2018 trading, drafting and list management: players and personnel
Collapse
X
-
Now that Hogan is staying at the Demons, they won't be chasing Stephen May (so they said anyway).
Which means the Wobbles are a top chance to secure May if he decides to move...You'd think
Which in turn means Langdon will be more expendable to the Wobbles...You'd think.
Which in turn enhances our chance of securing Langdon....You'd think.
I'm searching for some positives out of today, and this is the best I can come up with.Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it's time to pause and reflect... MTComment
-
Comment
-
Yeah, that post and pic had me asking the same question.....
......and do we as Swans give a flying **** what the AFL 'footy world' thinks? I know I don't.....From reading the comments and thinking about the Hanners' trade, I believe that football people will focus on it heavily over the coming few years. Essentially it's a salary dump trade given the Swans got so little in return, so history will see it one of 3 ways depending on what transpires from now.
One, if he returns to his form of 2016 and before then it will be seen as a huge win for the Saints. Perhaps one of the most one-sided trades in recent history. Second, if he continues to struggle, then a brilliant trade by the Swans to ruthlessly recognize his decline and unload a player being paid elite salary to deliver mediocre performance. Third, he performs to average levels (no star but a reasonable contributor). Then considered a mutually beneficial trade maybe slightly in the Saints favour. Whatever the outcome it will be watched closely by the AFL community!
Sent from my SM-G965F using TapatalkLast edited by stevoswan; 12 October 2018, 04:03 PM.Comment
-
I think this is clearly the case, and we won't misuse him as a halfback like North did.Something that I just thought about, Ryan Clarke apparently has great running power (like Hanners), can win his own ball (like Hanners), is cheap (unlike Hanners) and is fit and healthy (also unlike Hanners). Perhaps this is more a Clarke for Hanners trade than a Clarke for Rohan trade.Comment
-
Well, it beats the negative bleating that dominates this thread at the moment......Now that Hogan is staying at the Demons, they won't be chasing Stephen May (so they said anyway).
Which means the Wobbles are a top chance to secure May if he decides to move...You'd think
Which in turn means Langdon will be more expendable to the Wobbles...You'd think.
Which in turn enhances our chance of securing Langdon....You'd think.
I'm searching for some positives out of today, and this is the best I can come up with.Comment
-
I think we are now in the position we can only just scrape together the picks/points for Blakey and Langdon.
Touch and go. Unless the Pis are willing to take Saints 2019 2nd rounder for Langdon - probably pick 20-25.
In that case we can get Langdon, Blakey and another good kid in the 2nd round.
- - - Updated - - -
Would 18 + 26 get May? Equivalent of a pick 6-7. Seems fair to me.Now that Hogan is staying at the Demons, they won't be chasing Stephen May (so they said anyway).
Which means the Wobbles are a top chance to secure May if he decides to move...You'd think
Which in turn means Langdon will be more expendable to the Wobbles...You'd think.
Which in turn enhances our chance of securing Langdon....You'd think.
I'm searching for some positives out of today, and this is the best I can come up with.
Let GC decide if they would prefer 26 now or Saints 2019 2nd rounder.Comment
-
Hoping we somehow manage to get Langdon with our pick 40 to help ease the loss of our pick 28 with Hannebery, but doubt it. Still don't know if Langdon wants to leave Pies anyhow.Now that Hogan is staying at the Demons, they won't be chasing Stephen May (so they said anyway).
Which means the Wobbles are a top chance to secure May if he decides to move...You'd think
Which in turn means Langdon will be more expendable to the Wobbles...You'd think.
Which in turn enhances our chance of securing Langdon....You'd think.
I'm searching for some positives out of today, and this is the best I can come up with.Comment
-
Wouldn't shock me if Dan got back to his old fitness levels. The aspect that had totally dropped off for me was his disposal - never an elite ball user, it got to the point where you'd look away when he had the ball, often when he was under little pressure. It's tough to see how that is going to change.I find the HPN analysis interesting and there certainly is a lot of merit in their system. It does produce some strange anomolies however, like Jake Lloyd being valued higher than Jeremy McGovern and Callum Sinclair being rated the league's 3rd best ruckman after Grundy and Gawn.
Stats are useful and something to hang your hat on, but it doesn't tell the whole story.
There was always a question about how Hanners should be valued, as well as how he was actually valued by the 2 clubs in the trade. Now we know that he wasn't valued very highly. The Saints took the part of an Insurance company by assuming the risk on Hannebery and we paid (very roughly speaking) around 1000 value points betting that Hanners wouldn't return to form by taking what appears about the net value lost from an in-form Hanners. The Saints assumed huge cost in signing Hanners for 5 years at roughly his current salary.
Nevertheless, the Saints have got someone who has bled for his team every time he's pulled a jumper on - he'll always be a beloved Swans warrior in my mind.Comment
-
Not the end of the world if nothing more happens. What we need is more luck with injuries and natural improvement from our young players. Also, the rookie Draft, where we have been absolute masters of, is still to come- Lloyd, Smith, Grundy, Rampe, Ronke, Papley, Jack, and that's just off the top of my head.Comment
-
That does sound fair, but wouldn't surprise me if GC demand more like pick 18 & their 2019 1st round. I'm clinging to the hope we could land Langdon for one of our later picks (38 or 40) if Pies need to offload him in order to fit May into their salary cap. May hasn't also yet officially requested to be traded.I think we are now in the position we can only just scrape together the picks/points for Blakey and Langdon.
Touch and go. Unless the Pis are willing to take Saints 2019 2nd rounder for Langdon - probably pick 20-25.
In that case we can get Langdon, Blakey and another good kid in the 2nd round.
- - - Updated - - -
Would 18 + 26 get May? Equivalent of a pick 6-7. Seems fair to me.
Let GC decide if they would prefer 26 now or Saints 2019 2nd rounder.Comment
-
I’m calling it now. After our mostly dud trades so far & so much productive activity at nearly every other club, I reckon we have a BIG fish hidden away until other clubs are too committed with lists & finances to stop us. I’ll be clinging to this until 830pm WednesdayComment
-
Jackson McRae? There was a unreliable twitter rumour we are chasing him.
But there's more chance St. Kilda will hand back our pick 28 than that happening!
Applaud your resolve though!
Last edited by KSAS; 12 October 2018, 05:11 PM.Comment
-


Comment