judd

[hammo]

Judd virtually never plays a bad game. As we saw at the start of this year, Goodes can have bad patches. Judd is more consistent.

Who cares if Goodes can play in different positions - you get more value from someone absolutely dominating a single position.

Spot on. Judd is consistently brilliant. Goodes when he gets going is among the top 3 in the competition but infrequently plays at that level.

2003 and 2006 are his only genuinly great seasons that would stand alongside all of Judd's IMO.

[goswannie14]

Apples and Oranges, they are both such different players you wouldn't/couldn't choose one over the other.

[AnnieH]

that raises an interesting point - would you rather juud or goodes????

Goodsey.

[doctor swan]

id love judd here , just what we need, a brilliant midfielder BUT he has stated he wants to move back to victoria which means sydney is out as a option. but we can dream.............judd to sydney = another premiership

[ROK Lobster]

Question is, what sort of a tagger would he make?

[Layby]

Question is, what sort of a tagger would he make?

An old looking one

[AnnieH]

An old looking one

Old ... and tired.
Don't forget injury prone.
We've seen the best of Judd.

[hammo]

Old ... and tired.
Don't forget injury prone.
We've seen the best of Judd.

Only someone who knows absolutely nothing about football would say such a stupid thing.

[ItsAllGoodes]

Thinks (hopes) Annie is baiting...and actually catching a few

[Layby]

I will hand back my membership if he is old, tired and injury prone.

Or hand back my eaten pants, i cant remember now.

[Jeffers1984]

Jude for Judd.

[giant]

Judd virtually never plays a bad game. As we saw at the start of this year, Goodes can have bad patches. Judd is more consistent.

Who cares if Goodes can play in different positions - you get more value from someone absolutely dominating a single position.

Judd has looked pretty damn ordinary in the 2nd half of the season. Goodes pls.

[Sanecow]

Judd has looked pretty damn ordinary in the 2nd half of the season. Goodes pls.

Goodes had a dud first half of the season because he couldn't be bothered, while Judd had a dud second half of the season because he was injured. Which is worse?

[giant]

Goodes had a dud first half of the season because he couldn't be bothered, while Judd had a dud second half of the season because he was injured. Which is worse?

I guess 2008 will tell.

[giant]

At least Judd has an excuse - groin injury. What's Goodes' excuse for doing nothing in the first half of the season?

your point was that Judd never plays a bad game - my point was that in fact he's played plenty. Are we sure that Goodes wasn't carrying an injury in the first half of the year?