#AFL Round 8 Swans vs Dons Fri 10-May at SCG #AFLSwansDons @sydneyswans

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dejavoodoo44
    Veterans List
    • Apr 2015
    • 8494

    Originally posted by neilfws
    Apparently the SMH have asked, but Rampe was "unavailable for comment". I think I'd ensure that I was too

    Sydney's Rampe awaits his fate for goal post climb against Bombers
    Well, that's one of about a hundred. And personally, I'd still like to hear from Dane. Even if his response is something like, "@@@@, I dunno, I was doing all sorts of weird @@@@ that night".

    Comment

    • Meg
      Go Swannies!
      Site Admin
      • Aug 2011
      • 4828

      I think for Rampe - just like a certain Minister of the Crown some years ago - it seemed like a good idea at the time.

      Comment

      • Matty10
        Senior Player
        • Jun 2007
        • 1331

        Originally posted by KSAS
        As predicted, Rampe's goal post incident is dominating the media and going up a notch this morning...
        I watched the Fox broadcast and turned the TV off after we had won, where there was no mention of it during the game time feed from Channel 7. I didn't even know that it was an issue until Saturday afternoon.

        Winners are grinners and losers can please themselves, as the saying goes, so I don't even think it warrants much discussion. Robbo's hyperbole aside, he clearly disagrees. That's fine (note the saying above).

        But I would make the following points:

        Did Rampe's action impede an opposition player and did it impact the play? - If not, then who cares? Most football fans (individual club bias aside) don't want to see umpires paying free kicks in those situations.

        Even noting the point above, the AFL could still fine or report Rampe for his actions, that is their prerogative.

        The rule as it currently stands is essentially inadequate anyway (considering it does not mentioning the climbing of the post). Was it even Rampe's intention to deliberately shake the post while climbing it? I am not sure that point can be satisfied either.

        Comment

        • Meg
          Go Swannies!
          Site Admin
          • Aug 2011
          • 4828

          Originally posted by Meg
          I think for Rampe - just like a certain Minister of the Crown some years ago - it seemed like a good idea at the time.
          In fact ‘Biggles’ Rampe seems an apt nickname for Dane.

          Comment

          • stevoswan
            Veterans List
            • Sep 2014
            • 8543

            Originally posted by Meg
            In fact ‘Biggles’ Rampe seems an apt nickname for Dane.
            After giving the non decision against Dane's goal post climbing the 'all clear', the AFL now seek a 'please explain' from Rampe. The 'you talk like a little girl' barb is also part of the follow up.

            Did Alistair or Eddie or some other Victorian sook give Gil a call?

            Please explain, Dane: AFL seeks answers over Rampe's antics - AFL.com.au

            Comment

            • barry
              Veterans List
              • Jan 2003
              • 8499

              Originally posted by stevoswan
              After giving the non decision against Dane's goal post climbing the 'all clear', the AFL now seek a 'please explain' from Rampe. The 'you talk like a little girl' barb is also part of the follow up.

              Did Alistair or Eddie or some other Victorian sook give Gil a call?

              Please explain, Dane: AFL seeks answers over Rampe's antics - AFL.com.au
              The AFL leadership is tied up in knots trying to be popular to everyone. (Umps, Vic media, etc).

              Comment

              • neilfws
                Senior Player
                • Aug 2009
                • 1818

                The Rampe incident is getting quite funny now, just because it's become one of the topics that the footy world loves to discuss ad nauseum. Or whatever the Latin is for "until next week".

                I have finally read rule 17.11.1 and it refers to "a Player or Official who intentionally shakes a goal or behind post". I can't say for sure what was going through his mind - either getting a better view or getting higher for a touch on the line are my guesses - but I'd argue that shaking with the aim of distraction was not the primary intention.

                So once again the "laws" have left themselves open to interpretation through their wording. Well that's human beings for you.

