Club sponsorship and value conflicts

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kafka's Ghost
    Regular in the Side
    • Sep 2017
    • 899

    Originally posted by Mr Magoo
    Strawman argument - that wasnt my point. Gina reinhart never purported to control anything but if you would like to live in a country where the government controls everything , there are some fine countries around the world where you can go . Its always been an overwhelming success.

    Even here in Australia , governments have proven in the past that they are just so efficient in spending your money .
    You’ve lost the plot starting to come out with that “go live somewhere else” c@&p. This is a great decision for women’s sport, which is equally as deserving of support as men’s sport. If you believe governments don’t spend money on men’s sport, there’s a stadium next to the SCG I’m willing to sell you.
    As for governments spending money on useless projects, there’s no shortage across the spectrum. Better an investment in human capital and future tourism than feathering Gerry Harvey’s bank balance.


    Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk

    Comment

    • Meg
      Go Swannies!
      Site Admin
      • Aug 2011
      • 4828

      Club sponsorship and value conflicts

      Originally posted by BRS328
      It is an absolute disgrace when a government of any persuasion can wilfully give away taxpayers money.
      This is a two-party contract.

      In return for the $15 million over five years Victoria will get:

      . Vic tourism branding including logo on netballers uniforms
      . Players and coaches involved in tourism campaigns, of particular relevance in build-up to Commonwealth Games - in which netball is a significant event - in four regional Victorian towns in 2026
      . Netball will play five Test matches and hold their high performance camps in Victoria between 2023 and 2026
      . the Super Netball GF will be held in Vic in 2023
      . Support for grassroots netball particularly in culturally diverse communities.


      You and others may not agree these provide sufficient return, but it isn’t accurate to describe the sponsorship as simply a ‘give away’.

      Comment

      • Kafka's Ghost
        Regular in the Side
        • Sep 2017
        • 899

        Originally posted by Meg
        This is a two-party contract.

        In return for the $15 million over five years Victoria will get:

        . Vic tourism branding including logo on netballers uniforms
        . Players and coaches involved in tourism campaigns, of particular relevance in build-up to Commonwealth Games - in which netball is a significant event - in four regional Victorian towns in 2026
        . Netball will play five Test matches and hold their high performance camps in Victoria between 2023 and 2026
        . the Super Netball GF will be held in Vic in 2023
        . Support for grassroots netball particularly in culturally diverse communities.


        You and others may not agree these provide sufficient return, but it isn’t accurate to describe the sponsorship as simply a ‘give away’.

        https://www.smh.com.au/sport/netball...31-p5bubg.html
        Thanks for this extensive explanation of the support the Diamonds are getting, Meg. It certainly is a two-way street, as it always is.


        Gesendet von iPhone mit Tapatalk

        Comment

        • KTigers
          Senior Player
          • Apr 2012
          • 2499

          C'mon folks, it's very rare for any sport or sportsperson or team (including ours) not to put their hand out for money from
          pretty much anywhere. I get it, it's nice to sit around and think your team or sport or even you yourself are all squeaky
          clean and upstanding. But it's bull@@@@ really. And we all kinda know it. With footy, I just concentrate on what happens on
          the field. It's just more fun than the stuff that enabled the game to take place in the first place. That's called the real world.
          I already knew about that.

          Comment

          • Markwebbos
            Veterans List
            • Jul 2016
            • 7186

            Except KTigers there are fans and players who don’t feel like you.

            We have a right to object to the Swans taking money from a despotic regime.

            Indigenous players have a right to refuse to wear the logo of an organisation whose founder advocated their genocide.

            Comment

            • KTigers
              Senior Player
              • Apr 2012
              • 2499

              Of course there are. And of course you do. Clearly I think it's a bit of a fantasy that football players (and netballers) are going to bite
              the hand that feeds them the large bulk of the time. But very occasionally they will, and that's fine. But Pat Cummins taking a 10%
              paycut (or Isaac Heeney taking a 20% pay cut as he did in 2020) is going to hurt them a whole lot less than the average Joe Schmo
              working in club admin for $70K a year and lives paycheck to paycheck is going to be hurt by losing all his or her income.
              I can see how the netball player thought wearing the Rinehart company logo was a bridge too far for her.

              Comment

              • barry
                Veterans List
                • Jan 2003
                • 8499

                This little saga just goes to show that if the executives of these sporting organisations just put a little bit more effort in there are plenty of good companies willing to sponsor them.

