Match Thread. Swans v Geelong.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • chalbilto
    Senior Player
    • Oct 2007
    • 1139

    What Richo, the ABC or other media commentators have to acknowledge is the umpire has clearly said "touched, touched play on" all they have to do is listen to a replay of the final minutes of the game. It would be great if the AFL issue a statement verifying this fact and end all conjecture.

    Comment

    • KSAS
      Senior Player
      • Mar 2018
      • 1813

      +1 Hickey's exceeding performances is a throwback to when we first recruited JPK.

      On a sad note, just read of former Geelong's President Frank Costa's passing this morning, who help turn the club's fortune around In big way.

      Comment

      • stevoswan
        Veterans List
        • Sep 2014
        • 8576

        Originally posted by Bangalore Swans
        My personal view is that many Swans supporters are becoming too AFL focused and are fostering this mentality that the Victorian AFL clubs and the AFL are against them. The AFL gave the Swans Ron Barassi and a chance to keep operating in the early 90s when crowds were empty, sponsorship was low and the team was losing 20 games in a row.

        In the words of John Rambo or Frozen

        “Let it go”. “Let it go”
        Mate, after the 2016 GF.....we will NOT "let it go". It just ain't gonna happen.

        Comment

        • MattW
          Veterans List
          • May 2011
          • 4236

          Originally posted by stevoswan
          My thoughts exactly.....and as for the apparent 'howler' that the media is banging on about, I was disappointed to see on The Offsiders on the usually factual ABC this morning that they too were banging on about whether the kick went 15 metres! Do your effing research Offsiders and deal with facts! The ball (and the call) was 'touched'. Frustrating that so many want to diminish our teams achievement.
          Offsiders used to be a staple for me, but I tend to miss it now unless Caroline Wilson is on. I generally find the analysis shallow and the takes piping.

          Comment

          • stevoswan
            Veterans List
            • Sep 2014
            • 8576

            Originally posted by Goal Sneak
            In the final seconds RB was very lucky and seemed to be assuming he would get a free for the high shot. Ump didn't see it that way.

            If the siren hadn't sounded when it did, I think the ump may have paid holding the ball, mainly due to there being no attempt to clear it out. 1 or 2 more seconds and I'm sure he would've been pinged for holding the ball.
            A touch negative and now irrelevant. RB should have received a free for high contact. Move on.

            - - - Updated - - -

            Originally posted by KSAS
            +1 Hickey's exceeding performances is a throwback to when we first recruited JPK.

            On a sad note, just read of former Geelong's President Frank Costa's passing this morning, who help turn the club's fortune around In big way.
            That is sad news. Lovely bloke.

            Comment

            • Hotpotato
              Senior Player
              • Jun 2014
              • 2285

              The game (on a knife edge, admittedly towards the end) , the crowd , the noise , the intensity , it was all like a semi final .
              Just a memorable electrifying night at the footy .

              The Public address noise is a health (hearing) hazard ...

              Then they turn on the sprinklers just at the start of KtoK on the outside ground . WTF !

              Comment

              • crackedactor 01
                Regular in the Side
                • Jun 2020
                • 761

                Great effort by the boys and has to be one of our best wins. I admit I was disgusted by our first quarter effort and was ready to turn off the TV and read a book. Fantastic effort and I ask you, is T Hickey the recruit of the year?? The only down side was the poor form of Isaac Heeney. Maybe best to give him a rest with his broken hand. He gave us nothing last night.

                Comment

                • Meg
                  Go Swannies!
                  Site Admin
                  • Aug 2011
                  • 4828

                  Originally posted by stevoswan
                  A touch negative and now irrelevant. RB should have received a free for high contact. Move on.
                  I don’t think so, Rowbottom ducked and drove his head into Selwood. That won’t be called high contact. Rowbottom/we were saved by the siren. I reckon one more second and he would have been penalised for HTB as he was making no attempt to dispose. Nice to have some good fortune at the end!

                  Comment

                  • crackedactor 01
                    Regular in the Side
                    • Jun 2020
                    • 761

                    Originally posted by Meg
                    I don’t think so, Rowbottom ducked and drove his head into Selwood. That won’t be called high contact. Rowbottom/we were saved by the siren. I reckon one more second and he would have been penalised for HTB as he was making no attempt to dispose. Nice to have some good fortune at the end!
                    Sorry Meg disagree. If you look at the game there was a few ducking of the heads and it was always paid as a high tackle. So given the previous assessments, it could have easily been a head high contact. But it is nice to have some good fortune at the end.!!

