-
-
Media speculation on Josh Kelly going to Norf or Essendon, Shai Bolton to WA & JUH being pryed from the Bulldogs:
AFL trade news, rumours, whispers 2021: Shai Bolton contract, Josh Kelly trade, contract, teams interested, free agentsComment
-
Shocking news for Naismith. Unfortunately that leaves us (again) with the thinnest ruck stocks in the league.
Sinclair will turn 32 before next season, Hickey is on one leg, and neither Amartey or McLean are true ruckmen. McAndrew is several years from being ready for AFL, presuming he makes it.
We simply have to trade for a ruck. Drafting a kid wont do. Maybe someone like Archie Smith of the Lions who isn't getting a game.Comment
-
I quite agree (except perhaps with the claim that we have the thinnest ruck stocks in the league). The question is what type of a ruck do we target. First, do we focus on a 'pure' ruck type, as opposed to a forward-ruck (like Chol or CCJ from Richmond). Second, are we looking for someone who is a back-up to Hickey, or are we looking for a player to be our #1 from the time they arrive.
Given how well Hickey has started, you'd think we'd back him to be our #1 ruck for the duration of his contract and get someone who's ready to step in and fill the breach. Perhaps after a few years of development McAndrew will be ready to step up when Hickey finishes (although, you'd have to say that is a real long shot given that McAndrew has hardly played the game). So, I tend to favour the idea of getting a best 22 forward-ruck to help Hickey out (unless we think that Amartey or, less likely, McLean, can be that player) and then also to get in another younger, ruck who is not likely to be a regular best 22 in the next year or two. Otherwise we may have to hold on to Sinclair longer and I hope that that is not the solution. The Chief has been good but he has reached his use-by date.
In terms of targets, if we did want to target an out-and-out first team ruck, Sean Darcy is out of contract at Freo at the end of this season and has been playing very well. He wouldn't come cheap. Also, he'd have rival suitors, most especially Geelong. Geelong have thinner ruck stocks than us (a whole bunch of quasi rucks like Stanley, Blicavs, Ratugolea) and also Sean Darcy comes from the Geelong area and used to play for the Falcons. So, if it weren't for the fact that you wouldn't think Geelong would have the cap space, I'd think they'd be favourites to attract Darcy away from Freo, if anyone were. So, despite the attraction, I think Darcy probably isn't going anywhere and we're not the right fit for him while we have Hickey playing so well.
For lesser light targets, I'm not so sure. I don't claim the ability to be able to identify talented players years before they reach their peak. Sam Hayes at Port could be one although I think there are questions over his tank and his competitiveness, and either he or we were not interested in that deal last year when we were looking at getting a Port ruck in return for Aliir.
Does anyone else have inside mail on developing young rucks in other teams that might be prepared to leave for a #2 ruck spot with us?All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)
Comment
-
Mason Cox is out of contract but is not young and not a great ruckman.Comment
-
Sean Darcy is far too young for Geelong’s list profile at 23, but will be too expensive for us I suspect.
I don’t think the Tigers can hang onto all of their rucks: Soldo, Nank, Chol, CCJ plus Ryan, although there will be a lot of suitors for any that become available.
Other names I’ve seen mentioned are:
Hayes
Ladhams
XerriComment
-
I'm sure that list managers would have noted the performance of Max Lynch, for Collingwood yesterday. He's a 22 year old, late convert to the game, who's been on their list since 2017, but has hardly played a game, behind Grundy, and to a lesser extent, Cameron and Cox. Given his chance against Melbourne, he beat Gawn in the hit outs. Appears to be only contracted to the end of this season.Comment
-
Lynch is a great suggestion! Hayes I mentioned already. Ladhams (a) didn't want to come to the Swans last year; and (b) doubly won't want to leave Port to be a second fiddle, whereas last year he would have been offered the role that Hickey has now. The great thing about the Lynch suggestion is that he comes from the Riverina and we might be more attractive than Collingwood in the sense that he could be our #1 ruckman in 3 years time when hopefully we'll be contending - to use an expression favoured by Horse - "up to our eyeballs". Chol + Lynch - get it done Kinnear!All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated, and well supported in logic and argument than others. -Douglas Adams, author (11 Mar 1952-2001)Comment
-
Plus Collingwood need to trade someone (or ones) out to get enough draft currency for Daicos, let alone their NDS prospect. They probably won't want to lose another clear first-22 player so might be grateful to get something reasonable in return for a fringe player like Lynch.Comment
-
If he out rucked Gawn can’t imagine he’ll be fringe for too long!Comment
-
"You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
-
Seems a very decent shout. I didn't watch yesterday's game, but by all reports Lynch was pretty impressive.
Its a tough position we are in related to the ruck issue - we are probably genuinely 2-3 years off truly being in a good spot to challenge for a flag. But as Hickey has shown this year - a good ruckman can quickly make an enormous difference to a team also. So a good trade to give us a proper depth could propel things forward. We have to be a decent chance to snare one from around the traps if we go that way you would hope."You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."Comment
-
Happy for Kelly to exercise his rights in the GWS contract he holds - 8 years at $1mill/year, nice anchor for their cap
On previous ruck target posts - Geelong always have cap space (Sean Darcy), Pies currently don't have enough points to match a top 5 bid on Nick Daicos (Lynch)Comment
-
I think Grundy would be more available than Lynch if a team was prepared to take on his massively bloated contract. Cox would also be available but again not value for money.Comment
- If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
- RWO Forum Rules (PLEASE READ FIRST)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Your posts may be deleted, without warning or notification at moderator discretion, for breach of any of the RWO rules set out below. If you have any questions or concerns about post/thread removal, please feel free to PM a moderator or Email us at [email protected]
Do not post your queries on the main boards. Such posts WILL be removed, without further explanation.
