Yes, yes i beleive he was haha
Mega merged trading thread
Collapse
X
-
-
Every year there's something in trade week that completely mystifies me. Is there any sound reason why Freo would have bid for Mitchell? Or is making the Swans use up a first-round pick considered normal practice?The man who laughs has not yet heard the terrible newsComment
-
Normal practice. It doesn't matter who, someone would have bid in the first round to make sure Sydney used their first round pick for a talent that could have gone top 10.Comment
-
He should just keep on moving right on up to Sydney with Junior and watch him become a star for us.Comment
-
Whilst I don't doubt the validity of that statement, I suspect that Freo wouldn't have been unhappy to nab Mitchell with pick 16. Nor would any of the other clubs below Freo in the draft orderComment
-
No doubt, but that doesn't change the fact that realistically they had a 0% chance of getting him. Just making sure we paid a fair price for him.Comment
-
Longmire's article interview here:
Day 1 - Tom Mitchell Day
At the extent of the news out of trade week so far, Armstrong is the only person on the radar.
Longmire mentions a forward, I wonder who they have in mind, if anyone. Usually a fair bit of news comes out of Day 1 of Trade Week and then it goes quiet for a few days while Clubs wheel and deal.
So maybe the Swans might not be significant movers and shakers.
I've run out of cliches!!!!In memory of my little Staffy - Dicey, 17.06.2005 to 1.12.2011- I'll miss you mate.Comment
-
So the Armstrong deal is still some way from being completed. Adelaide are reportedly wanting some players back after they trade out Gunston, Armstrong and Maric. Could this be a good opportunity for us to unload a Moore, Bevan or even Seaby if both Maric and Tippett leave the Crows. I don't place Sumner under this category as I think he has little to no trade currency, being a 1 game homesick player.Comment
-
Comment
-
The rule this year is that if another club wants to bid for a father son player they can, and it makes the FS club make a decision - how much do we want him, what are we prepared to pay. We are not now getting something for nothing. There is a charge. In our case, our first round draft pick.
If we had decided he wasn't worth it, then Freo would have had him as they nominated a higher draft pick than we actually had. The ball was in the Swans court and a decision was made to keep him and pay up our first round draft pick. Our advantage is that he was in fact a FS, so we got first option. Makes sense to me. Still got him cheap.If you've never jumped from one couch to the other to save yourself from lava then you didn't have a childhoodComment
-
The bidding system is not to stop father son pick-ups (though that could happen one day if another club rates a pick much higher than the entitled club) but to stop absurdities like Gary Ablett - the #1 draft prospect - going to Geelong for pick 35....J. Brown the same. If Marc Murphy has said "yes" to Brisbane he would have gone for a pick in the 40s!!!!!"I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005Comment
-
Sharp, Ablett was no where near the number 1 draft prospect when he was drafted. He was a small forward with a suspect tank. Would have went there abouts in the real thing, maybe even lower if he wasn't picked up through father son.Comment
Comment