Trading talk thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 707
    Veterans List
    • Aug 2009
    • 6204

    Originally posted by DeadlyAkkuret
    Dude, 28 is gone.
    Derrrr, sorry about that, I failed to adjust my notepad in the excitement.

    I think there will be some useful players in the PSD due to the requirement to delist/retire/trade out at least three players so surely with pick 5 we'll go for one there too.

    Comment

    • Robbo
      On the Rookie List
      • May 2007
      • 2946

      The Fev trade has collapsed.

      Comment

      • DST
        The voice of reason!
        • Jan 2003
        • 2705

        Richmond was the fourth club not us.

        Mummy was a straight swap.

        Just leaves us to off load pick 39 or 46 to the Hawks for Kennedy.

        Been a whirlwind couple of days, but if you look at it this way:

        We were going to lose our no.1 ruckman in Jolly but ended up with two replacements in Seaby and Mumford, retained our 6th pick and went from 22 to 14 with our second.

        We probably could have held on for a little while longer in all the deals to retain our original second rounder (or close to it) but in the end we probably would have not ended up with what we have got in.

        Those wanting pick 9 from Whorethorn, it was never really in play as they had committed to Burgoyne no mater what. Outside of them there was no more takers for Jolly.

        DST
        "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

        Comment

        • DeadlyAkkuret
          Veterans List
          • Oct 2006
          • 4547

          If we can get JK for pick 39 and 46, and seeing as he's still an unknown that's all he's worth, I'll be thrilled with pick 6, 14 and 38 in the draft.

          Comment

          • DST
            The voice of reason!
            • Jan 2003
            • 2705

            Originally posted by Robbo
            The Fev trade has collapsed.
            Wow, will Carlton take pick 46 from us at 1.45pm tomorrow.

            From what I am hearing, he and Judd are non reconciable so if he does not get traded it's possibly the end of him as Carlton will not take him back.

            That's one expensive table at the Brownlow, all $1.4 million of it.

            DST
            "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

            Comment

            • DST
              The voice of reason!
              • Jan 2003
              • 2705

              Originally posted by DeadlyAkkuret
              If we can get JK for pick 39 and 46, and seeing as he's still an unknown that's all he's worth, I'll be thrilled with pick 6, 14 and 38 in the draft.
              Agree, if we have upgraded Oreal and Gordon, added Seaby, Mumford and possibly Kennedy we will probably only need three picks in the draft and 6, 14 and 38 is reasonable.

              DST
              "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

              Comment

              • wearebloods
                Footy!
                • Aug 2009
                • 244

                Kennedy traded for pick 39 and Ben McGlnn for 46 & 70


                Kennedy and McGlynn to Swans - Official AFL Website of the Hawthorn Football Club
                The Swans Fan Zone on
                |

                Comment

                • ugg
                  Can you feel it?
                  Site Admin
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 15971


                  Kennedy and McGlynn to Swans - Official AFL Website of the Hawthorn Football Club


                  39 46 and 70. And considering we weren't going to use 70 it's a great trade

                  only question is what are we goingto throw back to the dogs
                  for hall?
                  Reserves live updates (Twitter)
                  Reserves WIKI -
                  Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

                  Comment

                  • desredandwhite
                    Click!
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 2498

                    Solid gold. Not a bad week's work, to be honest. I'll take that.

                    When you add them all up, I think we did ok. Not great, but not bad either.

                    177th Senior AFL Match - Round 4, 2009 - Sydney vs Carlton, SCG. This is obviously out of date. I suppose I'll update it once I could be bothered sitting down with the fixture and working it out....
                    Des' Weblog

                    Comment

                    • DeadlyAkkuret
                      Veterans List
                      • Oct 2006
                      • 4547

                      Really really happy with that

                      Comment

                      • Big Al
                        Veterans List
                        • Feb 2005
                        • 7007

                        I've gone from being pissed at the Jolly trade to being pretty happy with the weeks results.
                        ..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC

                        Here it is Again! - Huddo SEN

                        Comment

                        • Jeffers1984
                          Veterans List
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 4564

                          @@@@ING AWESOME!!

                          Well done SWANNIES!!

                          Welcome Ben and Josh!!!

                          Party Time!
                          Official Driver Of The "Who Gives A @@@@ As The Player Will Get Delisted Anyway" Bandwagon.

                          Comment

                          • 707
                            Veterans List
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 6204

                            Looking at it now I reckon we've done really well.

                            We've lost Jolly & Buchanon, both well into their use by life and the sacked Hall. Don't forget the latter two played minor roles in 2009.

                            We've gained Seaby who's useful and Mumford who is young, pretty good on what he did this year with alot of upside. So two rucks for one.

                            Pick wise we've still got three of our original four picks 6, 38 & 54. We've upgraded 22 (starting to get into an iffy part of this draft) to 14 which is a still strong part of the draft. We've added picks 39 & 46 ....... if I've got my sums right this time!

                            Well done Swans traders, just don't get bent over by the dorks tomorrow! Edit - just got the news, very very nice now - woo hoo and still got room for the FEv!

                            Comment

                            • Robbo
                              On the Rookie List
                              • May 2007
                              • 2946

                              Originally posted by ugg

                              Kennedy and McGlynn to Swans - Official AFL Website of the Hawthorn Football Club


                              39 46 and 70. And considering we weren't going to use 70 it's a great trade

                              only question is what are we goingto throw back to the dogs
                              for hall?
                              Why do we have to give something to the Dogs? We have already traded.

                              Comment

                              • DST
                                The voice of reason!
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 2705

                                Wow, been working hard today.

                                I think the deal with the dogs would have been to swap our last pick so it's probably going to be 38 with their third round.

                                But was that not the pick we got for Hall?

                                I am now just plain confused.

                                McGlynn will be a handy replacement for Buchanan.

                                DST
                                "Looking forward to a rebuilt, new, fast and exciting Swans model in 2010"

                                Comment

                                Working...