Qualifying Final vs Melbourne Demons @ MCG Match Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • longmile
    Crumber
    • Apr 2011
    • 3365

    Such a shame about McInerney. My GF and I joke that he lost his mojo when he cut off his beautiful long locks. However, more credibly it seems his drop off in form corelates with when he had COVID. Perhaps he is having some long COVID effects like lethargy etc because he is a shade of his former self.

    Like others here I think he is our worst player at the moment by a long shot (which is crazy compared to his early season form) and I'd be much more comfortable with Cunningham in the team as a seasoned player.
    Last edited by longmile; 5 September 2022, 12:43 PM.

    Comment

    • mcs
      Travelling Swannie!!
      • Jul 2007
      • 8161

      Originally posted by longmile
      Such a shame about McInerney. My GF and I joke that he lost his mojo when he cut off his beautiful long locks. However, more credibly it seems his drop off in form corelates with when he had COVID. Perhaps he is having some long COVID effects like lethargy etc because he is a shade of his former self.

      Like others here I think he is our worst player at the moment by a long shot (which is crazy compared to his early season form) and I'd be much more comfortable with Cunningham in the team as a seasoned player.
      There is a such a difficult trade-off to consider and try to weigh up.

      Do you bring in an experienced head like Cunningham, who will bring that seasoned pro element to it, reliable and pretty dependable, but not the same type of player in terms of being (when on form) able to break lines and open the game up. Or do you stick with McInerney and back him in, on the hope, despite his form not being at his highest level, that he can roll out a couple of moments of magic when needed.
      "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

      Comment

      • RogueSwan
        McVeigh for Brownlow
        • Apr 2003
        • 4602

        I imagine that the selection committee would be reluctant to mess with a winning team, consistency is a valuable commodity at this time of year.
        Cunningham is probably better as medsub at this point. Having played plenty of time down back he would slot back in better than most (I'm still picturing Ollie roll his ankle). It wouldn't be good if we had to sacrifice Mills' game to put him into defence.
        Harry can also play the wings and was also used as a forward during our "slingshot" period a few years back.
        "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

        Comment

        • i'm-uninformed2
          Reefer Madness
          • Oct 2003
          • 4653

          Originally posted by mcs
          There is a such a difficult trade-off to consider and try to weigh up.

          Do you bring in an experienced head like Cunningham, who will bring that seasoned pro element to it, reliable and pretty dependable, but not the same type of player in terms of being (when on form) able to break lines and open the game up. Or do you stick with McInerney and back him in, on the hope, despite his form not being at his highest level, that he can roll out a couple of moments of magic when needed.
          It's a fair question, but not sure Harry will take his spot - which is wing, and the immense running involved, particularly defensively. It'd require Harry to play down back, which is his best spot, and Ollie to push back up to a wing, or Blakey maybe. But Ollie's finally found his groove down there, and I'd be loathe to unsettle the defence right now.

          Don't get me wrong - I'm not blindly defending McInerney here. But I'm just thinking through the challenges of the team structure.
          'Delicious' is a fun word to say

          Comment

          • longmile
            Crumber
            • Apr 2011
            • 3365

            Originally posted by i'm-uninformed2
            It's a fair question, but not sure Harry will take his spot - which is wing, and the immense running involved, particularly defensively. It'd require Harry to play down back, which is his best spot, and Ollie to push back up to a wing, or Blakey maybe. But Ollie's finally found his groove down there, and I'd be loathe to unsettle the defence right now.

            Don't get me wrong - I'm not blindly defending McInerney here. But I'm just thinking through the challenges of the team structure.
            I understand that Cunningham is better off in a defensive role, but people forget he has a laser kick and is a good runner. Sure he migthnt be as flashy as McInerney but I think you are underselling his assets which are speed, endurance and good kick.

            Comment

            • i'm-uninformed2
              Reefer Madness
              • Oct 2003
              • 4653

              Originally posted by longmile
              I understand that Cunningham is better off in a defensive role, but people forget he has a laser kick and is a good runner. Sure he migthnt be as flashy as McInerney but I think you are underselling his assets which are speed, endurance and good kick.
              Oh yes, and I'm a big fan of Harry. He's easily the hard luck story of the team's stability and performance over the last eight weeks.

              Anyway, here's another good story on Rowbottom for those interested.

              AFL news 2022: James Rowbottom Sydney Swans leader, interview, captain chances, stats, draft, finals win over Melbourne Demons
              'Delicious' is a fun word to say

              Comment

              • stevoswan
                Veterans List
                • Sep 2014
                • 8550

                Titus's weekend review is now out.