                    Comment

                    • Goal Sneak
                      Out of Bounds on the Full
                      • Jun 2006
                      • 653

                      Originally posted by Meg
                      I don’t think so, Rowbottom ducked and drove his head into Selwood. That won’t be called high contact. Rowbottom/we were saved by the siren. I reckon one more second and he would have been penalised for HTB as he was making no attempt to dispose. Nice to have some good fortune at the end!
                      I agree, I think the Umpire got it right on both counts. It wasn't a high tackle and wasn't quite long enough for holding the ball. Completely saved by the siren, it's great to have some luck in those critical moments

                      Comment

                      • stevoswan
                        Veterans List
                        • Sep 2014
                        • 8576

                        Originally posted by Meg
                        I don’t think so, Rowbottom ducked and drove his head into Selwood. That won’t be called high contact. Rowbottom/we were saved by the siren. I reckon one more second and he would have been penalised for HTB as he was making no attempt to dispose. Nice to have some good fortune at the end!
                        Before the main tackle, he received contact to his head as Selwood came in to tackle him. Clear as day. Diving in to grab the ball is not 'ducking'. Then Selwood had both his legs wrapped around RB's head, ie: clearly he's being tackled above the shoulders.....illegally. It matters little now anyway and the match result was the correct one.

                        Comment

                        • rb4x
                          Regular in the Side
                          • Dec 2007
                          • 969

                          Henderson's kick to Miers for his first goal was probably not even ten meters yet mark was played. Close paid a free against Lloyd for a goal was clearly also an umpiring mistake. Two goals the Cats should not have got. Enjoyed the win and watched it again with a clear head today. Great win. Hickey is a total revelation. Seems to to really enjoy playing. Smiling all the time with a knee that would be giving him some pain.

                          Comment

                          • Blood Fever
                            Veterans List
                            • Apr 2007
                            • 4055

                            Originally posted by rb4x
                            Henderson's kick to Miers for his first goal was probably not even ten meters yet mark was played. Close paid a free against Lloyd for a goal was clearly also an umpiring mistake. Two goals the Cats should not have got. Enjoyed the win and watched it again with a clear head today. Great win. Hickey is a total revelation. Seems to to really enjoy playing. Smiling all the time with a knee that would be giving him some pain.
                            Free paid against Melican early that resulted in a goal was also rubbish. Thought Melican was outstanding until injured.

                            Comment

                            • dejavoodoo44
                              Veterans List
                              • Apr 2015
                              • 8738

                              Originally posted by rb4x
                              Henderson's kick to Miers for his first goal was probably not even ten meters yet mark was played. Close paid a free against Lloyd for a goal was clearly also an umpiring mistake. Two goals the Cats should not have got. Enjoyed the win and watched it again with a clear head today. Great win. Hickey is a total revelation. Seems to to really enjoy playing. Smiling all the time with a knee that would be giving him some pain.
                              Yes, the free against Lloyd was a howler. Seemed to make contact entirely with the ball. Maybe a bit with Close's hand: which is totally legal. Close's other goal in that quarter, could easily have been a free to McCartin, because Hawkins put his hand in his back and pushed him under the ball. An action lauded by the commentary team as great team play.

                              Comment

                              • dejavoodoo44
                                Veterans List
                                • Apr 2015
                                • 8738

                                Originally posted by Markwebbos
                                The ABC also made the mistake of saying the umpire had called “play on, not 15” and they are meant to be accurate (I work for them).

                                It all comes back to Richo who got it half right.

                                If the umpire called play on as soon as it was kicked (which he did) then it was never going to be a mark.

                                End of the matter.

                                What do people make of that result? We were slaughtered statistically. In the second quarter I think we had 8 inside 50s for 5 goals 1. We only really got on top in Q3.

                                Getting some more players back (especially the Great Dane) would help against the Dees.

                                Was Mills playing back because of his defending or his leadership? I’m hoping return of Rampe would release him back to the midfield.

                                Can we all admit Hickey has exceeded our expectations by 1000%. Think the club needs to sell Wild Man Wigs.

                                According to the AFL, Cats benched Stanley as Hickey was destroying him and had to move Blicavs into the ruck

                                Hickey v Gawn should be quite the battle.
                                I think statistical imbalance, was pretty well all down to a poor first quarter. The rest of the game was more or less even, stats wise, and we won the other three quarters, largely due to greater forward half efficiency.

                                Maybe a Hickey fan club? The Tom Tom Club?

                                Comment

                                Working...