Trade Week - Offers and Confirmation

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Jeffers1984
    Veterans List
    • Jan 2003
    • 4564

    #61
    Originally posted by Bas
    Hawks about to swoop on ROK-

    Hawks set to swoop for O'Keefe, if the cap fits - realfooty.com.au

    Maybe pick 16 plus player.

    Davo on table next.
    I'll take 16 + Thorp.
    Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.

    Comment

    • Donners
      On the Rookie List
      • Jan 2003
      • 1061

      #62
      Three-way deal for McIntosh and a pick, and I'll be happy.

      Comment

      • ScottH
        It's Goodes to cheer!!
        • Sep 2003
        • 23665

        #63
        Maxfield interview after Day one.

        Titled - What's O'Keefe worth?

        Comment

        • stellation
          scott names the planets
          • Sep 2003
          • 9718

          #64
          Originally posted by Jeffers1984
          I'll take 16 + Thorp.
          For Davo? That deal might just make it work
          I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
          We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his time

          Comment

          • Cant turn right
            Warming the Bench
            • Dec 2007
            • 231

            #65
            I seem to remember Roos did Ross a favour last year with a couple of inexpensive premeirship players. I reckon we should get our payback this year. Which Saints player should we get and what should we offer? Kosi?

            Comment

            • ugg
              Can you feel it?
              Site Admin
              • Jan 2003
              • 15969

              #66
              Rumour on BigFooty (aka Go Fib Toy)

              Hawthorn: ROK
              Melbourne: #16
              Sydney: Green
              Reserves live updates (Twitter)
              Reserves WIKI -
              Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

              Comment

              • liz
                Veteran
                Site Admin
                • Jan 2003
                • 16763

                #67
                Originally posted by ugg
                Rumour on BigFooty (aka Go Fib Toy)

                Hawthorn: ROK
                Melbourne: #16
                Sydney: Green
                Green is a pretty good player, better than some on here give him credit for. And he's not unlike ROK in terms of the role he's able to play. But he's a similar age and I think most pundits would place him a notch or two down from ROK. He's not a regular AA contender nor a SOA contender.

                Sydney would come out of that proposed deal the worst of the three IMO.

                Could still get the Hawks to throw in another player but I think two players for one may not be what the Swans are after. There is significantly list bottling at the younger end of our list and I already think there is going to be teeth-nashing on here in a few weeks time when one or two youngsters are cut who some/many will think deserve another year - and that's without predicting who those may be. Two players for O'Keefe and possibly Lovett for another will probably bring a premature end to another who deserves more time.

                Comment

                • hammo
                  Veterans List
                  • Jul 2003
                  • 5554

                  #68
                  In regards to the BF "rumour", Maxfield was quoted as saying the Swans were after a first round pick and a player so while this may not necessarily come off, I don't think we'll settle for a direct player exchange.
                  "As everyone knows our style of football is defensive and unattractive, and as such I have completely forgotten how to mark or kick over the years" - Brett Kirk

                  Comment

                  • mcs
                    Travelling Swannie!!
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 8162

                    #69
                    what a rubbish deal that would be for us. If it was me Id take no 16 + a player or say two second round draft picks (Ie Hawthorn would have to trade to get a second decent 2nd rounder). Green is a decent player but we shouldnt waste the opportunity to get a 2nd 1st round pick if at all possible.
                    "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

                    Comment

                    • Bas
                      Veterans List
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 4457

                      #70
                      I wouldn't rely on BF for anything factual.

                      We've already had pick 16 for Lovett. Now we have it for Green.

                      Even bomber supporters are saying lovett is not worth a first round pick. However, as the Swans don't seem to rate draft picks over 12, then who knows that might be gone and instead we'll have two second round picks to draft players instead.

                      I can't figure that one out.
                      In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.

                      Comment

                      • lwjoyner
                        Regular in the Side
                        • Nov 2004
                        • 950

                        #71
                        No way for Green , a second rounder at most. Just as I hope the deal on 3aw,
                        Okeefe to dons for exchange of Locvett and a second rounder. Got to be jokin. I think I said earlier stick to the guns a first rounder, lower the better and deal with dons separately on Lovett a second rounder. I also heard this moning on 1116 that Lovett is not as keen to go to Swans as people think

                        Comment

                        • ugg
                          Can you feel it?
                          Site Admin
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 15969

                          #72
                          No love for Lovett. Hawks having second thoughts about ROK. Good news all round.

                          Sportal > AFL > News
                          Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                          Reserves WIKI -
                          Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                          Comment

                          • Lohengrin
                            On the Rookie List
                            • Jul 2008
                            • 641

                            #73
                            Originally posted by ugg
                            Hawks having second thoughts about ROK.
                            Damn!

                            Comment

                            • liz
                              Veteran
                              Site Admin
                              • Jan 2003
                              • 16763

                              #74
                              Could just be a tactic to suggest they're not keen enough to entertain discussions around pick 12 (or 16, if that materialises). Or maybe they've jsut lost interest.

                              Maybe I'm deluded but I still haven't given up hope of a ROK change of heart. If he realises that the Hawks won't pay him even as much as the Swans have offered and other clubs are baulking, it could yet happen. Still think a big risk remains of him going via the PSD if no-one comes up with an acceptable trade. Carlton could possibly price him out of others' reach - certainly the Demons would struggle with their 92.5% cap restrictions next year. Would he risk the chance of one of the Perth clubs picking him up?

                              Comment

                              • DeadlyAkkuret
                                Veterans List
                                • Oct 2006
                                • 4547

                                #75
                                Glad we've passed on Lovett.

                                Comment

                                Working...