It wasnt before?
So... for the Swans to finish top 2....
Collapse
X
-
-
Guess how many points the pies will get and add that to the hawks points against. Multiply by our percentage. Divide by 100. Subtract the hawks points for.
So if the pies get 50 then the Hawks need to get 146.
Roughly 100 points assuming we don't improve or reduce our percentage much today.
I think.Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way you'll be a mile away and he'll be shoeless.Comment
-
I did a few figures last week so this is off the top of my head now....It's tricky to be really accurate because our for and againsts vary so much...but I calculated (correctly) last week that we needed a 75 point win...and as it happened we got the chocolates by about .1% - they the lost by 20 points and lost the same amount off percentage as we gained. Last night their percentage didn't change. If our percentage doesn't change today (roughly a 90-65 point win) then we can afford a 20 point loss to Richmond UNLESS the Hawks belt Collingwood...anything more than 30 points will start boosting their percentage...so the answer to your question is that we can afford a 20 point loss to Richmond as long as we beat the Bulldogs by something like the same margin as The Hawks beat Collingwood. That figure can be slightly in our favour because big wins for them boost their percentage less than a big win for us because they have 300 more points against than we do. :-)"I'll acknowledge there are more talented teams in the competition but I won't acknowledge that there is a better team in the competition" Paul Roos March 2005Comment
-
Scores today that would see us lose top spot
140-145
120-131
100-116
80-102
60-87
40-73
Smallest win that would see us drop our percentage below that of Hawthorn's
161-160Comment
-
Comment
-
They should have won it last year if Lester had taken his time.
AFL Tables - Geelong v Brisbane Lions - Sat, 31-Aug-2013 2:10 PM - Match StatsComment

Comment