If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Gary Rohan.... matchwinner. 3.1 and 14 touches.
Most likely outcome ; We'll play Collingwood in the Prelim, then Geelong in the GF.
I wouldn't be suprised if the Pies are cooked after tonight and Freo get through to the prelim. But its all speculation and I've thought the Pies have been overrated all year (tonight did prove me wrong tho)
I wouldn't be suprised if the Pies are cooked after tonight and Freo get through to the prelim. But its all speculation and I've thought the Pies have been overrated all year (tonight did prove me wrong tho)
That'd be ideal. I think we could really roll Freo at home. They are 4-1-13 at the SCG.
You mean the person in the best position to know? If you were going to trust anyone in that situation, it would have to be the goal umpire.
The criticisms I am reading of the review system in the ARC all seem to be based solely on viewing the camera footage that we see on the big screen.
But isn’t it the case that in the ARC they use Hawk-Eye technology on the camera vision to track the ball path over the goal line?
I assume this would be similar to the ball tracking used in tennis.
I believe that Hawk-Eye is extremely accurate but it does depend on the quality of the camera vision that is provided by the fixed cameras at the grounds and the vision provided by the TV camera operators.
The AFL certainly trialled Hawk-Eye back in 2013 (so nearly ten years ago). I don’t know what happened subsequently but that article I linked earlier says:
“Each game has a team of three on watch: a controller, who operates the camera angles and the Hawk-Eye technology; an analyst, who calls out what they see; and a supervisor.”
I wish someone would write an article that clearly explains how the review system is conducted. The one I reference only partly does that.
And I would have hoped AFL commentators would have invested effort into understanding it .....
But isn’t it the case that in the ARC they use Hawk-Eye technology on the camera vision to track the ball path over the goal line?
I had no idea that was in operation. Although, if that is the case then why wouldn’t it be a feature of the process that we see? I really don’t have much faith in the supposed certainty that we are presented with right now.
Also, isn’t the point of doing all this more for the perception than the reality? If the public doesn’t see the proof in an overturned decision surely it only adds to the controversy rather than helping to clear it up.
Comment