                Footy is a passion, not some cold hearted, spread sheet dominated rational exercise.  On a Monday, you want irrational reaction. You want emotion to trump


                Some pearlers:

                "It’s September, which means it’s Gary Rohan time."

                "You can overcomplicate these review things; Sydney was simply better and more desperate, Robbie Fox proved that several times in his Gandalf moment."

                On the Lions/Tigers goal review: "People need to admire the fact that the AFL can get things wrong in both digital and analogue forms, quite the achievement.

                If the AFL had been in charge of building the ark in the Bible, not a single thing would be alive today."

                "Moments later the siren went, and so shocked was everyone at this turn of events, they played the Richmond theme song like this was a Crows pre-season camp."

                Comment

                • i'm-uninformed2
                  Reefer Madness
                  • Oct 2003
                  • 4653

                  Coaches votes are in, and May gets a 10. Parker 8, then of our guys Rowie, Mills and Lloyd 3 apiece.

                  Gary Ayres Award: Three perfect 10s, Cats star's shock result
                  'Delicious' is a fun word to say

                  Comment

                  • RogueSwan
                    McVeigh for Brownlow
                    • Apr 2003
                    • 4602

                    Originally posted by i'm-uninformed2
                    Coaches votes are in, and May gets a 10. Parker 8, then of our guys Rowie, Mills and Lloyd 3 apiece.

                    Gary Ayres Award: Three perfect 10s, Cats star's shock result
                    Seems about right.
                    "Fortunately, this is the internet, so knowing nothing is no obstacle to having an opinion!." Beerman 18-07-2017

                    Comment

                    • rojo
                      Opti-pessi-misti
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 1103

                      Serong earned 10 votes, (sigh), and Rohan, (its never too late to turn things around), a 9!

                      Comment

                      • dejavoodoo44
                        Veterans List
                        • Apr 2015
                        • 8582

                        Originally posted by i'm-uninformed2
                        Coaches votes are in, and May gets a 10. Parker 8, then of our guys Rowie, Mills and Lloyd 3 apiece.

                        Gary Ayres Award: Three perfect 10s, Cats star's shock result
                        I doubt if Buddy will need any extra motivation in a preliminary final, but if he does, May getting a 10 might be it.
                        And I'm actually quite pleased that the ginger ninja got 9 votes in the Geelong/Collingwood game.

                        Comment

                        • AB Swannie
                          Senior Player
                          • Mar 2017
                          • 1579

                          Originally posted by i'm-uninformed2
                          I saw it slightly differently. I thought he did a good job of minding Langdon and curbing his ability to get into open space and use his powerful running, and laid a few strong tackles in the last quarter. It's not the first time he's played this role well. I for one had assumed for a bit it was an injury that was causing McInerney's woes, and maybe he was at one point earlier in the season, but he's still covering the ground, at least defensively.

                          But I do agree he's completely lost his confidence offensively. Whenever he gets the ball he pauses, even in open play, looks around, and seems to freeze up; rather than go with his instincts or look to dash off when he is in a bit of space. Let's hope he can regain his mojo.
                          I see it the same as you. McInerney did his job on Langdon. His work off the ball is superb. It is when he gets the ball that there is an issue currently. Fortunately, we have seen a body of work previously which indicates that this could be a slump and not a constant. Personally, I'd prefer to keep him in the team. Cunningham has not played wing for years and it would be crazy to plug him in there now after winning 8 straight.

                          Comment

                          • jono2707
                            Goes up to 11
                            • Oct 2007
                            • 3326

                            It's a pretty good sign if we're talking about McInerney and Buddy being the two 'weak links' (very much in inverted commas) at the moment....

                            Comment

                            • giant
                              Veterans List
                              • Mar 2005
                              • 4731

                              Originally posted by rojo
                              Serong earned 10 votes, (sigh), and Rohan, (its never too late to turn things around), a 9!
                              Serong was amazing (and yes I sighed too).

                              Comment

                              • giant
                                Veterans List
                                • Mar 2005
                                • 4731

                                Originally posted by mcs
                                There is a such a difficult trade-off to consider and try to weigh up.

                                Do you bring in an experienced head like Cunningham, who will bring that seasoned pro element to it, reliable and pretty dependable, but not the same type of player in terms of being (when on form) able to break lines and open the game up. Or do you stick with McInerney and back him in, on the hope, despite his form not being at his highest level, that he can roll out a couple of moments of magic when needed.
                                The same-ish discussion could be had re McDonald and Amartey. On balance, I suspect the selectors will decide if it ain't broke don't fix it.

                                Comment

                                Working...