The Real Cost of Buddy?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • top40
    Regular in the Side
    • May 2007
    • 933

    #91
    Originally posted by mcs
    From the position we are in, 2-3 would be an ok result. But from the draw we've had, in my opinion its far from a pass mark. Despite our ongoing crappy injury story, I'd say 95% of people on here would of expected us to be at worst 3-2 after 5 rounds, probably 4-1 would represent a pass mark for most before the season started. Hawthorn are missing plenty of troops, including a large part of their defence, but they are still at 2-0 and looking reasonable.
    Swans are notorious slow starters. Witness:

    1996. Eventually Grand Finalists. At Round 2 was 0-2 with a percentage of 48, and coming 3rd last on the ladder.
    1999. Eventually played finals. At Round 5 was 1-4 with a percentage of 66, and coming 3rd last on the ladder.
    2003. Eventually Preliminary Finalists. At Round 4 was 1-3, and in the bottom 5. For the Round 5 game against Melbourne they were 20 points behind at three quarter time.
    2005. Eventually Premiers. At Round 6 was 2-4, and in the bottom 5. For the Round 7 game against Essendon they were 16 points behind at three quarter time.
    2006. Eventually Grand Finalists. At Round 4 was 1-3, and in the bottom 5.

    Comment

    • ScottH
      It's Goodes to cheer!!
      • Sep 2003
      • 23665

      #92
      Originally posted by top40
      Swans are notorious slow starters. Witness:

      1996. Eventually Grand Finalists. At Round 2 was 0-2 with a percentage of 48, and coming 3rd last on the ladder.
      1999. Eventually played finals. At Round 5 was 1-4 with a percentage of 66, and coming 3rd last on the ladder.
      2003. Eventually Preliminary Finalists. At Round 4 was 1-3, and in the bottom 5. For the Round 5 game against Melbourne they were 20 points behind at three quarter time.
      2005. Eventually Premiers. At Round 6 was 2-4, and in the bottom 5. For the Round 7 game against Essendon they were 16 points behind at three quarter time.
      2006. Eventually Grand Finalists. At Round 4 was 1-3, and in the bottom 5.
      I know.
      But it doesn't make me feel any better about our start.
      April has always been a losing month for us in the past.

      Comment

      • top40
        Regular in the Side
        • May 2007
        • 933

        #93
        Consistent with what I wrote, the Swans are typically slow starters. I wouldn't however say they always perform badly in April:

        They were undefeated and four from four in April 1998 and April 2012. They also only lost one game out of four in April in 1996, 2004, 2007, 2008 (with a draw), 2010, and 2013.

        Comment

        • Triple B
          Formerly 'BBB'
          • Feb 2003
          • 6999

          #94
          Originally posted by top40
          2005. Eventually Premiers. At Round 6 was 2-4, and in the bottom 5.....
          ...and playing an ugly brand of football that will never win a flag.
          Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

          Comment

          • ShockOfHair
            One Man Out
            • Dec 2007
            • 3668

            #95
            Originally posted by top40
            Swans are notorious slow starters. Witness:

            1996. Eventually Grand Finalists. At Round 2 was 0-2 with a percentage of 48, and coming 3rd last on the ladder.
            1999. Eventually played finals. At Round 5 was 1-4 with a percentage of 66, and coming 3rd last on the ladder.
            2003. Eventually Preliminary Finalists. At Round 4 was 1-3, and in the bottom 5. For the Round 5 game against Melbourne they were 20 points behind at three quarter time.
            2005. Eventually Premiers. At Round 6 was 2-4, and in the bottom 5. For the Round 7 game against Essendon they were 16 points behind at three quarter time.
            2006. Eventually Grand Finalists. At Round 4 was 1-3, and in the bottom 5.
            I think until we got GWS as our Round 1 bunnies we'd gone two or three years losing to the Saints in the season opener. 2011-12 were outliers. Normal service just resumed.
            The man who laughs has not yet heard the terrible news

            Comment

            • swantastic
              Veterans List
              • Jan 2006
              • 7275

              #96
              buddy is a good player..but hes no good for the swans and way over priced
              Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

              Comment

              • ScottH
                It's Goodes to cheer!!
                • Sep 2003
                • 23665

                #97
                Originally posted by top40
                Consistent with what I wrote, the Swans are typically slow starters. I wouldn't however say they always perform badly in April:

                They were undefeated and four from four in April 1998 and April 2012. They also only lost one game out of four in April in 1996, 2004, 2007, 2008 (with a draw), 2010, and 2013.
                Interesting.
                I remember a few threads from years ago, where we were all bemoaning the fact that we didn't win in April too often.
                Going by those years, it could have been 2005 and 2006.

