-
-
McDonald hit with two-week suspension
JAMES McDONALD can play a part in trying to plot the downfall of Greater Western Sydney's next opponent, but he will not be out in the middle carrying out the plan after accepting a two-game suspension yesterday.
Last night the Giants decided not to contest a rough conduct charge against the oldest player on their list for a hit on Sydney teenager Luke Parker in Saturday night's season-opener against the Swans.Comment
-
..And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC
Here it is Again! - Huddo SENComment
-
GREATER Western Sydney player-coach James McDonald admitted he would've reported himself for the heavy hit he delivered in the AFL opener last Saturday night.
McDonald, a member of the AFL match review panel last season, said he knew the severity of the the bump that broke Swans midfielder Luke Parker's jaw would be taken into account.Comment
-
Longmire has his say.
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. - Edmund BurkeComment
-
I think Macca's facial expression in the background of the article says it all.Does God believe in Atheists?Comment
-
I think that is a fantastic response from Longmire. There is a subtle dig at those in the media who applauded McDonald's actions (and I was very surprised by Healy's comments - I would have expected them from some other commentators but less so from him), but the response to the incident by Parker has been glossed over in all the post match discussion, and it is great to see Longmire making a point of this.Comment
-
I don't have an issue with what Healy said but there certainly should have been more focus on the toughness of Parks in playing on. Kudos to Horse though for sticking up for our players...And the Swans are the Premiers...The Ultimate Team...The Ultimate Warriors. They have overcome the highly fancied Hawks in brilliant style. Sydney the 2012 Premiers - Gerard Whately ABC
Here it is Again! - Huddo SENComment
-
Now I'll have my say.
McDonald comes out in the paper and says; "the bump was not intended to hurt, but rather to stop the Swans easy takeaways from the centre contests". " I think Sydney was starting to get on top of us a little bit. We had to lift the intensity" He knew the severity of the bump would be taken into account.
Wait a minute here. This a bloke who was on the review panel last year who would have known before he took aim at Luke that he was going to hit him off the ball, and he was going to cop it regardless of the severity or if it was head high. It is a no no to do what he did. The AFL brought in the penalty to stop players getting snipped and mugged off the ball.
To me any player who does this and doesn't have the courage to win his own ball should have the penalty doubled. Didn't this bloke play for the same team as player Bell who got one too many concussions and now has long term memory loss and perhaps early onset dementia like some gridiron players in the USA. Just for what he is quoted on the paper today the Tribunal should have it in it's powers to review the charges and double the penalty.
A mongrel act by someone who chose not to win his own footy. If you look at the footage he had every opportunity to do that.
A 252 game veteran who I noticed on a more than a few occasions steer away from a contest he should have made. Maybe he played those 252 games because he was an avearge player in a poor side. Filthy, you bet I am. If one of our guys does this sort of stuff they should cop the full force of the rules also.
The silver lining out of this is we have found someone who has the eye, anticipation, leg speed and skill to dominate centre clearances, something we haven't had for a very long time. Lets hope Tom Mitchell comes to hand quickly because he has exactly the same talents. Luke was absolutely dominating the game up to the point he got ploeaxed. Yes he stayed on but was not as effective. He had been able to continue the way he was we would have won by a lot more of which I have no doubt.Last edited by Nico; 28 March 2012, 11:58 AM.Comment
-
Longmire's response is awesome. A touch of Roosy at his best in it.Comment
-
Yeah, great response from Horse...Even better from Parker
Running past the ball, to take out a player who has eyes only for the ball, is IMO a weak statement that reads...."I can't beat you in the contest fairly, so I'll take you out while you're not looking."
Parker getting up and playing on, with a fractured jaw, continuing to put his head over the ball, and playing pretty well....that's an awesome, powerful statement.Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MTComment
-
Comment
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
- RWO Forum Rules (PLEASE READ FIRST)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your posts may be deleted, without warning or notification at moderator discretion, for breach of any of the RWO rules set out below. If you have any questions or concerns about post/thread removal, please feel free to PM a moderator or Email us at [email protected]
Do not post your queries on the main boards. Such posts WILL be removed, without further explanation.
Constant breaches of the rules will result in your access to RWO being reduced as the Moderator / Administrator group see fit. RWO uses the vBulletin Infraction System to deal with breaches of the RWO rules. All Infractions have an expiry date. Such an expiry date may be as short as 10 days or as long as 6 months. Multiple infractions, depending on the number of points a member accumulates, WILL result in temporary bans from the site and CAN result in a permanent ban. Please note that some Infractions have an expiry date of "Never" and WILL result in the RWO member being banned from the site immediately.
1) Signatures / Avatars
Keep signatures under 4 lines of standard sized fonts (if you must use large fonts, use just one line) as a courtesy to all users who read the forums.
