2021 trading, drafting and list management: players and personnel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Bangalore Swans
    Suspended by the MRP
    • Mar 2021
    • 1049

    Is this the most critical 4 hours in Reid’s career?

    Comment

    • i'm-uninformed2
      Reefer Madness
      • Oct 2003
      • 4653

      Originally posted by Bangalore Swans
      Is this the most critical 4 hours in Reid’s career?
      I'd argue there was two and a bit hours in September 2012 that surpass it, but get your point
      'Delicious' is a fun word to say

      Comment

      • Bangalore Swans
        Suspended by the MRP
        • Mar 2021
        • 1049

        Originally posted by i'm-uninformed2
        I'd argue there was two and a bit hours in September 2012 that surpass it, but get your point
        Yep. That mark from the kick out late in the 4th quarter was a much valued contribution.

        Comment

        • i'm-uninformed2
          Reefer Madness
          • Oct 2003
          • 4653

          Originally posted by Aprilbr
          Gardiner saying on trade radio that last week's offer was much worse than pick 17 due to adverse other pick swaps involved.
          In other words, Adelaide never negotiated in good faith, because they didn't have to, because they had the PSD threat, and a player who stabbed us in the back on the way out.

          - - - Updated - - -

          Originally posted by Bangalore Swans
          Yep. That mark from the kick out late in the 4th quarter was a much valued contribution.
          Or the goal on the run from 50m at the end of the dream passage of play started by Alex Johnson (cry) in the 2nd quarter
          'Delicious' is a fun word to say

          Comment

          • Bangalore Swans
            Suspended by the MRP
            • Mar 2021
            • 1049

            If we do get Ladhams, should the Swans try and do a deal with St Kilda for McLean?

            Ladhams puts McLean and Amarty further down the depth list for key forwards.

            Comment

            • mcs
              Travelling Swannie!!
              • Jul 2007
              • 8149

              Originally posted by Aprilbr
              Here is exactly what Charlie said about Adelaide's initial offer last week:

              ."The final offer Sydney accepted was “significantly better” than what the Crows initially offered early last week.
              “In terms of the negotiations, what I can say is the deal that was tabled on Tuesday last week involving pick 17 was not as good a deal as we accepted last night,” Gardiner said.
              “It involved a slide of picks in this year’s draft together with future selections given up in next year’s draft that would have compromised not only this year, but next year."
              Sounds like Adelaide did nothing but put straw men offers up. No suprises there.
              "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

              Comment

              • 0918330512
                Senior Player
                • Sep 2011
                • 1654

                Originally posted by Bangalore Swans
                Is this the most critical 4 hours in Reid’s career?
                Originally posted by i'm-uninformed2
                I'd argue there was two and a bit hours in September 2012 that surpass it, but get your point
                I’d argue that most here have been critical of Reid’s career for the last 4 years, not 4 hours

                - - - Updated - - -

                Originally posted by Bangalore Swans
                If we do get Ladhams, should the Swans try and do a deal with St Kilda for McLean?
                WTAF, put up a player that just re-signed?!

                Originally posted by Bangalore Swans
                Ladhams puts McLean and Amarty further down the depth list for key forwards.
                Or, both Amartey and McLean could diversify their roles to differ from Ladhams, considering neither Joel nor Hayden are or will be first string ruckmen, and are thus not likely competing for the same position as Ladhams.
                Last edited by 0918330512; 13 October 2021, 02:54 PM.

                Comment

                • Roadrunner
                  Senior Player
                  • Jan 2018
                  • 1447

                  Originally posted by Bangalore Swans
                  If we do get Ladhams, should the Swans try and do a deal with St Kilda for McLean?

                  Ladhams puts McLean and Amarty further down the depth list for key forwards.
                  Not on your sweet bippy, Bangalore! We need all the tall timber we can get- competition plus cover for injuries.
                  Why trade McLean, who is more than useful and with upside?

