2020 trading, drafting and list management: players and personnel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Blood Fever
    Veterans List
    • Apr 2007
    • 4040

    Originally posted by Markwebbos
    I think, outside of Sam N, AA has the potential to be our best ruckman and to offer the most outside of winning hitouts. And I don't think he has a spot in the backline with the move of McCartin down back. But I think he's not quite tall enough to be the main man. Happy to be proved wrong.
    When he is at the centre bounce, he wins the clearance more than some of our midfielders despite competing for the tap!

    Comment

    • giant
      Veterans List
      • Mar 2005
      • 4731

      Originally posted by MattW
      I don't see the Vezpremi comparison at all. Vezpremi look like he struggled at the level pretty much straight away, whereas Stephens clearly has class (IMO), confidence and is improving game on game. With respect, I can't even conceive of a basis you'd make that comparison.
      The comparison wasn't with Vezpremi the player, rather the selection (instead of Rioli) which arguably played a role in us losing a couple of flags. I can see Stephens' talents - I also see a bloke who constantly overruns or fumbles the ball, regularly gets caught with it with little match awareness, and despite being a gifted ball player frequently misses his targets or makes poor decisions. My point isn't to bag Stephens (though none of those aspects of his game endears him to me) - my point is that we often seem to want to pull off the miracle draft selection when a perfectly safe quality option, like Serong, is available.

      Comment

      • giant
        Veterans List
        • Mar 2005
        • 4731

        Originally posted by stellation
        Is there enough room on the SCG for Ben Brown to take his run up?
        The plus side is that when he was taking a shot you'd feel like you were a part of the action wherever you were sitting!

        Comment

        • AB Swannie
          Senior Player
          • Mar 2017
          • 1579

          Originally posted by giant
          The comparison wasn't with Vezpremi the player, rather the selection (instead of Rioli) which arguably played a role in us losing a couple of flags. I can see Stephens' talents - I also see a bloke who constantly overruns or fumbles the ball, regularly gets caught with it with little match awareness, and despite being a gifted ball player frequently misses his targets or makes poor decisions. My point isn't to bag Stephens (though none of those aspects of his game endears him to me) - my point is that we often seem to want to pull off the miracle draft selection when a perfectly safe quality option, like Serong, is available.
          FWIW, Cal Twomey rated Serong at pick 8 and Stephens at pick 9. Chris Doerre (AKA Knightmare) had Stephens ranked higher than Serong in his power rankings (Stephens 8, Serong 11). Sam Flanders was the one seen as the one who slipped.

          My point is that in hindsight it seems like Serong was a safe pick because he has come out and won the Rising Star but the people who had watched much more junior footy than you and me didn't have it the way you see it now.

          Stephens is a jet. I'm happy to hitch my wagon to his stocks as I think he will play about 150-200 more games than Vezpremi. On another note, Rioli was never an option due to his draft tampering.

          Comment

          • bennyfabulous
            Warming the Bench
            • Apr 2009
            • 351

            Originally posted by stevoswan
            Everyone who thinks we need a gun ruckman to succeed should read that article......stuff it, I'll just quote the relevant section:

            "Ruckmen in the modern game do not win you premierships. Ruckmen are the most overrated position in the game with the least influence on the outcome.

            There is a litany of examples over the past decade of premiership-winning ruckmen being a small cog in the team’s overall success. Names like Ivan Soldo, Toby Nankervis, Scott Lycett, Nathan Vardy, Jordan Roughead and Ben McEvoy are all solid citizens but absolutely nothing more. They would all be in their premiership team’s bottom six.

            There is no better example than Grundy himself in the 2019 preliminary final against GWS, which the Magpies lost. It was a game where Grundy dominated his position.

            Grundy’s numbers in that game were extraordinary. He won 73 hit-outs and ten clearances. He had 25 disposals and the Magpies dominated the clearances 54 to 35.

