Why not Cousins?
Collapse
X
-
The SANFL doesnt want him either: SANFL clubs snub Cousins | AdelaideNow
He may end up playing against Sydney again - our seconds in the ACTAFLOccupational hazards:
I don't eat animals since discovering this ability. I used to. But one day the lamb I was eating came through to me and ever since then I haven't been able to eat meat.Comment
-
Comment
-
Hey Nico
it was a generalisation about medical leeway, not comparing Rama'
s issues to cousins's.
so get off your high horse....
considering addiction is a medical condition...
there is no point taking any experts point as you will always find an expert to contradict the other expert.
no one is suggesting well i am not that Cousins is owed anything from any of the clubs, my personal opinion is he deserves a second chance as it would be sad to see a great footballer bow out the way he has...
if u think just because of ben's actions that other aren't or wont in the future then u are niave(not to be rude to you or that your not entitled to an opinion)
but other players and will continue to..
Yes and which expert said drug addiction was a medical condition? Is smoking cigarettes a medical condition.
My last comment on Cousins....he had his second chance a long, long time ago.Comment
-
almost everything about drug-taking and drug addiction is medical to an extent (and legal, ethical, economic and social and so-on) from the reasons for use/abuse (psychological) to the physiological and biochemical basis of action, side-effect, potential addiction and withdrawal.then again, i think it would be worth trying 15-16 players on field so what would i knowComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
To me there is nothing surer in 2009.....The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.Comment
-
3rd chance. Damn I said I wasn't going to comment on him again.
On the term "medical condition"; I spoke to a person last night who has worked in mental health/drug addiction his whole career and his best way of describing such is this:
It is a paradigm in that it is self inflicted by people who know right from the start that it is likely to have harmful long term affects, and it is now, with the enormous research going into it, as best being treated with medicines that are in some cases addictive in themselves.Comment
-
BFD
I went out this afternoon to a get together at the Flagstaff Gardens.
I'd had a crap day where the kids had driven me nut with their hyperactive full of beans crap and I really needed to relax.
It has been a month since I'd had a drink so I waited for my wife to get home from work and happily asked her if she'd drive both to and from the event.
Normally we have an agreement that we share the driving - me to and her from
Anyway, I had a few drinks on the way in, got pretty happy this afternoon and came home.
I used alcohol as a relaxant of sorts.
As a general rule I'd drink about every 30 days.
In a way I guess I am reliant on alcohol which is a drug.
Happens to be a legal drug so I am well within societies boundaries.
I could go through other times in my life when I was reliant on this drug.
At times I'd be drinking 4 nights a week for a year or so.
My brother has a couple of beer every night.
Guess that makes him an alcoholic of sorts.
A bloke I used to be very close to through high school decided to get right into dope after school.
Through recent contact 15 years later on Facebook it seems he still is a bit of a doper.
We have little in common, but I don't hate what he does, even if I don't agree with it.
Cousins did drugs, and as far as I'm concerned, he deserves all the praise in the world for the efforts he has made in making his life 'better'
We'll always have the 'budgie haters' or whatever they call the West Coast players, and because of our recent history there will always be the haters who do so just because of the 96 GF loss.
I don't understand how people are so able to disregard the human factor and just rest on the whole 'opposition piece of crap' line and hate for hates sake.
To be honest the sentiment on this whole thread makes me sad.
I understand the not wanting Cousins at the Swans. I get his age and his injury record etc, and those who have presented their fair and 'football' POV are all within reason.
But then you have the condemners.
Annie springs to mind, and it may be unfair to name names, but she just seems so hateful for the sake of hating a WC player that her opinion seems a waste of time.
With so much misery in the world, it seems really really sad to slam Cousins down when he has done everything anyone could expect of him to rectify his problem. As far as I am concerned, people in the public spotlight like this should be applauded for not only setting a standard of rehabilitation for others to follow, but also for completely fulfilling their 'role as a role mode' and correcting their mistakes.
What better role model is there than one who admits his mistakes and corrects them?
These are the 'non football' reasons I'd have had him at the Swans.
The football reasons as I have said are worth the risk.
And that's all I have to say about that.
Except for that I wasn't having a go at Annie necessarily, but as those who appear to just be anti for the sake of being anti about an opposition player.The difference between insanity and genius is measured only in success.Comment
-
ANYONE who admits or is tested positive for taking drugs in sport should be banned for life.
I'm just lucky I guess that I'm able to revel in the fact that it is the little turd cousins that I'm able to drag through the mud.
If it were Goodesy I would have committed suicide a long time ago!!Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.Comment
Comment