AFL slaps trade ban on Swans

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stevoswan
    Veterans List
    • Sep 2014
    • 8559

    Originally posted by JPK12
    .


    I dont laugh at other clubs unless they do something reckless and stupid, like the bombers. Maybe i dont have that bastardy that most vfl fans have when it comes to watching this code. While i will dabble in banter i wont take it to the next level like most victorian based fans do.
    I did on Big Footy and I got banned.....they can dish it out but can't take it!

    Comment

    • annew
      Senior Player
      • Mar 2006
      • 2164

      Originally posted by Mel_C
      I read in the Herald Sun that the Essendon tribunal hearing might start December 15. Isn't that the same day we are fronting the commission? A ploy perhaps by the AFL to bury the outcome and hide their incompetence. Unbelievable!!
      Or a ploy to dismiss the swans completely and all the press will be about Essendon.

      Comment

      • AnnieH
        RWOs Black Sheep
        • Aug 2006
        • 11332

        ... not if we turn up with QCs in tow.
        Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
        Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

        Comment

        • annew
          Senior Player
          • Mar 2006
          • 2164

          Originally posted by AnnieH
          ... not if we turn up with QCs in tow.
          Hope so and hope we win as it was an unfair, unjust punishment for having done nothing wrong other than being too successful for the AFL's liking.

          Comment

          • annew
            Senior Player
            • Mar 2006
            • 2164

            So the AFL are going yo soften the decision, wonder what that means.
            AFL may 'soften' trade ban - sydneyswans.com.au

            Comment

            • JPK12
              Suspended by the MRP
              • Oct 2014
              • 246

              "I'll take responsibility. I think it was poorly communicated," McLachlan told AFL.com.au's NAB Draft Countdown show on Thursday.
              Ya thunk Captain Obvious.

              Didnt think our esteem new AFL CEO needed training in media relations.

              Comment

              • annew
                Senior Player
                • Mar 2006
                • 2164

                What a debacle. Funny that swans give ANZ the flick then he comes out and says he will soften the ban.

                Comment

                • Ludwig
                  Veterans List
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 9359

                  I think this means that the trade ban has been lifted for all intents and purposes. There may be some language like 'not using Cola money for traded in players', but I interpret this public statement as a back down by the AFL.

                  Comment

                  • YvonneH
                    Senior Player
                    • Sep 2011
                    • 1141

                    In that interview he mentioned Dayne Beams. Was it ever a possibility that he wanted to come to Sydney? I thought he always wanted to go to Brisbane or Gold Coast to be near his family. I thought Joel Patfull was in the mix. Funnily enough he finished up at GWS. Surprise, Surprise.

                    I didn't think his explanation was very clear but maybe that was only me.

                    Comment

                    • ScottH
                      It's Goodes to cheer!!
                      • Sep 2003
                      • 23665

                      Originally posted by annew
                      So the AFL are going yo soften the decision, wonder what that means.
                      AFL may 'soften' trade ban - sydneyswans.com.au
                      It will probably be:

                      We can recruit any players that were born within 5kms of the SCG.

                      Originally posted by JPK12
                      Ya thunk Captain Obvious.

                      Didnt think our esteem new AFL CEO needed training in media relations.
                      It was partly the swans fault if you don't take it out of context.

                      "And that was a bit in response to the Swans not wanting to communicate it (the ban) because they wanted to use maximum leverage going into that trade period.

                      "I think in retrospect we should've communicated that properly."

                      Comment

                      • southsideswan
                        Warming the Bench
                        • Oct 2012
                        • 237

                        This is all a mystery so we try and guess. My guess is that once the Swans knew that they had a trade ban placed on them they figured they could get through this year ok and delayed action. I think that action now in front of the Commission or other bodies (court) will give Swans retrospective benefits for next year beyond normal concessions. Just my take. Wait and see.

                        Comment

                        • ernie koala
                          Senior Player
                          • May 2007
                          • 3251

                          Originally posted by YvonneH
                          In that interview he mentioned Dayne Beams. Was it ever a possibility that he wanted to come to Sydney? I thought he always wanted to go to Brisbane or Gold Coast to be near his family. I thought Joel Patfull was in the mix. Funnily enough he finished up at GWS. Surprise, Surprise.

                          I didn't think his explanation was very clear but maybe that was only me.
                          You're right, it wasn't a clear explanation, just half baked dribble to avoid further questioning.

                          He only mentioned Beams as a 'what could of happened scenario', to make their outrageously unjustified sanction look reasonable.
                          Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

                          Comment

                          • Meg
                            Go Swannies!
                            Site Admin
                            • Aug 2011
                            • 4828

                            The only clear thing from McLachlan's "explanation" is that when the AFL said the COLA was to be phased out over two years, they wanted the % to reduce progressively from 9.8% in each of the next two years before it was completely abolished in 2017.

                            But that is a very inflexible way to define "phase out". As we have previously discussed on RWO the appropriate way to phase out would have been to continue to pay full COLA to those players for whom there was a contractual obligation in the two years while applying the new accommodation assistance test to all players coming into new or renewed contracts. By 2017 there would have been very few players left with a contractual obligation for the 9.8% COLA payment (e.g. Franklin) and I believe the Swans had accepted they would have to absorb those remaining payments within the salary cap.

                            The rest of what McLachlan said was just more gobbledygook and yet another attempt to blame the Swans for wanting too much.

                            Comment

                            • AnnieH
                              RWOs Black Sheep
                              • Aug 2006
                              • 11332

                              Don't cancel the QCs just yet.
                              Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
                              Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.

                              Comment

                              • Nico
                                Veterans List
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 11339

                                Originally posted by annew
                                So the AFL are going yo soften the decision, wonder what that means.
                                AFL may 'soften' trade ban - sydneyswans.com.au
                                The man is a deadest puppet leader. Surely there had to be a better person available than this head up the clacker goose.
                                http://www.nostalgiamusic.co.uk/secu...res/srh806.jpg

                                Comment

                                Working...