                Comment

                • ScottH
                  It's Goodes to cheer!!
                  • Sep 2003
                  • 23665

                  #98
                  Originally posted by swantastic
                  buddy is a good player..but hes no good for the swans and way over priced
                  brokenrecord.jpg

                  Comment

                  • Triple B
                    Formerly 'BBB'
                    • Feb 2003
                    • 6999

                    #99
                    Originally posted by ScottH
                    Interesting.
                    I remember a few threads from years ago, where we were all bemoaning the fact that we didn't win in April too often.
                    Going by those years, it could have been 2005 and 2006.
                    Time gets away from us as we get older Scott...
                    Driver of the Dan Hannebery bandwagon....all aboard. 4th April 09

                    Comment

                    • swantastic
                      Veterans List
                      • Jan 2006
                      • 7275

                      Originally posted by ScottH
                      [ATTACH=CONFIG]997[/ATTACH]
                      hahahahahahahah funny boy

                      - - - Updated - - -

                      Originally posted by Triple B
                      Time gets away from us as we get older Scott...
                      and scott is bloody old
                      Now this is a thread that i would expect on the ego -centric, wank session that is redandwhiteonline.com...

                      Comment

                      • Matt80
                        Suspended by the MRP
                        • Sep 2013
                        • 1802

                        It's been reported by the Herald Sun that Melbourne defender James Frawley wants $800,000 a year, in free agency. This guy is a one time All Australian and I believe other key defenders in the comp such as Harry Taylor, Josh Gibson, Brian Lake, Ben Reid and probably Ted Richards have shown themselves to be better defenders than James over the last three years.

                        When you consider that Buddy is costing us on average $1,111,000 a year, it?s clear what a good value get that Buddy is for the Swans. James will play some good games, but Buddy will provide between 10-15 games a year for the Swans like he did against the Crows.

                        Comment

                        • bloodsbigot
                          Regular in the Side
                          • Mar 2010
                          • 813

                          Originally posted by Matt80
                          It's been reported by the Herald Sun that Melbourne defender James Frawley wants $800,000 a year, in free agency. This guy is a one time All Australian and I believe other key defenders in the comp such as Harry Taylor, Josh Gibson, Brian Lake, Ben Reid and probably Ted Richards have shown themselves to be better defenders than James over the last three years.

                          When you consider that Buddy is costing us on average $1,111,000 a year, it?s clear what a good value get that Buddy is for the Swans. James will play some good games, but Buddy will provide between 10-15 games a year for the Swans like he did against the Crows.
                          Gotta start with a high price I guess when it comes to negotiation. Otherwise he'll have nothing to work with.

                          The cost of Buddy will be small in hindsight. I'm starting to believe what the swans did was extremely well-planned. Wait until inflation sets in... then we will have gotten Buddy for peanuts. Each year, the salary cap seems to go up. Our younger players will have nothing at all to worry about.

                          Comment

                          • Ludwig
                            Veterans List
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 9359

                            Word is that Frawley has already been offered 800 k to change clubs, so that's the new base.

                            Comment

                            • chalbilto
                              Senior Player
                              • Oct 2007
                              • 1139

                              So if you were a recruiter who would you rather have Frawley at $800K or Buddy at $1Million? Buddy deal is looking o.k. even allowing for 10 years.

                              Comment

                              • ScottH
                                It's Goodes to cheer!!
                                • Sep 2003
                                • 23665

                                Originally posted by top40
                                Consistent with what I wrote, the Swans are typically slow starters. I wouldn't however say they always perform badly in April:

                                They were undefeated and four from four in April 1998 and April 2012. They also only lost one game out of four in April in 1996, 2004, 2007, 2008 (with a draw), 2010, and 2013.
                                3 wins from 10 games in April 2005 and 2006.

                                Comment

                                Working...