2021 trading, drafting and list management: players and personnel

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ludwig
    Veterans List
    • Apr 2007
    • 9359

    Originally posted by rb4x
    I think you have got that one wrong Ludwig. The alternative candidate was Malachy.
    Delisted!

    Comment

    • joeykanga
      Warming the Bench
      • Jul 2019
      • 361

      Originally posted by Ludwig
      Delisted!
      Thats what I thought you said ! ! I thought Malachy had a chance at a career with the swans ..I predicted it a few post before he was delisted

      Comment

      • Roadrunner
        Senior Player
        • Jan 2018
        • 1452

        Originally posted by joeykanga
        Thats what I thought you said ! ! I thought Malachy had a chance at a career with the swans ..I predicted it a few post before he was delisted
        What made you think that, Joey? His physique?

        Comment

        • Markwebbos
          Veterans List
          • Jul 2016
          • 7186

          SEN alleging JD has chosen the Crows.

          https://www.sen.com.au/news/2021/09/19/why-landing-dawson-could-be-so-big-for-the-crows/

          Comment

          • mcs
            Travelling Swannie!!
            • Jul 2007
            • 8150

            Originally posted by Markwebbos
            SEN alleging JD has chosen the Crows.

            Why landing Dawson could be so “big” for the Crows
            "It was reported last Friday that Dawson had met with the Crows’ football director Mark Ricciuto and even undertaken a medical ahead of a possible shift, indicating that perhaps Adelaide had won the race over their local rivals."

            Not really very strong evidence of anything at all at this point in time - given he met with the crows first, prior to meeting with port

            They may well win the race, but that is nothing but pretty idle speculation based on not very much at this point in time.
            "You get the feeling that like Monty Python's Black Knight, the Swans would regard amputation as merely a flesh wound."

            Comment

            • The Runner
              Regular in the Side
              • May 2017
              • 718

              Originally posted by Markwebbos
              SEN alleging JD has chosen the Crows.

              Why landing Dawson could be so “big” for the Crows
              They're basing it on him having dinner with the crows leadership group.
              I don't see how he has a major say in where he goes. He's chosen Adelaide, and it's up to the Swans to get the best deal out of the two clubs there. If Adelaide can't get a good enough offer, then it's Port. Or he can risk the draft and end up in the Gold Coast.

              Comment

              • bandwagon
                Regular in the Side
                • May 2003
                • 523

                I was hoping it would be Port, just because pick 16 would be a realistic trade. I think Dawson is worth a 1st and 2nd round pick, but Port don't have a 2nd rounder.
                Adelaide are very unlikely to part with pick 4, but they do have pick 23 & pick 37. Those two picks should be enough to get the Bulldog's pick 17, but i'd prefer to take the 23 and their 2022 2nd round pick.

                Comment

                • Markwebbos
                  Veterans List
                  • Jul 2016
                  • 7186

                  Originally posted by bandwagon
                  I was hoping it would be Port, just because pick 16 would be a realistic trade. I think Dawson is worth a 1st and 2nd round pick, but Port don't have a 2nd rounder.
                  Adelaide are very unlikely to part with pick 4, but they do have pick 23 & pick 37. Those two picks should be enough to get the Bulldog's pick 17, but i'd prefer to take the 23 and their 2022 2nd round pick.
                  We could demand the Crows split their pick 4, or give us a future first rounder ... I would imagine picks next year will be worth more than picks this year. It would suit Crows to do the deal in future picks, but its much riskier.

                  There was an article on SEN The five players former recruiter thinks Power should consider trading

                  Which listed Darcy Byrne-Jones, Dan Houston, Kane Farrell, Todd Marshall and Sam Hayes as players Port should look to offload. I wonder if there will be a player involved as well as picks if he goes to Port.

                  Comment

                  • barry
                    Veterans List
                    • Jan 2003
                    • 8499

                    I dont mind Todd Marshall. If they get Findlayson, Marshall will be surplus to requirements, and he's only 22.

                    - - - Updated - - -

                    Post Buddy, I think we should make the grand father offer to Aaron Naugton (bulldogs). He's very young and the most dominant forward in the comp by a long way.
                    He could bring back the 100 goal full forward from extinction.

                    Comment

                    • lwjoyner
                      Regular in the Side
                      • Nov 2004
                      • 947

                      i wtill think if hes chosn crows we should swap our 12 for their 4 and swap maybe our 31 for their 23 and 37 I am not sure how many points that is .

                      Comment

                      • Aprilbr
                        Senior Player
                        • Oct 2016
                        • 1803

                        If its true that he has chosen Adelaide, its interesting that he would go for a Club that seems way off contending than one down the road that is right in the premiership window. Adelaide must be offering a much better deal than Port.