            If ruckmen were so influential, Collingwood should have won by ten goals. Alas, all the tap outs in the world couldn’t be converted into genuine match dominance."



            We just need a strong midfield, which we are developing already and will strengthen at this years draft (along with, hopefully, a KPF through trading....just not Daniher or Brown! I'd rather Hogan, even with the risks involved).
            A one off stats count, as an identifier of game influence is very misleading.
            Grundy would have had similar numbers in massive wins as well and been best on ground.
            Plugger would have kicked 10+ in losing games. Buddy has kicked bags in losing games. Do key forwards have no influence on matches and premierships?
            Mitchell has had games of 40+ disposals in losses, i think one time he had 50 in a loss for Hawthorn. Do mids have no influence on games/premierships?

            Stats are decieving.

            Obviously one area of the ground doesn't win games/premierships. Generally the best TEAM does.
            But i'm sure we can all agree we have had a decent midfield over the journey and it has always worked far better with a dominant/capable ruckman?

            Comment

            • Blood Fever
              Veterans List
              • Apr 2007
              • 4040

              Originally posted by giant
              The comparison wasn't with Vezpremi the player, rather the selection (instead of Rioli) which arguably played a role in us losing a couple of flags. I can see Stephens' talents - I also see a bloke who constantly overruns or fumbles the ball, regularly gets caught with it with little match awareness, and despite being a gifted ball player frequently misses his targets or makes poor decisions. My point isn't to bag Stephens (though none of those aspects of his game endears him to me) - my point is that we often seem to want to pull off the miracle draft selection when a perfectly safe quality option, like Serong, is available.
              Disagree entirely. I see a potential gun with speed, an elite tank and lovely disposal. And match awareness.

              Comment

              • MattW
                Veterans List
                • May 2011
                • 4195

                Originally posted by The Runner
                Unfortunately we don't have a version of Woj from ESPN in Australia. So, until the player or club comments, sources are useless.
                Haha - the thought of Tim Watson performing the same function as Woj.

                Comment

                • MattW
                  Veterans List
                  • May 2011
                  • 4195

                  Originally posted by Ludwig
                  With GWS, Geelong and us all looking for a ruckman, it's not going to be easy to get someone we're happy with. A lot hangs on what happens with Daniher, as he's one of the better stand in ruckman for a forward. So if he comes to us, Joe, Sinclair, Reid and Aliir can all do reasonable jobs pretending to be ruckmen. We might be able to get by. Maybe we can get Thilthorpe in the draft. There are some options around other than Preuss, who I don't see as a good long term solution. We still want someone quick in the middle.
                  Thilthorpe is 'only' 200cm. Unless there's a growth spurt he's not going to be a genuine ruckman either.

                  Comment

                  • MattW
                    Veterans List
                    • May 2011
                    • 4195

                    Originally posted by giant
                    The comparison wasn't with Vezpremi the player, rather the selection (instead of Rioli) which arguably played a role in us losing a couple of flags. I can see Stephens' talents - I also see a bloke who constantly overruns or fumbles the ball, regularly gets caught with it with little match awareness, and despite being a gifted ball player frequently misses his targets or makes poor decisions. My point isn't to bag Stephens (though none of those aspects of his game endears him to me) - my point is that we often seem to want to pull off the miracle draft selection when a perfectly safe quality option, like Serong, is available.
                    I think you're way too harsh on a first year player. Best tank in the club and one of the fastest; runs hard to space; tackles well for a spindly lad; attacks with the ball.

                    Highlights from the most recent game
                    - running to get the handball receive 12.20 in first quarter
                    - enjoyed the pass 15.24 into the first quarter
                    - handball at 12.24 in the third quarter



                    Kicked the classiest most enjoyable goal of the year: 14.51 of the fourth quarter:


                    I think the rationale may have been that in light of Gulden and Campbell coming in 2020, let's seek a point of difference. @@@@ing nailed it in my view.