Do not use signatures / avatars as an opportunity to make jibes at other forum members. This will be considered to be sniping (refer Rule 6 below). You may not refer to another RWO forum member, or quote anything they have written, without permission from that member. Using an anonymous tag does not make it acceptable. If quotes are not removed, we reserve the right to remove them, without notification. If in doubt as to whether something is acceptable or not, don't use it!
2) Spamming
Advertising for personal commercial purposes is NOT permitted. Placing links to sites that other users may find of interest / personal websites is acceptable within reason (ie constantly posting links will be frowned upon).
3) Deliberately avoiding the RWO swear filter
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. A swear filter is in place to mask offensive words and phrases. This swear filter contains offensive words and variant spellings of offensive words to stop you from deliberately avoiding the swear filter. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter through alternate spelling of offensive words. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter by devising systems to fool the swear filter in its recognition of offensive words.
4) Inappropriate Language / Excessive swearing
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. Moderators will let some minor cases through. Anything deemed to be of poor taste or of an offensive nature may be removed at moderator discretion. Consider all members when posting; what you think is funny, not all members will feel the same way.
5) Trolling / Baiting
Deliberately posting on threads in an attempt to stir / bait other RWO users will not be tolerated.
6) Flaming / Sniping / Abuse / Insulting other members
If you have to have a go at someone personally, take it off the boards. Everyone else doesn't need to see your hissy fits. Remember, "Play the ball, not the man". This includes spouses or partners. If you don''t like a post, don't flame, snipe, abuse or insult in response - it makes the job of moderation much harder. Report the post through the forum reporting mechanism (click on the Triangle with the exclamation mark) and let the Moderator / Administrator group deal with it.
7) Legal issuesa) The Moderator / Administrator group will keep a very close eye on threads discussing rumours or anything that could be potentially libellous. Moderators and Administrators are not interested in the chance of legal action regardless of how small - if deemed that there is ANY threat to RWO potentially, we will come down hard on it.
b) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and the potential legal implications, posting of complete articles is NOT permitted. If necessary, post a link to the article. Where appropriate, you may quote sections of the article to aid in discussion.
c) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and potential legal implications, posting of links to "live streaming (of AFL games)" and "AFL content" sites that are not AFL endorsed is NOT permitted. Posts with such links will be removed immediately and infraction points will be issued.
d) Freedom of speech does NOT = freedom to slander
8) Racial / Sexual Discrimination / Villification
It is not acceptable for members to engage in racial and/or sexual discrimination / villification. It is not acceptable for members to use terminology in describing race or gender in a derogatory manner. Discussing and disputing the views and opinions of other posters is acceptable. Personally vilifying or abusing others for having certain characteristics, or being a member of a certain group (or because you think they're a member of a certain group), is not. This rule shall apply to any post attacking race, skin colour, ethnic background, gender and sexuality.
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 9
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C
9) Prohibited
Anything deemed to be of Adult content or porn related nature will be removed immediately. Selling or offering of drugs, drug references, other than those openly discussed and identified in the press, will also be removed immediately. Breaches of this rule carry the highest infraction points and may result in permanent bans on a first offence.
10) Off-topic Posts
Some members prefer to just read Swans or footy related posts. This is, after all, a SSFC website. Ensure you post threads in the appropriate forum, or they will be moved. While threads will sometimes move away from the original topic, do not deliberately drag a thread away from its original subject.
11) Attachments
Attachments within the size limit prescribed are permitted. However, due to costs associated with uploads/downloads, if you wish to attach a number of files within a thread, or feel that the quality of the attachment is compromised by the file size restrictions, you may wish to use external hosting providers and link to the files there.
12) Moderator / Administrator Group
The Moderator / Administrator group reserve the right to delete or move threads / posts as well as remove signatures / avatars as necessary according to the rules of the RWO forum.
13) Final decisions
Any decisions made around the intepretation of the rules above are entirely at the discretion of the site administrators. Such decisions are final.
14) Vistitors from other sites
You are most welcome to join in discussions on RWO, but remember, you are a GUEST on our site. Abide by the RWO Forum Rules or we WILL ban you.
15) Guidelines regarding Visitors to RWO for RWO members.
Be nice, not all visitors are trolls.a) If they annoy you, ignore them. They want a reaction. Don't give them one.
b) If they are abusive, report them. We will consider banning them. Don't stoop to their level.Bottom line
You are a guest on RWO - You are expected to play by the rules of the house.
Last Update: ScottH, June 22nd, 2008 (Included Spouses/partners in Rule 6)
Last Update: Frog, August 16th, 2010 (Added rule 7c)
Last update: ScottH July 17th, 2011 (Added Rule 7d)
Tweet
© RedAndWhiteOnline.com 2003-
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.6
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT+10. This page was generated at 02:18 AM.
Comment