2025 List Management

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Roadrunner
    Senior Player
    • Jan 2018
    • 1487

    Originally posted by liz

    If you read what I actually wrote, it was that we should trade out/retire these players if we don't think we're capable of contending in the next few seasons. The 'if' was intentionally doing a lot of work there. The suggestion of trading out Heeney and Papley was intended to emphasise the non-applicability of the 'if' clause.
    Yes, I understood that “if” Liz. But seriously, barring another horror run of injuries, our team is good enough to contend. After all, we finished minor premiers last year playing some terrific football. We do have some weaknesses and hopefully they can be addressed by a couple of astute trades and draft picks. Grundy has at least another couple of years judging by his form lately. Paps had a horrid run of injuries and Heeney has had another outstanding year. Our young players can and should improve next year and our older guys like Ramps and Harry are still playing good footy. My only concern is Lloydy as I think his form has been poor. We’ve missed Logan and Joel in our forward line but hopefully next year we will see them play regularly. The player we missed the most is Paddy as we haven’t been able to adequately replace him, though Hamling has played a few really good games before his injury- but we do need an upgrade there. And of course we’ve missed Parks- his toughness and forward play.

    Bottom line: we should never trade Paps or Heens Liz- there can be no “if” ever!

    Comment

    • liz
      Veteran
      Site Admin
      • Jan 2003
      • 16807

      Originally posted by Roadrunner

      Yes, I understood that “if” Liz. But seriously, barring another horror run of injuries, our team is good enough to contend. After all, we finished minor premiers last year playing some terrific football. We do have some weaknesses and hopefully they can be addressed by a couple of astute trades and draft picks. Grundy has at least another couple of years judging by his form lately. Paps had a horrid run of injuries and Heeney has had another outstanding year. Our young players can and should improve next year and our older guys like Ramps and Harry are still playing good footy. My only concern is Lloydy as I think his form has been poor. We’ve missed Logan and Joel in our forward line but hopefully next year we will see them play regularly. The player we missed the most is Paddy as we haven’t been able to adequately replace him, though Hamling has played a few really good games before his injury- but we do need an upgrade there. And of course we’ve missed Parks- his toughness and forward play.

      Bottom line: we should never trade Paps or Heens Liz- there can be no “if” ever!
      Still not sure you get my point. I was trying to say "of course we should view ourselves as contending", using the provocative suggestion of trading out Heeney and Papley if we think we aren't.

      And because we have to think we are contending, we should be looking to bolster our "right now" squad right now, even if it costs us securing every academy 18yo who might be available this year.

      Comment

      • Roadrunner
        Senior Player
        • Jan 2018
        • 1487

        Originally posted by liz

        Still not sure you get my point. I was trying to say "of course we should view ourselves as contending", using the provocative suggestion of trading out Heeney and Papley if we think we aren't.

        And because we have to think we are contending, we should be looking to bolster our "right now" squad right now, even if it costs us securing every academy 18yo who might be available this year.
        Ok Liz-I’m happy now! I get your point. It’s only because I can never contemplate trading out those two, no matter the circumstances! I understand where you’re coming from and let’s hope our Academy picks will become our future stars.

        Comment

        • Auntie.Gerald
          Veterans List
          • Oct 2009
          • 6486

          For me another finals ready Key Defender is ........... the KEY
          "be tough, only when it gets tough"

          Comment

          • BRS328
            Warming the Bench
            • Feb 2018
            • 376

            Originally posted by UUaswan
            Priority has to be the Academy, a Key Defender and a the health of our fwds.

            Im scared of the Alir Trade or the Ladhams Trade where we get screwed.
            Can’t agree you on this. I believe a key forward is the first priority. The current defence set against Brisbane was very good last week and the primary reason we won the game. The club have very high hopes for Will Edwards who had a season ruined by injury. At 197cm and 22 years old it has to be now or never.
            I would also like to see Hamling retained for one more year as he showed very good defensive skills prior to his injury.
            The forward line was decimated this year with only one recognised player (Hayward) playing most games. This is where the depth is very limited, and I am yet to be convinced that Buller is the answer. He looked totally lost against Andrews last Saturday. Buller may be a possibility as a defender

            Comment

            Working...