbing their hands in glee with this outcome. Will be putting my TV in mute!
                  To be honest I can't help but feel this played a part in them being a little conservative with his injury this week. And I don't have a problem with it. Will add a nice bit of theatre to his big milestone and it's not like we are really playing for anything this season anyway, other than the number 1 draft pick! [emoji16]

                  Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

                  Comment

                  • The Big Cat
                    On the veteran's list
                    • Apr 2006
                    • 2354

                    #84
                    Originally posted by troyjones2525
                    To be honest I can't help but feel this played a part in them being a little conservative with his injury this week. And I don't have a problem with it. Will add a nice bit of theatre to his big milestone and it's not like we are really playing for anything this season anyway, other than the number 1 draft pick! [emoji16]

                    Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
                    Would have played absolutely no part in the decision at all. And we are playing to make the finals, as we always are.

                    - - - Updated - - -

                    Originally posted by azzzr
                    i dont want to even type this, but im calling it cameron is going to go down the path of nankers barely any game time some other club will offer him the number one role he will go and flourish whilst we stick with Sinclair and Naismith - hope im wrong though
                    Of course they'll stay with Sinclair and Naismith, they're both AFL ruckmen. Cameron has had one go and hardly felt leather.

                    - - - Updated - - -

                    Originally posted by wolftone57
                    No movement at the station. Just a simple swap of an injured player. So Horse all those blokes, who played in the last game, who were flogged by 22 points and that was flattering were good were they? Great. Let's see how much we go down by this week. I have picked Bombers by 50. But 100 would not surprise me because you have such a negative game plan we simply can't even get the ball into our forward line

                    Sent from my ANE-LX2J using Tapatalk
                    He's not saying they were good last week, he's saying that there's nothing in the twos to improve the team. If they had brought in Clarke there would have been pandemonium on this site.
                    Those who have the greatest power to hurt us are those we love.

                    Comment

                    • Ralph Dawg
                      Senior Player
                      • Apr 2018
                      • 1729

                      #85
                      Pretty predictable change, COR in for Harry. The fact there's no radical change would indicate the coaches still are holding a faint hope we can turn things around. You never know, it might just all click on Friday (Jack 30 possessions, 10+ tackles and 3-4 goals?).

                      Comment

                      • AB Swannie
                        Senior Player
                        • Mar 2017
                        • 1579

                        #86
                        Originally posted by wolftone57
                        No movement at the station. Just a simple swap of an injured player. So Horse all those blokes, who played in the last game, who were flogged by 22 points and that was flattering were good were they? Great. Let's see how much we go down by this week. I have picked Bombers by 50. But 100 would not surprise me because you have such a negative game plan we simply can't even get the ball into our forward line

                        Sent from my ANE-LX2J using Tapatalk
                        What were you hoping for? Did you see the score from the NEAFL? Yawn.

                        Comment

                        • wolftone57
                          Veterans List
                          • Aug 2008
                          • 5851

                          #87
                          Originally posted by The Big Cat
                          Would have played absolutely no part in the decision at all. And we are playing to make the finals, as we always are.

                          - - - Updated - - -



                          Of course they'll stay with Sinclair and Naismith, they're both AFL ruckmen. Cameron has had one go and hardly felt leather.

                          - - - Updated - - -



                          He's not saying they were good last week, he's saying that there's nothing in the twos to improve the team. If they had brought in Clarke there would have been pandemonium on this site.
                          There are several players in the Twos who would match it with several of the Seniors including Jack. Rose, Cameron, Stoddart, Bell, Rowbottom and Wicks (although he might not be eligible). At least try something instead of the same boring crap who will lose by 50-100 points due to a @@@@ game plan.

                          Sent from my ANE-LX2J using Tapatalk

                          Comment

                          • wolftone57
                            Veterans List
                            • Aug 2008
                            • 5851

                            #88
                            Originally posted by Ralph Dawg
                            Pretty predictable change, COR in for Harry. The fact there's no radical change would indicate the coaches still are holding a faint hope we can turn things around. You never know, it might just all click on Friday (Jack 30 possessions, 10+ tackles and 3-4 goals?).
                            Hahaha which comedy school did you graduate from?

                            Sent from my ANE-LX2J using Tapatalk

                            Comment

                            • wolftone57
                              Veterans List
                              • Aug 2008
                              • 5851

                              #89
                              Originally posted by AB Swannie
                              What were you hoping for? Did you see the score from the NEAFL? Yawn.
                              Yes a team of toppies v 21 listed players many who have had extensive AFL experience. Sure we were gonna win that one. You expect too much from 17,18,19yo Academy boys and mostly 1st and 2nd year players.

                              Sent from my ANE-LX2J using Tapatalk

                              Comment

                              • MattW
                                Veterans List
                                • May 2011
                                • 4208

                                #90
                                Originally posted by Ralph Dawg
                                Pretty predictable change, COR in for Harry. The fact there's no radical change would indicate the coaches still are holding a faint hope we can turn things around. You never know, it might just all click on Friday (Jack 30 possessions, 10+ tackles and 3-4 goals?).
                                Haha, those were the days. Worth remembering.

                                Comment

                                Working...