So have we officially said that we will be challenging the decision?
Goodesy - One Week
Collapse
X
-
Goodes is paying the penalty for what is perceived as having a bit of a dream run at the tribunal in the past. Of course, every case should be treated on it's merits and you shouldn't get an undeserved week just because you were close to getting a week previously.
As for the report itself, because the commentators didn't mention it straight away wouldn't necessarily indicate it wasn't laid immediately, but I guess you've conceeded that.
Let's cross our fingers, but I'm less hopeful now than I was this time yesterday. Even some of our own supporters here have advocated he should get a week and move on because it was a silly thing to do.
WTF, a week because it was silly, not because it was dangerous and vicious?????Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09Comment
-
To all those people who waited 72 years to see a South Melbourne/Sydney Swans premiership HERE IT IS!!Comment
-
-
So from your comments can I assume that every other player in the league can go low down and slide in to get the ball except for Goodes as he is a repeat offender? What exactly is he repeatedly offending?Comment
-
He copped a week in the NAB cup only 6 weeks ago for the same thing.Comment
-
This crap isn't happening at the 2nd tier or amateur leagues.
#notasillygame
#sillyleaguerules
Comment
-
I suspected it may get worse as soon as the hands on the back in a marking contest rule started to be enforced, it appeared to be a knee jerk imposed by an increasingly risk adverse group that was striving to ensure rules had very black and white measures for when they were broken. No great shame in trying to ensure people clearly know when they stand, but not when you end up with a situation where that literal "always wrong if you do this" interpretation of the rule isn't in line with the intention of the rule.I knew him as a gentle young man, I cannot say for sure the reasons for his decline
We watched him fade before our very eyes, and years before his timeComment
-
Comment
-
-
Isaw Judd do something similar on friday night and nothing is said . If Judd gets a 3rd Brownlow this year then the umps have been bought off from proceeds of the Pratt estate ;-) . Let's not forget that a few years back that Leigh Matthews said that our Adam was a protected species - well Add Judd to that damned list if that's the case.I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not so sure..................
Chickens drink - but they don't pee!
AGE IS ONLY IMPORTANT FOR TWO THINGS - WINE & CHEESE!Comment
-
I look forward to Adam telling us exactly what he was trying to do - given it is his second time up for "sliding in" i hope the message sinks in that is unacceptable the way the game is interpreted today - we just have to suck it and have a whinge if somebody else does it and does'nt get reported - can anybody think of an example of other players using a similar technique - apart from soccer players !!!Comment
-
His opponent slid in first, if he had of kept his feet Goodes would have been able to also. Instead Goods has had to slide in also to avoid cleaning up the opposition player completely with a knee to the head. A collision here was unavoidable, the one that occurred was the last severe of the options available. This should get thrown out its an absolute disgrace.Comment
-
What I don't get is that the Port player did exactly the same thing. If Judd did it too and he does slide in with his studs open on quite a few occasions, he should also be cited.Comment
-
Comment
Comment