Team Changes for Round VIII v Bombers

[Mel_C]

Reports that Joe Daniher is in doubt for tomorrow night.

He is confirmed as out. That's a blow to the swans. I watched him live last week and he was terrible. Although knowing our luck he would have played a blinder against us.

Fantasia has come in. Now we have to put up with BT saying his Orrraaazzioooo as well as Llllooooyyyyd.

[wolftone57]

No movement at the station. Just a simple swap of an injured player. So Horse all those blokes, who played in the last game, who were flogged by 22 points and that was flattering were good were they? Great. Let's see how much we go down by this week. I have picked Bombers by 50. But 100 would not surprise me because you have such a negative game plan we simply can't even get the ball into our forward line

Sent from my ANE-LX2J using Tapatalk

[stellation]

Is it common for teams nowadays to be running with backup rucks that are key position forward/backs that are actually part of the spine and not a third tall?

[KSAS]

If Buddy returns next week & all going well, he is set to play his 300th against the Hawks in 5 weeks time at the SCG on a Friday night (Round 14). Ch 7, particularly McAvaney will be rubbing their hands in glee with this outcome. Will be putting my TV in mute!

[Mark26]

Happy for COR. Let's hope he gets a real run at playing in the firsts.

[azzzr]

i dont want to even type this, but im calling it cameron is going to go down the path of nankers barely any game time some other club will offer him the number one role he will go and flourish whilst we stick with Sinclair and Naismith - hope im wrong though

[Markwebbos]

I'm no medical expert but I'm suspicious Buddy has a slight hamstring tear rather than strain to be missing for the 3rd week.

He probably tripped over Sam Naismith playing frisbee on Driver Avenue and they've haven't worked out how to break it to us yet

[troyjones2525]

If Buddy returns next week & all going well, he is set to play his 300th against the Hawks in 5 weeks time at the SCG on a Friday night (Round 14). Ch 7, particularly McAvaney will be rubbing their hands in glee with this outcome. Will be putting my TV in mute!

To be honest I can't help but feel this played a part in them being a little conservative with his injury this week. And I don't have a problem with it. Will add a nice bit of theatre to his big milestone and it's not like we are really playing for anything this season anyway, other than the number 1 draft pick! [emoji16]

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

[The Big Cat]

To be honest I can't help but feel this played a part in them being a little conservative with his injury this week. And I don't have a problem with it. Will add a nice bit of theatre to his big milestone and it's not like we are really playing for anything this season anyway, other than the number 1 draft pick! [emoji16]

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

Would have played absolutely no part in the decision at all. And we are playing to make the finals, as we always are.

- - - Updated - - -

i dont want to even type this, but im calling it cameron is going to go down the path of nankers barely any game time some other club will offer him the number one role he will go and flourish whilst we stick with Sinclair and Naismith - hope im wrong though

Of course they'll stay with Sinclair and Naismith, they're both AFL ruckmen. Cameron has had one go and hardly felt leather.

- - - Updated - - -

No movement at the station. Just a simple swap of an injured player. So Horse all those blokes, who played in the last game, who were flogged by 22 points and that was flattering were good were they? Great. Let's see how much we go down by this week. I have picked Bombers by 50. But 100 would not surprise me because you have such a negative game plan we simply can't even get the ball into our forward line

Sent from my ANE-LX2J using Tapatalk

He's not saying they were good last week, he's saying that there's nothing in the twos to improve the team. If they had brought in Clarke there would have been pandemonium on this site.

[Ralph Dawg]

Pretty predictable change, COR in for Harry. The fact there's no radical change would indicate the coaches still are holding a faint hope we can turn things around. You never know, it might just all click on Friday (Jack 30 possessions, 10+ tackles and 3-4 goals?).

[AB Swannie]

No movement at the station. Just a simple swap of an injured player. So Horse all those blokes, who played in the last game, who were flogged by 22 points and that was flattering were good were they? Great. Let's see how much we go down by this week. I have picked Bombers by 50. But 100 would not surprise me because you have such a negative game plan we simply can't even get the ball into our forward line

Sent from my ANE-LX2J using Tapatalk

What were you hoping for? Did you see the score from the NEAFL? Yawn.

[wolftone57]

Would have played absolutely no part in the decision at all. And we are playing to make the finals, as we always are.

- - - Updated - - -



Of course they'll stay with Sinclair and Naismith, they're both AFL ruckmen. Cameron has had one go and hardly felt leather.

- - - Updated - - -



He's not saying they were good last week, he's saying that there's nothing in the twos to improve the team. If they had brought in Clarke there would have been pandemonium on this site.

There are several players in the Twos who would match it with several of the Seniors including Jack. Rose, Cameron, Stoddart, Bell, Rowbottom and Wicks (although he might not be eligible). At least try something instead of the same boring crap who will lose by 50-100 points due to a @@@@ game plan.

Sent from my ANE-LX2J using Tapatalk

[wolftone57]

Pretty predictable change, COR in for Harry. The fact there's no radical change would indicate the coaches still are holding a faint hope we can turn things around. You never know, it might just all click on Friday (Jack 30 possessions, 10+ tackles and 3-4 goals?).

Hahaha which comedy school did you graduate from?

Sent from my ANE-LX2J using Tapatalk

[wolftone57]

What were you hoping for? Did you see the score from the NEAFL? Yawn.

Yes a team of toppies v 21 listed players many who have had extensive AFL experience. Sure we were gonna win that one. You expect too much from 17,18,19yo Academy boys and mostly 1st and 2nd year players.

Sent from my ANE-LX2J using Tapatalk

[MattW]

Pretty predictable change, COR in for Harry. The fact there's no radical change would indicate the coaches still are holding a faint hope we can turn things around. You never know, it might just all click on Friday (Jack 30 possessions, 10+ tackles and 3-4 goals?).

Haha, those were the days. Worth remembering.