                    Comment

                    • Syd76
                      Warming the Bench
                      • Jul 2019
                      • 200

                      I agree with you Matt. KB and SD are looking at things from a 2 to 3 year perspective. I was initially very disappointed that we didn't draft Serong given he was a Swans fan. However, given the production line that we have in our own backyard, knowing what we know about Campbell and Gulden, KB/SD picked a player who we know will be a class player, who is different to those that they are to draft this year.

                      Hence, Stephens, who I liken to Gaff (and will be hopefully be much better), will be a hybrid wing/mid that we haven't had for a while.

                      The interesting thing is who will we pick up with our Pick 3 (Pick 4 once the Dogs match for JUH). My pick is Grainger-Barass/Logan McDonald for the Swans if whichever is still available (if we do not get a JD or contemplate a Ben Brown etc, I think we would prefer Logan McDonald).

                      1. Dogs: JUH
                      2. Crows: Thilthorpe (because he is a Adelaide Boy)
                      3. North: Elijah Hollands (because he will be a solid midfielder - North have many tall types but lack midfield options particularly if they lose Higgins) or Grainger-Barrass
                      4. Swans: Logan McDonald or Grainger-Barass

                      They only missing piece after this is a ruck. As much as I respect Naismith (and think he is a good ruckman) he is too injury prone. He will be out for the majority of next year and will find it difficult being retained on the list (particularly if we have to cull a few). Sinclair does not do it for me (goes missing and is beaten by quality rucks). Was hoping to see Knoll, but obviously he wasn't good enough.

                      Time will tell

                      Comment

                      • SwanSand
                        Regular in the Side
                        • Aug 2020
                        • 523

                        North will probably give up the pick 3 and split it into 2 first round selection if they don’t have any more. I wouldn’t be surprised that they will make the deal with Geelong - Shaun Higgins along with pick 3 and in return get Multiple quality picks.
                        If this happens Geelong will go for Logan McDonald given Tom Hawkins is nearing the end.
                        Elijah for us I think.

                        Comment

                        • Auntie.Gerald
                          Veterans List
                          • Oct 2009
                          • 6474

                          * Current as of end of home and away season Sydney has 3,22,54,56

                          1 Adelaide Crows
                          2 North Melbourne
                          3 Sydney Swans
                          4 Hawthorn
                          5 Gold Coast Suns
                          6 Essendon
                          7 Carlton
                          8 Adelaide Crows
                          9 North Melbourne
                          10 Geelong
                          11 Fremantle
                          12 Collingwood
                          13 Western Bulldogs
                          14 St Kilda
                          15 Geelong Cats
                          16 Geelong Cats
                          17 Richmond
                          18 Brisbane Lions
                          19 Brisbane Lions
                          20 Adelaide Crows
                          21 Hawthorn
                          22 Sydney Swans
                          23 Melbourne
                          24 Gold Coast Suns
                          25 North Melbourne
                          26 Port Adelaide
                          27 Carlton
                          28 Fremantle
                          29 Port Adelaide
                          30 Adelaide Crows
                          31 Richmond
                          32 West Coast Eagles
                          33 Geelong Cats
                          34 Collingwood
                          35 Gold Coast Suns
                          36 Western Bulldogs
                          37 Collingwood
                          38 Brisbane Lions
                          39 Hawthorn
                          40 GWS Giants
                          41 Essendon
                          42 Hawthorn
                          43 Port Adelaide
                          44 Adelaide Crows
                          45 Carlton
                          46 GWS Giants
                          47 Melbourne
                          48 Adelaide Crows
                          49 Western Bulldogs
                          50 Port Adelaide
                          51 West Coast Eagles
                          52 West Coast Eagles
                          53 Richmond
                          54 Sydney
                          55 Port Adelaide
                          56 Sydney
                          57 North Melbourne
                          58 St Kilda
                          59 Hawthorn
                          60 Adelaide Crows
                          61 Essendon
                          62 Melbourne
                          63 Melbourne
                          64 Brisbane Lions
                          65 North Melbourne
                          66 GWS Giants
                          67 Hawthorn
                          68 Collingwood
                          69 Essendon
                          70 Essendon
                          71 Richmond
                          72 Gold Coast Suns
                          73 St Kilda
                          "be tough, only when it gets tough"

