Match Day Thread Rnd 15 V Melbourne. MCG 19.50 pm.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Industrial Fan
    Goodesgoodesgoodesgoodes!
    • Aug 2006
    • 3318

    Originally posted by O'Reilly Boy
    + 1 His best game since the prelim against the Shinboners in 2014 (which he played from half back rather than up the ground). His pressure game was terrific with consistent second and third efforts. If he had kicked straight?and he usually does?he would have been in top 5 on ground. The forward set up looked very good: Buddy staying down when Reid jumped, rather than spoiling each other. O Flo not there, so Hayward in for him next week if fit. I also though the one ruckman strategy paid off; against the Dons there were too many passages when Naismith and Sinclair were both on the ground lumbering around the midfield. I think that we sometimes forget that Naismith has only played 22 games! We also need to note Kizza's great game last night. Brilliant tackling and some neat kicks. Really impressive game across the park (except for kicking), and it feels like there is some good depth in the list now, particularly in the back half: Aliir, Marsh, the forgotten Laidler and Talia and, dare I say, AJ, across the back. I wonder how/whether Tippett will be able to break into the team at all: the team seems better balanced without the extra big. And I suspect that the Foote experiment might be over.
    not correct. Rohan kicked 4 in a low scoring game against the Hawks last year at the scg. He was the only one who seemed able to mark anything that night.

    The signs were there for him last night just lacked the composure to finish his good work.
    He ate more cheese, than time allowed

    Comment

    • Industrial Fan
      Goodesgoodesgoodesgoodes!
      • Aug 2006
      • 3318

      Originally posted by S.S. Bleeder
      Agreed. We need someone in the team with a bit of $&)/ in them. That was a poor decision from the umpire.

      Bugg coward punched a Swan in an incident which had it happened on the street would have resulted in charges of Intentionally Causing Injury. What did the umpire expect Papley to do?
      Papley was the one to describe it as a dog act after the game too.

      Not sure how the umpires should have handled it. We lost a player, then a goal and 80m because of the retaliation.

      Bugg was anonymous for the rest of the game.
      He ate more cheese, than time allowed

      Comment

      • 707
        Veterans List
        • Aug 2009
        • 6204

        Smith limping badly as he hobbled to the team bus this morning. Mills still looked dazed so that's two we could be missing next week and Jones sure to come under MRP scrutiny but he will have a defence in that he could only see out of one eye and therefore had no perception of depth when he clipped the Dees player and Jones was just running straight at the ball.

        So at worse we might be down Mills, Smith & Jones. Some openings there for ressie players - like Dawson!

        Comment

        • Danzar
          I'm doing ok right now, thanks
          • Jun 2006
          • 2027

          Anyone see this on Twitter? Posted it to the FB page. Classic.

          Captain, I am detecting large quantities of win in this sector

          Comment

          • stevoswan
            Veterans List
            • Sep 2014
            • 8573

            Originally posted by S.S. Bleeder
            Agreed. We need someone in the team with a bit of $&)/ in them. That was a poor decision from the umpire.

            Bugg coward punched a Swan in an incident which had it happened on the street would have resulted in charges of Intentionally Causing Injury. What did the umpire expect Papley to do?
            Commentators on Seven agreed with you. They all thought it was very poor umpiring to overturn a free from a reportable offense that would have given us a 50m penalty and a shot for goal.....potential 12 point turn around. Where's the justice and common sense. The umpires have NO common sense or 'footy sense' for that matter...

            Comment

            • ugg
              Can you feel it?
              Site Admin
              • Jan 2003
              • 15976

              If Papley had hit Bugg high I would have no problem with the reversal even though it would cost us a certain goal. What really riled me up was that it wasn't high so what was the free for?
              Reserves live updates (Twitter)
              Reserves WIKI -
              Top Goalkickers| Best Votegetters

              Comment

              • Matty10
                Senior Player
                • Jun 2007
                • 1331

                Originally posted by Danzar
                Anyone see this on Twitter? Posted it to the FB page. Classic.

                https://www.facebook.com/RWOau/videos/1371577432879883/
                That is lip-reading glory.


                Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                Comment

                • Club 80
                  Suspended by the MRP
                  • Apr 2017
                  • 149

                  Everyone at Melbourne has said that Bugg's actions "are not what we stand for".

                  If Melbourne really meant that, they would have voluntarily removed Bugg from the game at Quarter time and played one less on the bench. That would have equaled things up with the Swans.

                  Comment

                  • cherub
                    Warming the Bench
                    • May 2010
                    • 239

                    I thought Georgie Hewitt had reached another level last night. He seemed to have so much time or made good decisions quickly. He seems to have reached that level of confidence where he will back himself. I suspect he remains underrated by opposition teams.

                    Comment

                    • S.S. Bleeder
                      Senior Player
                      • Sep 2014
                      • 2165

                      Originally posted by ugg
                      If Papley had hit Bugg high I would have no problem with the reversal even though it would cost us a certain goal. What really riled me up was that it wasn't high so what was the free for?
                      And that worm, Bugg, milked it for all he could.

                      I love Papley. He calls a spade a spade: Bugg hit on Mills a 'dog act', says Swan - AFL.com.au

                      - - - Updated - - -

                      Originally posted by Matty10
                      That is lip-reading glory.


                      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                      LOL. It looks like fn w$nker. Is that what you got? I don't think they were talking about Bugg; they were in the rooms. Maybe it was BT?

                      Comment

                      • stevoswan
                        Veterans List
                        • Sep 2014
                        • 8573

                        Originally posted by cherub
                        I thought Georgie Hewitt had reached another level last night. He seemed to have so much time or made good decisions quickly. He seems to have reached that level of confidence where he will back himself. I suspect he remains underrated by opposition teams.
                        29 possessions....great game. He seems to be feeling much more comfortable about his position in the game this season. Great signs.

                        Comment

                        • Meg
                          Go Swannies!
                          Site Admin
                          • Aug 2011
                          • 4828

                          I keep reading that Bugg said he was 'embarrassed' and that's supposed to show he's remorseful. 'Embarrassed' doesn't cut it for me. He should be ashamed.

                          Comment

                          • Matty10
                            Senior Player
                            • Jun 2007
                            • 1331

                            Originally posted by S.S. Bleeder
                            LOL. It looks like fn w$nker. Is that what you got? I don't think they were talking about Bugg; they were in the rooms. Maybe it was BT?
                            My initial reading was '@@@@ing weak @@@@' (but I was watching it with the idea that they were looking at a screen showing the incident (I suppose I was projecting, to some extent). You may be right.


                            Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                            Comment

                            • Thunder Shaker
                              Aut vincere aut mori
                              • Apr 2004
                              • 4226

                              Originally posted by Meg
                              I keep reading that Bugg said he was 'embarrassed' and that's supposed to show he's remorseful. 'Embarrassed' doesn't cut it for me. He should be ashamed.
                              If he wants "embarrassed", he should serve part of his suspension in stocks in Martin Place without his dacks.
                              "Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi final

                              Comment

                              • 707
                                Veterans List
                                • Aug 2009
                                • 6204

                                Originally posted by Meg
                                I keep reading that Bugg said he was 'embarrassed' and that's supposed to show he's remorseful. 'Embarrassed' doesn't cut it for me. He should be ashamed.
                                It's all about decreasing the penalty at the Tribunal. He will get 5-6 and in all honesty he's only an ordinary footballer and wouldn't be in Melbourne's best 25 so be interesting to see if he gets back into seniors. Melbourne wouldn't have been happy with that after Hogan, Lewis and Vince have all been done for striking this season as well.

                                Comment

                                Working...