Trade Whispers / Rumours and Confirmations

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • GordonS
    On the Rookie List
    • May 2013
    • 129

    probably highly unlikely, but if we get josh bruce from em i'd be happy. looked good as a tall defender

    Comment

    • Mug Punter
      On the Rookie List
      • Nov 2009
      • 3325

      Originally posted by ernie koala
      So, GWS have said they will do a deal for Lamb rather than PSD....

      If it's a player swap that suits us, that's fine.....

      If it's for pick 48, let him go through to the PSD.

      They must have their eyes on someone else with their No.1 PSD pick.
      Spot on, we hold the cards with this trade. If all they want is Jed then he is theirs for nowt

      If they want Jed and Everitt then they will probably need to offer a fair trade upgrade (Pick 48 has no use to us).

      If they want Jed, Everitt and PSD Pick 1 then our position is stronger ((of course we won't know if this the case but I reckon it probably is)

      I'd offer Jed and Dre for 35 to 21 upgrade. That is more than fair. Part of me would like us to completely scupper their strategy by sending Dre and Jed to the PSD. I would have had no issue with us have a complete trading ban with them but I guess that would be a little petty

      This should pretty much be the last time that the Bogans control the draft. From next season on their main issue will be the list of young players coming off contract wanting to get the hell out of that joke of a club. This season is critical for them, reckon 5 wins is the absolute minimum required. I'll be death-riding them as usual

      - - - Updated - - -

      Originally posted by dimelb
      I'd be happy to see Dre at Melbourne, or even StK. They both need him more than we do, and would regularly play him in the firsts.
      Dre would be a good addition for Melbourne. I'd like to see them do OK next season, they actually have the makings of a reasonable side

      Comment

      • Dan
        Warming the Bench
        • Oct 2010
        • 338

        Rumor on Facebook
        "AFL Draft, Trade, Free Agency, List and General News
        Tony Armstrong has landed himself in a bit of a pickle. He knocked back a move to Collingwood and now Sydney are about to delist him."
        I See It But I Don't Believe It!!!!

        Comment

        • BillyRayCypress
          On the Rookie List
          • May 2012
          • 1379

          That idiot Mathews is still going on about the Buddy deal being irresponsible. Get over it, you lost you fool !!!!!!!!

          The man just doesn't know how to let go. Great maturity leading GWS.
          Nothing like a good light bulb moment.

          Comment

          • Triple B
            Formerly 'BBB'
            • Feb 2003
            • 6999

            Originally posted by BillyRayCypress
            That idiot Mathews is still going on about the Buddy deal being irresponsible. Get over it, you lost you fool !!!!!!!!

            The man just doesn't know how to let go. Great maturity leading GWS.
            In truth, he didn't actually lose because they were never actually in the race. It's clear now that Buddy approached the Swans to try and get him to us and if we could not do the deal I have no doubt he'd still be at Hawthorn.

            The media ran with GWS, understandably, as his destination from the minute he announced all talks would be held over to the end of the season. Pickering was also happy to run with the GWS flow because it took the pressure off trying to get a deal brokered with the Swans.

            You're right tho Billy, he needs to move on, they haven't exactly done poorly from us with the Mummy deal with other deals still to play out.
            Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

            Comment

            • ShockOfHair
              One Man Out
              • Dec 2007
              • 3668

              With the current rate of departures, I'm led to believe this is the contingency plan for next year:

              B: Malceski Ted LRT
              HB: Mattner Grundy Blakey
              C: Crouch McVeigh McGlynn
              HF Franklin Tippett Goodes
              F: O'Loughlin Longmire ROK

              R: Pyke JPK Jack

              Bench: Dew, Hank, Reid (no sub)
              The man who laughs has not yet heard the terrible news

              Comment

              • Alan
                On the Rookie List
                • Mar 2012
                • 156

                Originally posted by ShockOfHair
                With the current rate of departures, I'm led to believe this is the contingency plan for next year:

                B: Malceski Ted LRT
                HB: Mattner Grundy Blakey
                C: Crouch McVeigh McGlynn
                HF Franklin Tippett Goodes
                F: O'Loughlin Longmire ROK

                R: Pyke JPK Jack

                Bench: Dew, Hank, Reid (no sub)
                Ahemm, excuse me, Tony Lockett is ....where???

                Comment

                • Meg
                  Go Swannies!
                  Site Admin
                  • Aug 2011
                  • 4828

                  Originally posted by Alan
                  Ahemm, excuse me, Tony Lockett is ....where???
                  Nick Davis??

                  Comment

                  • Ludwig
                    Veterans List
                    • Apr 2007
                    • 9359

                    This sort of player movement we are seeing, for more money and better opportunities is the way of the world in the age of free agency. The public, fans, club administrators and journos need to adjust. You don't have to be an official free agent to quit your club; if you are out of contract, you can just strike a deal with another club and quit your present club and depending of circumstances, like PSD position, there's not much a club can do about it. Chances are you are going to get where you want go.