                Comment

                • Meg
                  Go Swannies!
                  Site Admin
                  • Aug 2011
                  • 4828

                  Originally posted by neilfws
                  Or whatever the Latin is for "until next week".
                  Possibly: ‘ad proxima hebdomade’.

                  Anyway, you could throw that phrase into Big Footy or wherever, just as a distraction.

                  Comment

                  • Markwebbos
                    Veterans List
                    • Jul 2016
                    • 7186

                    Originally posted by stevoswan
                    After giving the non decision against Dane's goal post climbing the 'all clear', the AFL now seek a 'please explain' from Rampe. The 'you talk like a little girl' barb is also part of the follow up.

                    Did Alistair or Eddie or some other Victorian sook give Gil a call?

                    Please explain, Dane: AFL seeks answers over Rampe's antics - AFL.com.au
                    Think it’s time for Dane to have that coffee with Gil

                    Comment

                    • dejavoodoo44
                      Veterans List
                      • Apr 2015
                      • 8494

                      Originally posted by Meg
                      Possibly: ‘ad proxima hebdomade’.

                      Anyway, you could throw that phrase into Big Footy or wherever, just as a distraction.
                      Yes, and I'm pretty sure that 'ad nauseum', is what most of us have, after the previous few weeks of election campaigning.

                      Comment

                      • Sandrevan
                        Warming the Bench
                        • May 2016
                        • 355

                        I didn't hear about (or see) the Rampe incident until Saturday night. What he did had no impact on the result but in that situation the captain should be directing what the rest of the team does. Our tall players should have been camped on the goal line and the rest of the players (other than the guy on the mark) should have been running around randomly and doing handstands, etc to distract Myers. Being a larrikin is ok sometimes but he's a club captain - he needed to show more leadership. If McVeigh was playing he would have organised the players in that situation.

                        When I think about it further I wonder if Rampe has an 'I hate umpires' thing going on because he does treat them with contempt. Does this go back to the 2016 GF and subsequent games where we've been shafted by the umpires. I suspect we won't ever see his 'please explain' letter to the AFL.

                        Comment

                        • Meg
                          Go Swannies!
                          Site Admin
                          • Aug 2011
                          • 4828

                          Originally posted by Sandrevan
                          Our tall players should have been camped on the goal line and the rest of the players (other than the guy on the mark) should have been running around randomly and doing handstands, etc to distract Myers.
                          I too wondered why the players didn’t do more to try to distracf Myers. Ugg pointed out to me earlier in this thread that the talls on the field (Sinclair, Melican and Aliir) were in fact back behind the goal posts where they could have taken a running jump to try to touch the ball if necessary. I had missed that.

                          But not much was done to distract Myers (other than Rampe’s acrobatics).

                          Is there any reason why the rest of the players couldn’t line up in a formation behind the man on the mark, and as you say leap about etc.? A bit like an animated soccer wall? Or possibly in a V-formation fanning back towards the goal posts?

                          They wouldn’t do it in a normal goal kicking situation because they would be leaving opposition players unattended. But when it’s a kick after the siren?

                          Comment

                          • rb4x
                            Regular in the Side
                            • Dec 2007
                            • 968

                            Is there any rule about a player being on a team mates shoulders. If Rampe was on Sinclairs shoulders they would have a better cahnce of stopping a ball that is just going to make a goal.

                            Comment

                            • Meg
                              Go Swannies!
                              Site Admin
                              • Aug 2011
                              • 4828

                              Originally posted by rb4x
                              Is there any rule about a player being on a team mates shoulders. If Rampe was on Sinclairs shoulders they would have a better cahnce of stopping a ball that is just going to make a goal.
                              Bartel in Channel 7’s commentary explicitly mentioned that tactic was banned. I haven’t tried to find a written rule that covers it though.

                              Comment

                              • longmile
                                Crumber
                                • Apr 2011
                                • 3362

                                Surely you can specky on someone to touch it or mark it though?

                                Comment

                                Working...