-
-
Naismith was up against it though...big Ivan played like a man posessed. Naismith's error's were purely nerves, not lack of ability. The poor bugger probably hadn't slept since Thursday no wonder he was cramping up.Twitter @cmdil
Instagram @conordillonComment
-
Can't believe the negative comments about Naismith. Considering his limited time in the reserves this year, his obvious first game nerves early in the game and coming up against the form ruckman of the moment, I think he did well. He improved as the game went on, and while he did miss his handball targets he was outdone on that score by a number of well seasoned teammates.
He would be the first debut player in a long time who was expected to be the number one, rather than the second string, ruckman.
Give the kid a break.Comment
-
I don't think it's unnecessarily harsh to say that, based on his potential and reserve form, he performed below expectations and was generally disappointing.
Given Longmire's unenthusiastic response at the press conference afterwards, I think he probably would agree.Comment
-
He performed well below expectation and deserves criticism. Doesn't mean we throw him on the scrap heap. I believe he will turn in a good ruckman.Comment
-
+1, I must agree with this. Amount of noise some people were making in the past to have him included in the team was staggering and yet it was a total anticlimax in the end. Lesson learned.Comment
-
I am so hoping that Saturday's game was an aberration! Taking into account we didn't have Buddy or a competitive ruckman, the delivery into the forward line and disposals in general were not worthy of a team that finished on top of the ladder. Most disconcerting was that it was not the young players only who were making non top-team standard deliveries. There were so many opportunities to win that game - it was like watching Melbourne!!!
I did love the games of Rampe and Rohan and as usual Parks. I thought Sam Reid too showed a little more of what a fine/valuable player he is on the way to becoming.
Comment
-
Yes, it crossed my mind as well and on Saturday I was like, no way I'm going to the game next Saturday if they play like this, but eventually I've cooled down and decided to go anyway and hope for the best.Comment
-
I wonder how many RedandWhiteOnLiners might be rethinking the savagery of their attacks on Derickz earlier in the year. Naismith is a work in progress to be sure, and will come good; Derickz did an amazing job as the team got on its roll against some first class opponents. Clooking forward to a big season from him next year.Comment
-
I think as well O'reilly, many (not necessarily on RWO) should rethink their criticism on Pyke as well. Saw many a facebook post about 'Pyke is over it - we don't need him - Naismith/dericx/Nankervis can do the job' - saturday showed how without Pyke, we don't have a rats chance of winning the flag."You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
-
Count me out.
In the first quarter I thought Naismith was not as good as Derickx. But he got a bit more adjusted to the pace and quality of AFL level after that and thought he surpassed Derickx by the time he came off in the third. He needs some work to build up his strength.Comment
-
At least with Derrickx, he quite well had worked out how to most effectively use his body to best effect - whereas Naismith doesn't have the body to do so.
If Pyke goes down, our best bet may very well be to all but concede the ruck - as Naismith or Nankervis are both going to struggle big time if they need to be called on. I still think however if Pyke goes, our hopes go with him.
Stay well, our mighty fine Canadian-Australian, ex-rugby playing ruckman
"You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
-
There's always ParkerComment
-
Naismith was good with the tap work, but had a shocker around the ground.
Will fire up in the off season.The eternal connundrum "what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object" was finally solved when David Hasselhoff punched himself in the face.Comment
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
- RWO Forum Rules (PLEASE READ FIRST)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your posts may be deleted, without warning or notification at moderator discretion, for breach of any of the RWO rules set out below. If you have any questions or concerns about post/thread removal, please feel free to PM a moderator or Email us at [email protected]
Do not post your queries on the main boards. Such posts WILL be removed, without further explanation.
Constant breaches of the rules will result in your access to RWO being reduced as the Moderator / Administrator group see fit. RWO uses the vBulletin Infraction System to deal with breaches of the RWO rules. All Infractions have an expiry date. Such an expiry date may be as short as 10 days or as long as 6 months. Multiple infractions, depending on the number of points a member accumulates, WILL result in temporary bans from the site and CAN result in a permanent ban. Please note that some Infractions have an expiry date of "Never" and WILL result in the RWO member being banned from the site immediately.
1) Signatures / Avatars
Keep signatures under 4 lines of standard sized fonts (if you must use large fonts, use just one line) as a courtesy to all users who read the forums.
Do not use signatures / avatars as an opportunity to make jibes at other forum members. This will be considered to be sniping (refer Rule 6 below). You may not refer to another RWO forum member, or quote anything they have written, without permission from that member. Using an anonymous tag does not make it acceptable. If quotes are not removed, we reserve the right to remove them, without notification. If in doubt as to whether something is acceptable or not, don't use it!