                  Comment

                  • bloodspirit
                    Clubman
                    • Apr 2015
                    • 4448

                    The most critical hours of Sam Reid's career would surely have been on draft night 2009!
                    All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

                    Comment

                    • dejavoodoo44
                      Veterans List
                      • Apr 2015
                      • 8492

                      The AFL site strangely reported that the Giants were interested in sending pick 13 to Hawthorn, in exchange for Luke Breust?? Not long after, they claimed that the deal was off, because Breust wants to stay at Hawthorn. Personally, I suspect that they got the story very wrong? I mean: pick 13 for a 30 year old small forward?

                      However, if the Giants are actually that desperate to increase their small forward stocks, then perhaps they'd be interested in Ronke or Taylor?

                      Comment

                      • Roadrunner
                        Senior Player
                        • Jan 2018
                        • 1447

                        Is Port holding up the Ladhams deal? Nearly 4 o’clock, surely we won’t bend over! KB and team- we’re relying on you to get it done!

                        Comment

                        • Markwebbos
                          Veterans List
                          • Jul 2016
                          • 7186

                          Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
                          The AFL site strangely reported that the Giants were interested in sending pick 13 to Hawthorn, in exchange for Luke Breust?? Not long after, they claimed that the deal was off, because Breust wants to stay at Hawthorn. Personally, I suspect that they got the story very wrong? I mean: pick 13 for a 30 year old small forward?

                          However, if the Giants are actually that desperate to increase their small forward stocks, then perhaps they'd be interested in Ronke or Taylor?
                          I think there is a catch to these Hawthorn deals, which is that they'd be buying the pick by paying the player's entire salary for next year or even beyond. I wonder if the Giants think they can get a Breust or Wingard for free. Offload Bobby Hill for a future second round pick and use that and the saved $$ to have another crack at Lobb. I believe the sticking point was that the Giants couldn't offer him enough money or enough $$ for long enough. Future 2nd rounder was the offer for Lobb, so they could turn Hill into Lobb and Breust by sending pick 13 to the Hawks.

                          Comment

                          • Roadrunner
                            Senior Player
                            • Jan 2018
                            • 1447

                            Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
                            The AFL site strangely reported that the Giants were interested in sending pick 13 to Hawthorn, in exchange for Luke Breust?? Not long after, they claimed that the deal was off, because Breust wants to stay at Hawthorn. Personally, I suspect that they got the story very wrong? I mean: pick 13 for a 30 year old small forward?

                            However, if the Giants are actually that desperate to increase their small forward stocks, then perhaps they'd be interested in Ronke or Taylor?
                            Deja, I’ll personally drive Ronke to the Giants (well, a bit hard at present as I’m in Melbourne) but want to keep Squizzy for another year.

                            Comment

                            • dejavoodoo44
                              Veterans List
                              • Apr 2015
                              • 8492

                              Originally posted by Markwebbos
                              I think there is a catch to these Hawthorn deals, which is that they'd be buying the pick by paying the player's entire salary for next year or even beyond. I wonder if the Giants think they can get a Breust or Wingard for free. Offload Bobby Hill for a future second round pick and use that and the saved $$ to have another crack at Lobb. I believe the sticking point was that the Giants couldn't offer him enough money or enough $$ for long enough. Future 2nd rounder was the offer for Lobb, so they could turn Hill into Lobb and Breust by sending pick 13 to the Hawks.
                              Yes, that does sound quite Hawthorn-ish or Kennett-ish. It also sounds quite Kennett-ish, to not sound out the player involved beforehand.

                              Comment

                              • Markwebbos
                                Veterans List
                                • Jul 2016
                                • 7186

                                Originally posted by dejavoodoo44
                                Yes, that does sound quite Hawthorn-ish or Kennett-ish. It also sounds quite Kennett-ish, to not sound out the player involved beforehand.
                                It could be a calculated move by the Giants to create disharmony at the Hawks

                                Comment

                                Working...