                        Comment

                        • Markwebbos
                          Veterans List
                          • Jul 2016
                          • 7186

                          Originally posted by barry
                          I dont mind Todd Marshall. If they get Findlayson, Marshall will be surplus to requirements, and he's only 22.

                          - - - Updated - - -

                          Post Buddy, I think we should make the grand father offer to Aaron Naugton (bulldogs). He's very young and the most dominant forward in the comp by a long way.
                          He could bring back the 100 goal full forward from extinction.
                          I do worry, quite a lot about his hair. He'd have to do something about that first.

                          Two relative cheapies: I thought Cooper Sharman was very impressive against us the other week ... and Jake Riccardi started extremely well. Not as Buddy replacements but as 2nd or 3rd talls.

                          Comment

                          • Ludwig
                            Veterans List
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 9359

                            Originally posted by Markwebbos

                            Two relative cheapies: I thought Cooper Sharman was very impressive against us the other week ... and Jake Riccardi started extremely well. Not as Buddy replacements but as 2nd or 3rd talls.
                            As for now, I think we should be going into next season backing Logan becoming a dominant forward. With McLean and Amartey both showing promise, there's no need to jump for another tall forward just yet. We get at least another year of Buddy to help with development. We also have Gould and O'Connor in early development, so there's another 2 who fill some roles next year if they come along.

                            I can't see the Saints letting Sharman go. He's been a revelation. And with Finlayson looking to leave the Giants, Ricdardi is not likely to be on the move.

                            I don't think we should be in the player market this year, but rather get the TPP in order and get ready to have a go at the meat market next year.

                            I would like to see us take Paddy McCartin and take a couple of KPPs in the draft.

                            It's easy to get into trouble over-committing before the time is right. Next year, we should have a stronger hand.

                            I don't think we're in a good position to demand anything in a trade with the Crows. I would be satisfied with the Crows' 2nd round picks from this year and next. 23 and 37 seems low.

                            Comment

                            • stevoswan
                              Veterans List
                              • Sep 2014
                              • 8546

                              Originally posted by Ludwig
                              As for now, I think we should be going into next season backing Logan becoming a dominant forward. With McLean and Amartey both showing promise, there's no need to jump for another tall forward just yet. We get at least another year of Buddy to help with development. We also have Gould and O'Connor in early development, so there's another 2 who fill some roles next year if they come along.

                              I can't see the Saints letting Sharman go. He's been a revelation. And with Finlayson looking to leave the Giants, Ricdardi is not likely to be on the move.

                              I don't think we should be in the player market this year, but rather get the TPP in order and get ready to have a go at the meat market next year.

                              I would like to see us take Paddy McCartin and take a couple of KPPs in the draft.

                              It's easy to get into trouble over-committing before the time is right. Next year, we should have a stronger hand.

                              I don't think we're in a good position to demand anything in a trade with the Crows. I would be satisfied with the Crows' 2nd round picks from this year and next. 23 and 37 seems low.
                              This is a great post. I agree with holding off on a big KPF signing, adding McCartin to the mix and further developing what we already have.....then assessing our needs in this area at 2022 season's end. By then we will have cleared more cap space as well.

                              Comment

                              • Markwebbos
                                Veterans List
                                • Jul 2016
                                • 7186

                                Originally posted by Ludwig
                                As for now, I think we should be going into next season backing Logan becoming a dominant forward. With McLean and Amartey both showing promise, there's no need to jump for another tall forward just yet. We get at least another year of Buddy to help with development. We also have Gould and O'Connor in early development, so there's another 2 who fill some roles next year if they come along.

                                I can't see the Saints letting Sharman go. He's been a revelation. And with Finlayson looking to leave the Giants, Ricdardi is not likely to be on the move.

                                I don't think we should be in the player market this year, but rather get the TPP in order and get ready to have a go at the meat market next year.

                                I would like to see us take Paddy McCartin and take a couple of KPPs in the draft.

                                It's easy to get into trouble over-committing before the time is right. Next year, we should have a stronger hand.

                                I don't think we're in a good position to demand anything in a trade with the Crows. I would be satisfied with the Crows' 2nd round picks from this year and next. 23 and 37 seems low.
                                I agree with the general thrust of what you are saying, particularly about the TPP.

                                However, I but don't think having one more KPF would be a bad thing... If we lose Reid and Sinkers wouldn't mind two replacements, one genuine ruck and one KPF.

                                Riccardi is out of contract and could therefore be prised from GW$ relatively cheaply...

                                I also read somewhere today that WCE may be pushing Brander out because of their own salary cap problems.

                                As this is not a sellers year, we may be able to get a real bargain

                                I'd say Carlton getting Hewett for nothing is a bargain, although I just had the thought. We don't need to talk to him about a new contract, we just have to match whatever Carlton offer ...
                                Last edited by Markwebbos; 20 September 2021, 02:15 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...