If people want to discuss Donald Trump, can they please go and do so on the appropriate forum ("Open Chat"). The Swans Chat Forum is for talking about the Swans.
2017 trading, drafting, list management
Collapse
X
-
Where in the draft is this Donald Trump touted to go, will we have an appropriate pick to grab him?
14, 33, 51, should be possibilities at all three selections. I notice Crows said they'll only rookie list Jackson Edwards, will be selected in the ND for certain you'd reckon, kid has real ability.Comment
-
Is it time yet ?
Let?s make our mods job a little easier ladies and gents.........I?m sure they have better things to do then monitor, move and or delete
Time to stay on topic me thinks !!"be tough, only when it gets tough"
Comment
-
I still can't find out which academy players the swans nominated for the draft! I am hoping they might give one of them a rookie spot. It would be a pity if no academy kid got rookied and it would be concerning. I guess the best chances would be one of Brown, Bell, Wicks, or Hardman.Comment
-
Comment
-
I still can't find out which academy players the swans nominated for the draft! I am hoping they might give one of them a rookie spot. It would be a pity if no academy kid got rookied and it would be concerning. I guess the best chances would be one of Brown, Bell, Wicks, or Hardman.Comment
-
Here are Chris Doerre aka Knightmare's views about our list needs and who we should draft:
Sydney
List needs
1. Outside hurt factor
2. Defender who can generate drive from the backline
3. Young key forward
Draft picks: 14, 33, 51, 88, 106
Who should they draft? For outside hurt factor, Lochie O'Brien is an ideal fit at No. 14 as an athletic outside runner and arguably this year's most damaging kick. With pick 33, Ryley Stoddart as a backman can generate drive from defence with his pace and clean kicking. As an athletic key forward, Ben Miller at pick 51 possesses scope to develop.
I think what he says makes sense. And obviously he knows vastly more about the draft prospects than I do (virtually nothing).
Here are a couple of profiles on Ben Miller:
AFL Draft Profile: Ben Miller - Footy Prophet
If he's still available at pick 51 seems like a very good option. I wonder why he hasn't been used more as KPF/KPD which is how he might be more useful for us given we are at least adequately stocked with ruckman. Might he have less upside than other draft prospects given that he seems to have developed ahead of his age cohort? I wonder if Dean Cox will know something about him and be able to give Kinnear a bit of extra information.
At pick 14 Lochie O'Brien looks OK but it really depends on whether someone better slips through. There seems to be a fair amount of consensus about the first dozen picks (albeit not perfect and not in order)* and, unfortunately, it seems we're not so likely to get one of those A-graders. I'm not so fussed about Jack Higgins (I'm happy with Papps!) but Aiden Bonar could be an option if he's available. One that Knightmare has slipping is Charlie Constable who is rated a pick 5-17 prospect by 7 judges on Footy Prophet's Big Draft Board - should we look at him? Knightmare describes him as a rebounding defender - and that's something we could use if Aliir doesn't fill that role. However, he isn't that quick and not noted especially for his kicking ability and they are things we need more and which O'Brien has. I don't know much about Ryley Stoddart at 33 but I'd be interested in Clavarino if he were available then.
* e.g. 2017 Big Draft Board - Footy ProphetAll opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)Comment
-
At pick 14 Lochie O'Brien looks OK but it really depends on whether someone better slips through. There seems to be a fair amount of consensus about the first dozen picks (albeit not perfect and not in order)* and, unfortunately, it seems we're not so likely to get one of those A-graders. I'm not so fussed about Jack Higgins (I'm happy with Papps!) but Aiden Bonar could be an option if he's available. One that Knightmare has slipping is Charlie Constable who is rated a pick 5-17 prospect by 7 judges on Footy Prophet's Big Draft Board - should we look at him? Knightmare describes him as a rebounding defender - and that's something we could use if Aliir doesn't fill that role. However, he isn't that quick and not noted especially for his kicking ability and they are things we need more and which O'Brien has. I don't know much about Ryley Stoddart at 33 but I'd be interested in Clavarino if he were available then.Comment
-
I find it hard to believe that we gave away pick 70 in the Murray deal if we are going to take four picks. Only logical answer to AJ delisting is that we will take a DFA or upgrade a rookie. Can not see any DFA that would replace a player in our best 22 or any need to upgrade a rookie as Cat A rookies can be selected. Only conclusion is that O'Riordan is going from cat B to primary list. Alternative answer is Fox is being upgraded. Do not see the need for either as O'Riordan could be upgraded to Cat A and be available for selection and Fox was already available for selection. Both had injury affected year and in my view neither are yet ready for primary list.Comment
-
I've done a bit of research and viewing of highlights lately and my oder of preference would be Bonar, O'Brien, Balta. I think at least one and possibly all three will be available at our pick.Comment
-
Don't forget last year we went for quick outside players in Florent and Hayward who will transition to a wing in time.
So the conventional wisdom that you take best player available with your first pick may still apply, so long as it's not a ruckman!Comment
-
Some decent KPFs taken late out of current players. I'm sure others can supply other examples from times gone by:
Ben Brown pick 47, 2013
Josh Jenkins pick 12, 2010 rookie draft
Justin Westhoff, pick 71 2006
Taylor Walker, pick 75 2007 (but some shenanigans here as he was a zone selection I think)
Maybe he can be turned into a KPD as much as a KPF. He's bigger than Melican or Maibaum and also quicker and more agile.All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)Comment
-
No.1 KPF
No.2 Daylight
No.3 Mids
He had a list of all the significant KPF over about the last 12 or so years and all of them were high draft picks except for the ones drafted by Shenanigans like F/S, Zone selections, GC & GWS start up concessions etc. There were almost none outside the first round.
KPD however seemed to be picked up anywhere from mid draft to rookies. If you go through the best KPD, it's amazing how many were late draftees as opposed to the absolute dearth of KPF mid to late.
So the rock solid evidence is only draft KPF if you have a high draft pick, KPD & ruckman can be had cheap to very cheap, probably why clubs take best available early and why KPF command so much salary.Comment
Comment