Constant breaches of the rules will result in your access to RWO being reduced as the Moderator / Administrator group see fit. RWO uses the vBulletin Infraction System to deal with breaches of the RWO rules. All Infractions have an expiry date. Such an expiry date may be as short as 10 days or as long as 6 months. Multiple infractions, depending on the number of points a member accumulates, WILL result in temporary bans from the site and CAN result in a permanent ban. Please note that some Infractions have an expiry date of "Never" and WILL result in the RWO member being banned from the site immediately.
1) Signatures / Avatars
Keep signatures under 4 lines of standard sized fonts (if you must use large fonts, use just one line) as a courtesy to all users who read the forums.
Do not use signatures / avatars as an opportunity to make jibes at other forum members. This will be considered to be sniping (refer Rule 6 below). You may not refer to another RWO forum member, or quote anything they have written, without permission from that member. Using an anonymous tag does not make it acceptable. If quotes are not removed, we reserve the right to remove them, without notification. If in doubt as to whether something is acceptable or not, don't use it!
2) Spamming
Advertising for personal commercial purposes is NOT permitted. Placing links to sites that other users may find of interest / personal websites is acceptable within reason (ie constantly posting links will be frowned upon).
3) Deliberately avoiding the RWO swear filter
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. A swear filter is in place to mask offensive words and phrases. This swear filter contains offensive words and variant spellings of offensive words to stop you from deliberately avoiding the swear filter. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter through alternate spelling of offensive words. Do not attempt to avoid the swear filter by devising systems to fool the swear filter in its recognition of offensive words.
4) Inappropriate Language / Excessive swearing
RWO is a site that is accessible by Swans supporters of all ages and walks of life. Moderators will let some minor cases through. Anything deemed to be of poor taste or of an offensive nature may be removed at moderator discretion. Consider all members when posting; what you think is funny, not all members will feel the same way.
5) Trolling / Baiting
Deliberately posting on threads in an attempt to stir / bait other RWO users will not be tolerated.
6) Flaming / Sniping / Abuse / Insulting other members
If you have to have a go at someone personally, take it off the boards. Everyone else doesn't need to see your hissy fits. Remember, "Play the ball, not the man". This includes spouses or partners. If you don''t like a post, don't flame, snipe, abuse or insult in response - it makes the job of moderation much harder. Report the post through the forum reporting mechanism (click on the Triangle with the exclamation mark) and let the Moderator / Administrator group deal with it.
7) Legal issuesa) The Moderator / Administrator group will keep a very close eye on threads discussing rumours or anything that could be potentially libellous. Moderators and Administrators are not interested in the chance of legal action regardless of how small - if deemed that there is ANY threat to RWO potentially, we will come down hard on it.
b) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and the potential legal implications, posting of complete articles is NOT permitted. If necessary, post a link to the article. Where appropriate, you may quote sections of the article to aid in discussion.
c) Due to potential issues of copyright infringement and potential legal implications, posting of links to "live streaming (of AFL games)" and "AFL content" sites that are not AFL endorsed is NOT permitted. Posts with such links will be removed immediately and infraction points will be issued.
d) Freedom of speech does NOT = freedom to slander
8) Racial / Sexual Discrimination / Villification
It is not acceptable for members to engage in racial and/or sexual discrimination / villification. It is not acceptable for members to use terminology in describing race or gender in a derogatory manner. Discussing and disputing the views and opinions of other posters is acceptable. Personally vilifying or abusing others for having certain characteristics, or being a member of a certain group (or because you think they're a member of a certain group), is not. This rule shall apply to any post attacking race, skin colour, ethnic background, gender and sexuality.
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 9
See also: ---> RACIAL DISCRIMINATION ACT 1975 - SECT 18C
9) Prohibited
Anything deemed to be of Adult content or porn related nature will be removed immediately. Selling or offering of drugs, drug references, other than those openly discussed and identified in the press, will also be removed immediately. Breaches of this rule carry the highest infraction points and may result in permanent bans on a first offence.
10) Off-topic Posts
Some members prefer to just read Swans or footy related posts. This is, after all, a SSFC website. Ensure you post threads in the appropriate forum, or they will be moved. While threads will sometimes move away from the original topic, do not deliberately drag a thread away from its original subject.
11) Attachments
Attachments within the size limit prescribed are permitted. However, due to costs associated with uploads/downloads, if you wish to attach a number of files within a thread, or feel that the quality of the attachment is compromised by the file size restrictions, you may wish to use external hosting providers and link to the files there.
12) Moderator / Administrator Group
The Moderator / Administrator group reserve the right to delete or move threads / posts as well as remove signatures / avatars as necessary according to the rules of the RWO forum.
13) Final decisions
Any decisions made around the intepretation of the rules above are entirely at the discretion of the site administrators. Such decisions are final.
14) Vistitors from other sites
You are most welcome to join in discussions on RWO, but remember, you are a GUEST on our site. Abide by the RWO Forum Rules or we WILL ban you.
15) Guidelines regarding Visitors to RWO for RWO members.
Be nice, not all visitors are trolls.a) If they annoy you, ignore them. They want a reaction. Don't give them one.
b) If they are abusive, report them. We will consider banning them. Don't stoop to their level.Bottom line
You are a guest on RWO - You are expected to play by the rules of the house.
Last Update: ScottH, June 22nd, 2008 (Included Spouses/partners in Rule 6)
Last Update: Frog, August 16th, 2010 (Added rule 7c)
Last update: ScottH July 17th, 2011 (Added Rule 7d)
Tweet
© RedAndWhiteOnline.com 2003-
Powered by vBulletin® Version 6.0.6
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2025 MH Sub I, LLC dba vBulletin. All rights reserved.
All times are GMT+10. This page was generated at 06:58 AM.
Comment