2) Spamming
Advertising for personal commercial purposes is NOT permitted. Placing links to sites that other users may find of interest / personal websites is acceptable within reason (ie constantly posting links will be frowned upon).
3) Deliberately avoiding the RWO swear filter
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. A swear filter is in place to mask offensive words and phrases. This swear filter contains offensive words and variant spellings of offensive words to stop you from deliberately avoiding the swear filter. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter through alternate spelling of offensive words. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter by devising systems to fool the swear filter in its recognition of offensive words.
4) Inappropriate Language / Excessive swearing
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. Moderators will let some minor cases through. Anything deemed to be of poor taste or of an offensive nature may be removed at moderator discretion. Consider all members when posting; what you think is funny, not all members will feel the same way.
5) Trolling / Baiting
Deliberately posting on threads in an attempt to stir / bait other RWO users will not be tolerated.
6) Flaming / Sniping / Abuse / Insulting other members
If you have to have a go at someone personally, take it off the boards. Everyone else doesn't need to see your hissy fits. Remember, "Play the ball, not the man". This includes spouses or partners. If you don''t like a post, don't flame, snipe, abuse or insult in response - it makes the job of moderation much harder. Report the post through the forum reporting mechanism (click on the Triangle with the exclamation mark) and let the Moderator / Administrator group deal with it.
7) Legal issuesa) The Moderator / Administrator group will keep a very close eye on threads discussing rumours or anything that could be potentially libellous. Moderators and Administrators are not interested in the chance of legal action regardless of how small - if deemed that there is ANY threat to RWO potentially, we will come down hard on it.
b) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and the potential legal implications, posting of complete articles is NOT permitted. If necessary, post a link to the article. Where appropriate, you may quote sections of the article to aid in discussion.
c) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and potential legal implications, posting of links to "live streaming (of AFL games)" and "AFL content" sites that are not AFL endorsed is NOT permitted. Posts with such links will be removed immediately and infraction points will be issued.
d) Freedom of speech does NOT = freedom to slander
8) Racial / Sexual Discrimination / Villification
It is not acceptable for members to engage in racial and/or sexual discrimination / villification. It is not acceptable for members to use terminology in describing race or gender in a derogatory manner. Discussing and disputing the views and opinions of other posters is acceptable. Personally vilifying or abusing others for having certain characteristics, or being a member of a certain group (or because you think they're a member of a certain group), is not. This rule shall apply to any post attacking race, skin colour, ethnic background, gender and sexuality.
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 9
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C
9) Prohibited
Anything deemed to be of Adult content or porn related nature will be removed immediately. Selling or offering of drugs, drug references, other than those openly discussed and identified in the press, will also be removed immediately. Breaches of this rule carry the highest infraction points and may result in permanent bans on a first offence.
10) Off-topic Posts
Some members prefer to just read Swans or footy related posts. This is, after all, a SSFC website. Ensure you post threads in the appropriate forum, or they will be moved. While threads will sometimes move away from the original topic, do not deliberately drag a thread away from its original subject.
11) Attachments
Attachments within the size limit prescribed are permitted. However, due to costs associated with uploads/downloads, if you wish to attach a number of files within a thread, or feel that the quality of the attachment is compromised by the file size restrictions, you may wish to use external hosting providers and link to the files there.
12) Moderator / Administrator Group
The Moderator / Administrator group reserve the right to delete or move threads / posts as well as remove signatures / avatars as necessary according to the rules of the RWO forum.
13) Final decisions
Any decisions made around the intepretation of the rules above are entirely at the discretion of the site administrators. Such decisions are final.
14) Vistitors from other sites
You are most welcome to join in discussions on RWO, but remember, you are a GUEST on our site. Abide by the RWO Forum Rules or we WILL ban you.
15) Guidelines regarding Visitors to RWO for RWO members.
Be nice, not all visitors are trolls.a) If they annoy you, ignore them. They want a reaction. Don't give them one.
b) If they are abusive, report them. We will consider banning them. Don't stoop to their level.Bottom line
You are a guest on RWO - You are expected to play by the rules of the house.
Last Update: ScottH, June 22nd, 2008 (Included Spouses/partners in Rule 6)
Last Update: Frog, August 16th, 2010 (Added rule 7c)
Last update: ScottH July 17th, 2011 (Added Rule 7d)
Tweet
© RedAndWhiteOnline.com 2003-
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.6
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT+10. This page was generated at 02:16 AM.
Comment