                    The Giants have squandered all that AFL cash to escalate the bidding war for players which will be a huge detriment to the league in the long run. They're collecting players like vintage cars. They're going to have a lot of them sitting in the garage, collecting dust. We are well on the way to seeing the kind of transfers that are usual fare for other sports. Prices will go up. Stars will be moving at every opportunity. The Swans management seem to understand this and perhaps that's why they aren't putting up much of a fight. We got our man; we knew we had to lose a few players to get him on board; we selected the players we felt we could lose and simply didn't offer them contracts, or offered them poor ones. This has been in the works a long time, otherwise Mummy would have had a contract a long time ago. It seems this player loss has been well anticipated.

                    Draft picks are greatly devalued now. What's the point in drafting a young star if they just quit the club a few years later when there contract has expired. You take on the development cost, while another club reaps the benefit. You are seeing some of the smarter clubs, like the Swans and GC, locking up the most critical players with long term contract. It's more important than ever to be seen as a club that players want to go to. The Swans have got a big lead in the culture wars, which bodes well for the future.

                    Comment

                    • BillyRayCypress
                      On the Rookie List
                      • May 2012
                      • 1379

                      Originally posted by Alan
                      Ahemm, excuse me, Tony Lockett is ....where???
                      He's having an icy bear pole ice cream (forgot the name of what he used to like) whilst flogging off his greyhound. What was it called ??? Fine Cotton or something.
                      Nothing like a good light bulb moment.

                      Comment

                      • liz
                        Veteran
                        Site Admin
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 16787

                        Originally posted by ShockOfHair
                        With the current rate of departures, I'm led to believe this is the contingency plan for next year:

                        B: Malceski Ted LRT
                        HB: Mattner Grundy Blakey
                        C: Crouch McVeigh McGlynn
                        HF Franklin Tippett Goodes
                        F: O'Loughlin Longmire ROK

                        R: Pyke JPK Jack

                        Bench: Dew, Hank, Reid (no sub)
                        Ireland was a handy player in his time too. And maybe we can find a spot for Stuey Maxfield.

                        Comment

                        • ernie koala
                          Senior Player
                          • May 2007
                          • 3251

                          Richard Colless was a no frills back pocket in the Wafl wasn't he?...Surely a spot on the bench is deserved.
                          Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MT

                          Comment

                          • bennyfabulous
                            Warming the Bench
                            • Apr 2009
                            • 351

                            Surely our list guys should have seen these departures coming. Disappointed with weak mummy trade (39) and will be even further disappointed if Lamb goes for a pittance too. We really need to nip this in the bud, GWS are bending us over.

                            Comment

                            • Mug Punter
                              On the Rookie List
                              • Nov 2009
                              • 3325

                              Originally posted by bennyfabulous
                              Surely our list guys should have seen these departures coming. Disappointed with weak mummy trade (39) and will be even further disappointed if Lamb goes for a pittance too. We really need to nip this in the bud, GWS are bending us over.
                              Welcome to the brave new world of free agency.

                              Best strategy is for us to create an environment that players want to be in and try and re-sign players 12-18 months before their deals end. Can see longer term deals becoming more common with 4+ year deals for the top 15-20 players in any AFL club.

                              Mummy was disappointing but given that GWS missed out on him and have an additional $1M in their salary cap there was no way we could afford him once Buddy signed.

                              I believe Mummy is relatively easy to replace and that none of the other losses to date (including Dre as he will probably still leave) are in our top 20.

                              Comment

                              • liz
                                Veteran
                                Site Admin
                                • Jan 2003
                                • 16787

                                Originally posted by Mug Punter
                                Welcome to the brave new world of free agency.

                                Best strategy is for us to create an environment that players want to be in and try and re-sign players 12-18 months before their deals end. Can see longer term deals becoming more common with 4+ year deals for the top 15-20 players in any AFL club.

                                Mummy was disappointing but given that GWS missed out on him and have an additional $1M in their salary cap there was no way we could afford him once Buddy signed.

                                I believe Mummy is relatively easy to replace and that none of the other losses to date (including Dre as he will probably still leave) are in our top 20.
                                Arguably, that's exactly what the Swans have done / are doing. They've secured Jetta, Hanners, Parker, Rohan and JPK over the last 12 months or so. These were obviously higher priority than Jed. Had they made Jed a priority, they'd have offered him a larger contract and/or tried to tie him up earlier in the season.

                                I'm a little disappointed that Jed is going but not devastated. Losing a Parker or Hanners would have been far more of a blow. Both of them seem to love the club and never thought about leaving.

                                Comment

                                Working...