trade week ideas (merged thread)

[hammo]

Originally posted by liz

It is hard for teams to aspire to play like West Coast if they don't have a quartet in the middle with anything like the talent and speed of Judd, Cousins, Cox and Kerr.

Personally I don't think Sydney will be allowed to create as many stoppages as we like to next year. West Coast showed the way to beat the Swans in the 1st half of the grand final. The poorer teams will struggle to implement that game plan consistently but the better teams - who we ultimately need to beat - now have a blueprint for how to beat us.

[punter257]

clint bizzell is available - full back material?

[AnnieH]

Originally posted by hammo
Personally I don't think Sydney will be allowed to create as many stoppages as we like to next year. West Coast showed the way to beat the Swans in the 1st half of the grand final. The poorer teams will struggle to implement that game plan consistently but the better teams - who we ultimately need to beat - now have a blueprint for how to beat us.

Here's hoping Roosey has something up his sleeve ready for it.

[Industrial Fan]

Originally posted by hammo
I
You've suggested we trade Davis so to illustrate how ridiculous that is I am suggesting we should trade Goodes while we're at it.

You sure showed me!!

Wow, I was being COMPLETELY ridiculous!!


I don't think I'm the one who needs any "cred".

Neither do I, your best mate is also in desperate need.

[AnnieH]

MMG ... Hammo ... Look at moi. Look at moi !!

Children ... stop fighting. Play noicely with the ball.
I won't take you out anymore.


God I hate school holidays!!!
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA

[Industrial Fan]

It coz nothing has happened in trade week yet!!

How can aker be confirmed with no details??

[AnnieH]

Originally posted by Marry me Goodes
It coz nothing has happened in trade week yet!!

How can aker be confirmed with no details??

Because they've said that they're not trading a player for him.
It's all got to do with $$'s.

[DeadlyAkkuret]

Originally posted by hammo
Personally I don't think Sydney will be allowed to create as many stoppages as we like to next year. West Coast showed the way to beat the Swans in the 1st half of the grand final. The poorer teams will struggle to implement that game plan consistently but the better teams - who we ultimately need to beat - now have a blueprint for how to beat us.

West Coast were lucky to beat us, so i wouldn't be changing the game plan too much, if at all.

[hammo]

Originally posted by Annie Haddad
Because they've said that they're not trading a player for him.
It's all got to do with $$'s.

[satchmopugdog]

I want something to happen and I want it to happen NOW.


Stop stuffing around. Tell the truth you damn negotiators instead of playing stupid games and just give us a damn good deal.


NOW NOW NOW.




ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.

[AnnieH]

Originally posted by hammo

On the news last night, the president (or someone) of the WBs said that there was no other player involved in the trade of W**kermanis ... so that only leaves me to believe that some sort of payment to Brisvegas will be made, i.e. pay out his current contract, and perhaps a little bit more for the effort.

I don't know what else they could possibly use in a trade deal with Acker.


Satchmo ... this is worse than those two weeks before the QF.
ARRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHHHHHH.

[hammo]

Originally posted by Annie Haddad
On the news last night, the president (or someone) of the WBs said that there was no other player involved in the trade of W**kermanis ... so that only leaves me to believe that some sort of payment to Brisvegas will be made, i.e. pay out his current contract, and perhaps a little bit more for the effort.

I am fairly sure all trades must involves a pick or a player. In this case it could be a 2nd or 3rd rounder.

[AnnieH]

Originally posted by hammo
I am fairly sure all trades must involves a pick or a player. In this case it could be a 2nd or 3rd rounder.

WBs said that no other player was involved, and they told the AFL at 10.14am yesterday (official trading started at 10.30), so I'm assuming that must be ok with the AFL.
Who bloody knows???? They may be giving up a draft pick for him ... it'd be a middle of the road pick, at best. I'm not sure what their trading "numbers" are. How did they finish on the ladder?

[giant]

Originally posted by hammo
I am fairly sure all trades must involves a pick or a player. In this case it could be a 2nd or 3rd rounder.

And you would be correct. Tho I wouldn't be surprised to see a 1st round pick involved.

[Industrial Fan]

But could they lodge the paperwork to dispatch aka, and then say:

we'll come back to you with our offer?

Maybe they have an undertaking to get another pick from another club?

Either way, it seems like a funny deal.