List changes and trade bait

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ernie koala
    Senior Player
    • May 2007
    • 3251

    Originally posted by Bloodthirsty
    Does anyone know of any players that the Swans are targeting? No mention of Swans in the incoming sense, as opposed to outgoing, anywhere I look. Any key defenders ready to go?
    No way...That would be cheating!
    Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

    Comment

    • Ludwig
      Veterans List
      • Apr 2007
      • 9359

      I am trying to understand the thinking concerning Membrey because so many of us (myself included) rated him quite highly, especially given his goal kicking prowess. His NEAFL performances would have put him ahead of Towers, but as it turned out it was Towers that got most of the chances. One possibility is that Membrey's departure was known for a long time and perhaps the one game he got was just to show him off for trade purposes. There was a lot of hype about Veszpremi when he showed so much promise in his first year, but eventually faded out, first with us and then with the Bulldogs. Maybe Membrey is in the same mould. There are obviously some things we just don't know about this situation.

      We were lucky to get Tom Mitchell as a FS selection, otherwise the 2011 and 2012 National Drafts are not looking that good. I suppose we decided to hang on to Marsh for another season, although I think there is a lot of work to do on his disposal. Hopefully Towers will continue his development and make the grade.

      Fortunately recent rookie drafts have been strong. Perhaps it's a positive sign for Dan Robinson that his name was not included with the initial departures.

      I hope the Swans management team have a better idea about where we are going than I do.

      Comment

      • GordonS
        On the Rookie List
        • May 2013
        • 129

        jack hiscox 16.1 beep test. isn't he an academy boy?

        bulldogs also interested in reid.

        Comment

        • Ampersand
          On the Rookie List
          • Apr 2014
          • 694

          Dean Towers got the nod ahead of a Membrey because Membrey is a forward and our forward line was packed with four talls. He is not versatile in terms of playing alternative positions and there were concerns about his endurance and defensive aspects of his game.

          I highly doubt that he was played to add to his trade value but rather to test if he could offer more than just his goal kicking.

          Comment

          • Dosser
            Just wild about Harry
            • Mar 2011
            • 1833

            Originally posted by Ludwig
            I am trying to understand the thinking concerning Membrey because so many of us (myself included) rated him quite highly, especially given his goal kicking prowess. His NEAFL performances would have put him ahead of Towers, but as it turned out it was Towers that got most of the chances. One possibility is that Membrey's departure was known for a long time and perhaps the one game he got was just to show him off for trade purposes. There was a lot of hype about Veszpremi when he showed so much promise in his first year, but eventually faded out, first with us and then with the Bulldogs. Maybe Membrey is in the same mould. There are obviously some things we just don't know about this situation.

            We were lucky to get Tom Mitchell as a FS selection, otherwise the 2011 and 2012 National Drafts are not looking that good. I suppose we decided to hang on to Marsh for another season, although I think there is a lot of work to do on his disposal. Hopefully Towers will continue his development and make the grade.

            Fortunately recent rookie drafts have been strong. Perhaps it's a positive sign for Dan Robinson that his name was not included with the initial departures.

            I hope the Swans management team have a better idea about where we are going than I do.
            I remember hearing some time ago that it was his defensive game that was lacking and that was what they were trying to work on in the magoos.

            Comment

            • southsideswan
              Warming the Bench
              • Oct 2012
              • 237

              Originally posted by GordonS
              jack hiscox 16.1 beep test. isn't he an academy boy?

              bulldogs also interested in reid.
              wow 16.1 beep test is elite elite

              Comment

              • Melbourne_Blood
                Senior Player
                • May 2010
                • 3312

                He's quick too isn't he ?

                Comment

                • GordonS
                  On the Rookie List
                  • May 2013
                  • 129

                  Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
                  He's quick too isn't he ?
                  24.36 in repeat sprints. that's all i could find on afl.com

                  Comment

                  • liz
                    Veteran
                    Site Admin
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 16742

                    Originally posted by southsideswan
                    wow 16.1 beep test is elite elite
                    Originally posted by Melbourne_Blood
                    He's quick too isn't he ?
                    Yep. He scored in the top 10 on the repeat sprints too - showing a combination of speed and endurance. He is a year over age (ie he's 19) and I believe he was a high level performer in junior athletics before deciding to concentrate on football. If he makes it through the ND I can't see why the Swans wouldn't rookie him. They might not even take the risk of him falling that far and nominate him for the ND.

                    Comment

                    • Jeynez
                      Warming the Bench
                      • May 2013
                      • 223

                      I'm interested to see how our List Managers approach this off season more than any other. I still think our current squad can win the flag next year without too many changes (mostly positional). But with Port, Cats and Hawks all set to land big recruits we may be forced to. Will be interesting to see how it pans out!

                      Comment

                      • Go Swannies
                        Veterans List
                        • Sep 2003
                        • 5697

                        So the Dogs are interested in Reid. Are we interested in their offer?

                        Comment

                        • mcs
                          Travelling Swannie!!
                          • Jul 2007
                          • 8149

                          Originally posted by Jeynez
                          I'm interested to see how our List Managers approach this off season more than any other. I still think our current squad can win the flag next year without too many changes (mostly positional). But with Port, Cats and Hawks all set to land big recruits we may be forced to. Will be interesting to see how it pans out!
                          I very much doubt we will trade for anyone, unless we take a good deal from someone else for someone like Reid, or decide to trade the Malceski compo pick. We clearly have a need for KPD players, but I wonder if it'll be a focus of our draft players, than actively seeking to trade for someone to fill that breach.

                          - - - Updated - - -

                          Originally posted by Go Swannies
                          So the Dogs are interested in Reid. Are we interested in their offer?
                          I think if they offered 25+26 we would have to be tempted, but I still don't think they'll want to lose Reid.

                          It would however potentially give us 4 draft picks at end of the 1st/start 2nd rd (assuming Mal goes and we get end of Rd 1 Pick). That would give us flexibility to get a nice influx of young guys, or to potentially seek an agressive trade for someone else.
                          "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

                          Comment

                          • 0918330512
                            Senior Player
                            • Sep 2011
                            • 1654

                            Originally posted by GordonS

                            bulldogs also interested in reid.
                            "My understanding is Sam's pretty set in Sydney (but) he clearly provides something that would interest us.
                            - Bulldogs CEO Simon Garlick

                            Headline grabbing rubbish - silly season indeed

                            Comment

                            • Melbournehammer
                              Senior Player
                              • May 2007
                              • 1815

                              I know its bigfooty but the dogs board has been talking about Reid as going there for several weeks

                              Comment

                              • ernie koala
                                Senior Player
                                • May 2007
                                • 3251

                                Originally posted by Go Swannies
                                So the Dogs are interested in Reid. Are we interested in their offer?
                                The way I understood Garlick, he was musing.."would pick 25 or 26 get it done?"...

                                If that's so, he's dreaming.

                                25 plus a player (not sure who we would want, that they don't)


                                More likely he stays and becomes an excellent KPD!!
                                Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

                                Comment

                                Working...