                          Comment

                          • Melbourne_Blood
                            Senior Player
                            • May 2010
                            • 3312

                            Originally posted by Syd76
                            I agree with you Matt. KB and SD are looking at things from a 2 to 3 year perspective. I was initially very disappointed that we didn't draft Serong given he was a Swans fan. However, given the production line that we have in our own backyard, knowing what we know about Campbell and Gulden, KB/SD picked a player who we know will be a class player, who is different to those that they are to draft this year.

                            Hence, Stephens, who I liken to Gaff (and will be hopefully be much better), will be a hybrid wing/mid that we haven't had for a while.

                            The interesting thing is who will we pick up with our Pick 3 (Pick 4 once the Dogs match for JUH). My pick is Grainger-Barass/Logan McDonald for the Swans if whichever is still available (if we do not get a JD or contemplate a Ben Brown etc, I think we would prefer Logan McDonald).

                            1. Dogs: JUH
                            2. Crows: Thilthorpe (because he is a Adelaide Boy)
                            3. North: Elijah Hollands (because he will be a solid midfielder - North have many tall types but lack midfield options particularly if they lose Higgins) or Grainger-Barrass
                            4. Swans: Logan McDonald or Grainger-Barass

                            They only missing piece after this is a ruck. As much as I respect Naismith (and think he is a good ruckman) he is too injury prone. He will be out for the majority of next year and will find it difficult being retained on the list (particularly if we have to cull a few). Sinclair does not do it for me (goes missing and is beaten by quality rucks). Was hoping to see Knoll, but obviously he wasn't good enough.

                            Time will tell
                            Originally posted by SwanSand
                            North will probably give up the pick 3 and split it into 2 first round selection if they don’t have any more. I wouldn’t be surprised that they will make the deal with Geelong - Shaun Higgins along with pick 3 and in return get Multiple quality picks.
                            If this happens Geelong will go for Logan McDonald given Tom Hawkins is nearing the end.
                            Elijah for us I think.
                            North have 3 picks inside the first 25, 2 of which are first rounders. Why would they trade pick 3?


                            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                            Comment

                            • Markwebbos
                              Veterans List
                              • Jul 2016
                              • 7186

                              Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
                              North have 3 picks inside the first 25, 2 of which are first rounders. Why would they trade pick 3?


                              Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                              If we could get more points from elsewhere why not offer 3 and 22 for pick 2?

                              Comment

                              • waswan
                                Senior Player
                                • Oct 2015
                                • 2047

                                Serong/Stephens is not an issue at the moment and may never be an issue, 9 times out of 10 you pick the Swans fan but Stephens doesnt appear to be a flight risk.

                                Rucks
                                There are 3 rucks in the comp, Gawn/Grundy/Nicnat that inflate the value of the rest of the rucks.
                                Having one of these is a diference maker, most of the others are just toilers that negate each other.

                                Drafting Rucks
                                English has fooled everyone with his development, he is soon to be in the above group but is 3yrs ahead of the curve for development.

                                Drafting Rucks with a top 5 pick
                                Madness, 5 yrs from a payoff if they stay injury free and even then its still speculative.

                                Sydneys Ruck situation
                                We need a ruck now not in 5yrs
                                Melb, with Gawn, have the luxury of not having to play Macdonald in the ruck, if at all only short spurts ours would have to play ruck.

                                Top 3 Pick
                                Last rating has 4 of the top 5 picks as Key Position, we could essentially get the best rated mid in the draft, 2 of the best 4 if you include Cambpell, you have to take that everytime. Freo did it with Brayshaw and Cerra and it is paying dividends

                                Comment

                                Working...