2023 List Management
Collapse
X
-
Draft experts Matt Rendell and Cal Twomey give first indication into quality of 2023 class (sen.com.au)
Rendell says the draft quality isn't as good as last year.
Twomey says this year's draft is more mixed with regards to the positions of players, it's not a draft full of first-round midfielders."Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi finalComment
-
Draft experts Matt Rendell and Cal Twomey give first indication into quality of 2023 class (sen.com.au)
Rendell says the draft quality isn't as good as last year.
Twomey says this year's draft is more mixed with regards to the positions of players, it's not a draft full of first-round midfielders.Comment
-
Tojo
The general consensus both on this site, and in the general press is what you are proposing is exactly what we did this year with the focus on locking in the young talent for the long term. The criticism on all fronts is we should have been in the free agent market last year.
We are already investing game time into the players you have mentioned. Unfortunately both McDonald and Armartey have, together with many others, been injured for long periods this year which has hindered their development, however there is no doubting their talent.
Both McLean and Buller are at best long shots. Would love to be proven wrong, but know is the time to be active in the free agency market.Comment
-
Mick McGuane is quoted in his newspaper column saying that if Buddy goes then Reid will probably get a one-year contract. Should Reid be given another contract or does the club terminate his services and fill his spot with a player via a trade or with a player from the draft. Thoughts? I am on the fence with this one.Comment
-
Mick McGuane is quoted in his newspaper column saying that if Buddy goes then Reid will probably get a one-year contract. Should Reid be given another contract or does the club terminate his services and fill his spot with a player via a trade or with a player from the draft. Thoughts? I am on the fence with this one.Comment
-
What about Granger-Barrass is he worth an ask ?Comment
-
Mick McGuane is quoted in his newspaper column saying that if Buddy goes then Reid will probably get a one-year contract. Should Reid be given another contract or does the club terminate his services and fill his spot with a player via a trade or with a player from the draft. Thoughts? I am on the fence with this one.
If trade in a player that likely takes away a draft pick, possibly two, but that still makes three to five new players, possibly more.
Based on recent history, we will probably have a total of say six to seven retirements and delistings, but two won’t be replaced because Reid and Paddy are on the long term injury list and not taking a list spot.
So it is rather early, but at some stage we will need to be considering which day, seven players go, go allow us to recruit five new ones via draft/trade. Or which six go to allow us four new players.
Let’s say:
- Franklin
- Paddy
- Clarke
- Gould
We still have to find two to three to let go… Sheather? Wicks? Magor? Owen? Arnold/Buller if they don’t or pan out? Could be Tom McCartin if he has similar concussion vulnerability as Paddy.
Somone suggested Rankin earlier but there was one strong reply against that.
So with that in mind, I think whether Reid stays depends on whether we lose Tom McCartin and/or how Arnold/Buller develop.
If all three are retired/delisted, I think we need to keep Reid as a tall for another year.
I think it is too early to contemplate the delistings and retirements, though it is certainly relevant re trade targets and what picks we want to keep, upgrade or downgrade.Comment
-
Reid has lucky to survive as long as he has given his injuries. Time to say thanks and bye bye.Comment
-
-
My point was merely this. Some in the media and others seem to be of the opinion that we need to replace Buddy by going after some established key position forward. I was trying to make the point that if we rate Amartey and McDonald, we do not need to. They hopefully are our future with McLean and Buller potentially as backups. Today is the first time for ages if ever that Amartey and McDonald have shared the forward line. They have the potential to be a great team. But how can that synergy develop if we bring in another key forward next year or have Reid play on? It will be the same as when Buddy comes back in as the main man, that opportunity will be lost.Comment
-
My point was merely this. Some in the media and others seem to be of the opinion that we need to replace Buddy by going after some established key position forward. I was trying to make the point that if we rate Amartey and McDonald, we do not need to. They hopefully are our future with McLean and Buller potentially as backups. Today is the first time for ages if ever that Amartey and McDonald have shared the forward line. They have the potential to be a great team. But how can that synergy develop if we bring in another key forward next year or have Reid play on? It will be the same as when Buddy comes back in as the main man, that opportunity will be lost."Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi finalComment
-
My point was merely this. Some in the media and others seem to be of the opinion that we need to replace Buddy by going after some established key position forward. I was trying to make the point that if we rate Amartey and McDonald, we do not need to. They hopefully are our future with McLean and Buller potentially as backups. Today is the first time for ages if ever that Amartey and McDonald have shared the forward line. They have the potential to be a great team. But how can that synergy develop if we bring in another key forward next year or have Reid play on? It will be the same as when Buddy comes back in as the main man, that opportunity will be lost.Comment
-
Can’t see any reason at all you’d keep Reid on the list unless he’s prepared to play for peanuts and we see him in a mentoring roleComment
Comment