AFL slaps trade ban on Swans
Collapse
X
-
Or a ploy to dismiss the swans completely and all the press will be about Essendon.Comment
-
... not if we turn up with QCs in tow.Wild speculation, unsubstantiated rumours, silly jokes and opposition delight in another's failures is what makes an internet forum fun.
Blessed are the cracked for they are the ones who let in the light.Comment
-
So the AFL are going yo soften the decision, wonder what that means.
AFL may 'soften' trade ban - sydneyswans.com.auComment
-
In that interview he mentioned Dayne Beams. Was it ever a possibility that he wanted to come to Sydney? I thought he always wanted to go to Brisbane or Gold Coast to be near his family. I thought Joel Patfull was in the mix. Funnily enough he finished up at GWS. Surprise, Surprise.
I didn't think his explanation was very clear but maybe that was only me.Comment
-
So the AFL are going yo soften the decision, wonder what that means.
AFL may 'soften' trade ban - sydneyswans.com.au
We can recruit any players that were born within 5kms of the SCG.
"And that was a bit in response to the Swans not wanting to communicate it (the ban) because they wanted to use maximum leverage going into that trade period.
"I think in retrospect we should've communicated that properly."Comment
-
This is all a mystery so we try and guess. My guess is that once the Swans knew that they had a trade ban placed on them they figured they could get through this year ok and delayed action. I think that action now in front of the Commission or other bodies (court) will give Swans retrospective benefits for next year beyond normal concessions. Just my take. Wait and see.Comment
-
In that interview he mentioned Dayne Beams. Was it ever a possibility that he wanted to come to Sydney? I thought he always wanted to go to Brisbane or Gold Coast to be near his family. I thought Joel Patfull was in the mix. Funnily enough he finished up at GWS. Surprise, Surprise.
I didn't think his explanation was very clear but maybe that was only me.
He only mentioned Beams as a 'what could of happened scenario', to make their outrageously unjustified sanction look reasonable.Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MTComment
-
The only clear thing from McLachlan's "explanation" is that when the AFL said the COLA was to be phased out over two years, they wanted the % to reduce progressively from 9.8% in each of the next two years before it was completely abolished in 2017.
But that is a very inflexible way to define "phase out". As we have previously discussed on RWO the appropriate way to phase out would have been to continue to pay full COLA to those players for whom there was a contractual obligation in the two years while applying the new accommodation assistance test to all players coming into new or renewed contracts. By 2017 there would have been very few players left with a contractual obligation for the 9.8% COLA payment (e.g. Franklin) and I believe the Swans had accepted they would have to absorb those remaining payments within the salary cap.
The rest of what McLachlan said was just more gobbledygook and yet another attempt to blame the Swans for wanting too much.Comment
-
So the AFL are going yo soften the decision, wonder what that means.
AFL may 'soften' trade ban - sydneyswans.com.auComment
Comment