                Don't just take the first dubious one that comes along, and spend the rest of the week taking long lunches

                Comment

                • Markwebbos
                  Veterans List
                  • Jul 2016
                  • 7186

                  Originally posted by KTigers
                  Of course there are. And of course you do. Clearly I think it's a bit of a fantasy that football players (and netballers) are going to bite
                  the hand that feeds them the large bulk of the time. But very occasionally they will, and that's fine. But Pat Cummins taking a 10%
                  paycut (or Isaac Heeney taking a 20% pay cut as he did in 2020) is going to hurt them a whole lot less than the average Joe Schmo
                  working in club admin for $70K a year and lives paycheck to paycheck is going to be hurt by losing all his or her income.
                  I can see how the netball player thought wearing the Rinehart company logo was a bridge too far for her.
                  I don’t accept that it’s EITHER money OR principle. And I think Netball Australia demonstrates that.

                  Comment

                  • BRS328
                    Warming the Bench
                    • Feb 2018
                    • 346

                    Let’s be frank about it. Netball Australia screwed this up and no doubt would have handled it differently should a similar situation arise again. They were very lucky the Victorian Tax Payers bailed them out.
                    All sporting clubs will have learnt from this.

                    Comment

                    • aardvark
                      Veterans List
                      • Mar 2010
                      • 5685

                      Originally posted by Meg
                      This is a two-party contract.

                      In return for the $15 million over five years Victoria will get:

                      . Vic tourism branding including logo on netballers uniforms
                      . Players and coaches involved in tourism campaigns, of particular relevance in build-up to Commonwealth Games - in which netball is a significant event - in four regional Victorian towns in 2026
                      . Netball will play five Test matches and hold their high performance camps in Victoria between 2023 and 2026
                      . the Super Netball GF will be held in Vic in 2023
                      . Support for grassroots netball particularly in culturally diverse communities.


                      You and others may not agree these provide sufficient return, but it isn’t accurate to describe the sponsorship as simply a ‘give away’.

                      https://www.smh.com.au/sport/netball...31-p5bubg.html
                      Meg you know you shouldn't let facts get in the way of emotive rants!

                      Comment

                      • stevoswan
                        Veterans List
                        • Sep 2014
                        • 8543

                        Originally posted by Mr Magoo
                        You are kidding right - government sponsorship from Dan Andrews government is not corporate sponsorship - its hardly a lesson for anyone except that the most left leaning government entity in Australia is doing exactly what left leaning governments always do and would love to see - government control of everything.
                        Don't tell me that you're one of the _____s that call Dan Andrews "Dictator Dan"? FFS....give that right wing crap a rest.

                        - - - Updated - - -

                        Originally posted by aardvark
                        I'd rather see a democratically elected Government control everything than Gina R.
                        +1

                        - - - Updated - - -

                        Originally posted by BRS328
                        It is an absolute disgrace when a government of any persuasion can wilfully give away taxpayers money. Victoria currently has a projected $9.7 billion debt for the current year, which equates to $1.45 million for each man, woman and child living in the state. You simply cannot call this responsible management.
                        What was the federal deficit at the end of the Morrison govt?

                        Comment

                        • stevoswan
                          Veterans List
                          • Sep 2014
                          • 8543

                          Originally posted by Mr Magoo
                          Strawman argument - that wasnt my point. Gina reinhart never purported to control anything but if you would like to live in a country where the government controls everything , there are some fine countries around the world where you can go . Its always been an overwhelming success.

                          Even here in Australia , governments have proven in the past that they are just so efficient in spending your money .
                          Yeah right....because privately owned power is going so well for us all isn't it?! Because privately owned gas supply is working so well for Australia isn't it? Open your eyes.....capitalism doesn't work for the people, it only works for the rich.

                          Are you one of 'them'?

                          Comment

                          • stevoswan
                            Veterans List
                            • Sep 2014
                            • 8543

                            Originally posted by Kafka's Ghost
                            Thanks for this extensive explanation of the support the Diamonds are getting, Meg. It certainly is a two-way street, as it always is.

                            Unfortunately, 'some' in today's society can only see 'one' way.

                            Sad.

                            Comment

                            • liz
                              Veteran
                              Site Admin
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 16735

                              Please take all the non-sports related, overtly political and/or value-systems discussion to Open Chat.

                              Comment

                              • Captain
                                Captain of the Side
                                • Feb 2004
                                • 3602

                                Originally posted by stevoswan
                                Yeah right....because privately owned power is going so well for us all isn't it?! Because privately owned gas supply is working so well for Australia isn't it? Open your eyes.....capitalism doesn't work for the people, it only works for the rich.

                                Are you one of 'them'?
                                How is this post allowed to stay but the mods delete responses to it???

                                Comment

                                Working...