Colless has to go

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • footyhead
    Banned indefinitely by Moderators for posting totally inappropriate material
    • May 2003
    • 1367

    Colless has to go

    A lot of people are calling for Paul Roos head, but I think the Swans administration have a lot to answer for.
    Fancy employing a senior coach who has only studied under one coach in his life, never actualy coached any team to a premiership and never coached any team for even a whole season.

    These guys are a most lax administration when you compare them to the top footballing administrations.

    There is a lot more to running a successful football club than making sure that your corporate sponsors are on board.

    Colless has had his time, he needs to hand over the reigns to somebody who actualy has some ideas about how this club might win a flag.
  • Mike_B
    Peyow Peyow
    • Jan 2003
    • 6267

    #2
    The board and the football department are separate areas of the club. The board looks at finances and running the club as an entity, the football club worry about the on-field issues. The board is the least of our worries at the moment - its the football department that is not performing at the moment.

    I'm on the Chandwagon!!!

    If you cannot compete for the premiership, it's better to be young and exciting than middle-aged and dowdy.

    Comment

    • footyhead
      Banned indefinitely by Moderators for posting totally inappropriate material
      • May 2003
      • 1367

      #3
      Who employed Roos ??

      Comment

      • EMJ
        Go Swans Always
        • Jan 2003
        • 1076

        #4
        you make me sick - Roos to go etc or Colless to go.
        For goodness sake - are you all miracle makers.
        Great coaches can do no wrong - what a brilliant bunch of know alls.
        Love those Swans

        Comment

        • Margie
          Regular in the Side
          • Sep 2003
          • 800

          #5
          F...head, why don't you go for the job, mate? You're like a boring bloody broken record. Normally don't even read your illiterate rantings, but tolerance levels are low tonight!

          Comment

          • EMJ
            Go Swans Always
            • Jan 2003
            • 1076

            #6
            Well said Margie I agree completely.
            Love those Swans

            Comment

            • Damien
              Living in 2005
              • Jan 2003
              • 3713

              #7
              Re: Colless has to go

              Originally posted by footyhead
              A lot of people are calling for Paul Roos head, but I think the Swans administration have a lot to answer for.
              .
              Well if Roos does end up failing - perhaps the minority of fans claiming they influenced the decision to hire him could step aside........

              Comment

              • barry
                Veterans List
                • Jan 2003
                • 8499

                #8
                When we took Roos, we had a choice of him or Wallace. I'm happy with that choice. But if Sheedy, Mathews, Pagan, or even Daniher or Malthouse, want to have a go up here, I tell Roos where to stick his "tempo football".

                Comment

                • EMJ
                  Go Swans Always
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 1076

                  #9
                  Roos isn't going to fail - he will change tactic or pull the team up.
                  I like all of you would like to see us win this year - but I think we need to change some of our players and obviously get some more tall or well built players.
                  Schneider, McVeigh and Spriggs are not strong enough.
                  My only comments in the negative.
                  Today's game is over and we look forward to the next and hope for a win.
                  Love those Swans

                  Comment

                  • Damien
                    Living in 2005
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 3713

                    #10
                    Originally posted by janpa
                    Roos isn't going to fail - he will change tactic or pull the team up.
                    .
                    Hope you are right, but I am seeing a rabble at the moment....

                    The players that could improve the immediate situation (Ball, Williams) are likely to be gone in the next year or so...

                    He has a lot of work to do, and this is his real chance to prove himself either way.

                    Comment

                    • Schneiderman
                      The Fourth Captain
                      • Aug 2004
                      • 1615

                      #11
                      Originally posted by janpa
                      I like all of you would like to see us win this year - but I think we need to change some of our players and obviously get some more tall or well built players.
                      Have patience. He deliberately brought in the long list of Rookies this year to find exactly this. A lot of mature age players like Vogels who *should* fill the gap we currently have.

                      As for bringing in Sheedy (13th), Malthouse (15th) or even Mathews (11th), I'm not sure I understand why just yet. Its only fair to give a coach a fair go, and two years probably aint it.
                      Our Greatest Moment:

                      Saturday, 24th Sept, 2005 - 5:13pm

                      Comment

                      • liz
                        Veteran
                        Site Admin
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 16795

                        #12
                        Re: Colless has to go

                        Originally posted by footyhead
                        A lot of people are calling for Paul Roos head
                        Are they? I thought that was mostly you?

                        Voices calling for Roos' head have been in the minority, at least on here, even amidst the current frustration.

                        Every club goes through a tough patch and the average supporter seems to have the memory span of a gnat. It ain't pretty at the moment and it's hard to see a way out of the slump but I'd be livid if the club didn't stick with Roos at the moment.

                        Look at Daniher, look at Thompson. Both have looked to be on the brink at times over the past 3 or 4 years, coaching teams that looked like a rabble. And both have created solid, exciting teams. Coaching isn't an easy job but I'm bemused how people who 12-18 months ago were hailing Roos as the Swans' saviour are so unsure of their convictions that they aren't prepared to wait and see whether he really has what it takes.

                        Comment

                        • desredandwhite
                          Click!
                          • Jan 2003
                          • 2498

                          #13
                          To be honest, I don't know just HOW MUCH impact a coach has. They certainly would influence the preparation and the mindset of some players, but they are not the ones kicking the ball, or tackling, or contesting the ruck.

                          Sadly I'm not sure there's any one single solution to our problems.. Sacking Colless, or sacking Roos, or dropping player x....Would be a nice easy solution, but I don't think that's it.

                          A whole lot of things have to go right for a club to win a premiership, and we're desperately lacking in many of those areas!

                          177th Senior AFL Match - Round 4, 2009 - Sydney vs Carlton, SCG. This is obviously out of date. I suppose I'll update it once I could be bothered sitting down with the fixture and working it out....
                          Des' Weblog

                          Comment

                          • Nolie
                            On the wing
                            • Jul 2004
                            • 522

                            #14
                            Originally posted by barry
                            When we took Roos, we had a choice of him or Wallace. I'm happy with that choice. But if Sheedy, Mathews, Pagan, or even Daniher or Malthouse, want to have a go up here, I tell Roos where to stick his "tempo football".
                            You are ascribing too much influence to a coach. I wouldn't have any of those old hacks. You cannot make "silk out of a sow's ears". Roos simply does not have the cattle. The gentlemen you mention would just cost an arm and leg simply because they have "reputation". Reputation won't do any good under these current circumsatnces.

                            Comment

                            • Nolie
                              On the wing
                              • Jul 2004
                              • 522

                              #15
                              Re: Re: Colless has to go

                              Originally posted by liz
                              Are they? I thought that was mostly you?

                              ..... but I'd be livid if the club didn't stick with Roos at the moment.

                              Look at Daniher, look at Thompson. Both have looked to be on the brink at times over the past 3 or 4 years, coaching teams that looked like a rabble.
                              Totally agree. Well said.

                              Comment

                              Working...