Best 22 Round 1 2022

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bloodspirit
    Clubman
    • Apr 2015
    • 4448

    Originally posted by TheBloods
    You can tell a lot from these athletes body language . I said this last year and got torn to shreds for it ,

    Opponents know it too , they see their opponent looking like he 'd rather be in Phuket and they know they have the edge over them

    Not a good sign if he isnt looking plugged in at training
    I took this as a joke by stevo. I don't think he's seen the team in person since he's based in Melbourne.
    All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

    Comment

    • Bangalore Swans
      Suspended by the MRP
      • Mar 2021
      • 1049

      Originally posted by stevoswan
      Just for you BS......Alan Pease here. I have noticed in the training videos that Ladham's 'body language' is a bit of a worry. He doesn't seem naturally happy and relaxed like the other players. Sure, he is under pressure to prove himself and it takes awhile to settle in at a new club but I have not been too impressed with what I've witnessed from the few bits of training I've seen.

      The key here is 'the few bits of training I've seen'. There's not really a lot to go on, so I might be way off in my assessment.

      NB: This is not a prediction that he is going to leave. I'm not that good this early.......but if he's not in the team in Round 1, there might be cause for some concern re; the validity of his recruitment.

      Very early days though.
      One eyewitness account (my best mate) and Stevos excellent body analysis has led to a conclusion that Ladhams is performing below training expectations.

      Can anyone else who watches training confirm that Ladhams is below training expectations?

      Agree with Stevo and TheBloods about the importance of reading body language to Allan Pease levels. You can tell exactly how a footballer is thinking.

      Comment

      • bloodspirit
        Clubman
        • Apr 2015
        • 4448

        I've watched training but I really couldn't tell you, and to be honest I haven't particularly been watching Ladhams. From what I've seen he's doing alright. Is quite agile and involved at ground level for a guy his size.
        All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

        Comment

        • Aprilbr
          Senior Player
          • Oct 2016
          • 1803

          Originally posted by Bangalore Swans
          Most posters on here are favouring Paddy McCartin over Melican for round 1. Makes sense to go with McCartin as his brilliant kicking ads another weapon to the Swans counter attacking, switch, corridor and overlap run game.

          McCartins play will be more attacking and entertaining than Melican as a fan I want more attacking and entertaining play like 2021.

          Nobody can argue conclusively about Melican’s defensive game after Jesse Hogan of all players destroyed him.
          You may get your wish about PMc, BS. It would appear that Melican is not named in the large squad for the Practice game in Albury tomorrow. Perhaps his fitness is not right? Looking good for Paddy now.

          Comment

          • mcs
            Travelling Swannie!!
            • Jul 2007
            • 8168

            Originally posted by TheBloods
            You can tell a lot from these athletes body language . I said this last year and got torn to shreds for it ,

            Opponents know it too , they see their opponent looking like he 'd rather be in Phuket and they know they have the edge over them

            Not a good sign if he isnt looking plugged in at training
            "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

            Comment

            • Ralph Dawg
              Senior Player
              • Apr 2018
              • 1729

              After one rusty trial, here's my latest go:

              B Cunningham TMac Rampe
              HB Lloyd PMac Blakey
              C JMac Chad Florent
              HF Heeney LMac Gulden
              F Wicks Buddy Hayward
              Foll Hickey JPK Parker
              Int Ladhams Rowbum Stephens Campbell

              Injuries Mills Papley - first out(S) if either / both fit will be Stephens and Campbell. With Paps out, Heeney has to play forward.

              Tempted to play Sheldrick for Wicks in the small forward role. Kid clearly has ticker, looks in great shape and is a lovely kick for goal. Wicks was lively at times but his goal kicking looks like it's continuing where it left off last year.

              Comment

              • 707
                Veterans List
                • Aug 2009
                • 6204

                I reckon players like Roberts and Sheldrick need to show more than the incumbents to start round 1 and they aren't doing that on last night's Q5/6 giggle.

                Mills and Papley, if fit, obviously come in, but not sure who gets pushed to the Medical Sub position to make way for them.

                Comment

                • bloodspirit
                  Clubman
                  • Apr 2015
                  • 4448

                  Ralph, did you mean to leave Warner out? Otherwise, great team.
                  All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)

                  Comment

                  • Ralph Dawg
                    Senior Player
                    • Apr 2018
                    • 1729

                    Originally posted by bloodspirit
                    Ralph, did you mean to leave Warner out? Otherwise, great team.
                    He's there as Chad

                    Comment

                    • Blood Relative
                      Warming the Bench
                      • Oct 2018
                      • 155

                      B; Cunningham, Melican, Lloyd
                      HB; Blakey, Mc Cartin T., Rampe
                      C; McInerny, Heeney, Rowbottom
                      HF; Hayward, McLean, Warner
                      F; Gulden, Franklin, Ladhams
                      Foll; Hickey, Parker, Kennedy
                      Int; Florent, Clarke, Stephens, O'Riordan
                      Emerg; McCartin P, Wicks, Bell, Fox

                      The most significant line is the emergencies. All players in the 22 are good enough to keep out those on the last line

                      Cheer, Cheer

                      Comment

                      • Bexl
                        Regular in the Side
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 817

                        Originally posted by Blood Relative
                        B; Cunningham, Melican, Lloyd
                        HB; Blakey, Mc Cartin T., Rampe
                        C; McInerny, Heeney, Rowbottom
                        HF; Hayward, McLean, Warner
                        F; Gulden, Franklin, Ladhams
                        Foll; Hickey, Parker, Kennedy
                        Int; Florent, Clarke, Stephens, O'Riordan
                        Emerg; McCartin P, Wicks, Bell, Fox

                        The most significant line is the emergencies. All players in the 22 are good enough to keep out those on the last line

                        Cheer, Cheer
                        Interesting you've gone a different way than everybody else by putting Clark in your team I presume as a tagger

                        Comment

                        • liz
                          Veteran
                          Site Admin
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 16778

                          I presume that's intended as a possible round 1 team, rather than a "best 22", given the absence of Mills and Papley.

                          I think we'll need to suffer a fair few more injuries between now and then before Clarke gets a look in. And while that's my opinion, I believe it's also the coaches' since we got a fair idea of the pecking order from those who were left on the bench until the very end. I suspect Roberts and maybe Sheldrick would be picked ahead of Clarke (though not before Wicks).

                          Melican and COR were absent altogether from Friday's squad, suggesting they may be overcoming an injury. Even if Melican is available, I think he's got his work cut out to inch ahead of McCartin by the start of the season, though it's not out of the question.

                          And if COR were available, I think the coaches would think long and hard before picking between him and Campbell (and would likely go for Campbell, though I wouldn't necessarily).

                          Comment

                          • Blood Relative
                            Warming the Bench
                            • Oct 2018
                            • 155

                            Bexl & Liz are both correct!

                            Comment

                            • Ludwig
                              Veterans List
                              • Apr 2007
                              • 9359

                              I read somewhere that 2 players were out due to concussion. COR was one of them, but forgot who the other was.

                              Comment

                              • sahi
                                On the Rookie List
                                • Nov 2011
                                • 22

                                Corey Warner

                                Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

                                Comment

                                Working...