AFL (non-Swans) off-season moves - 2022 edition
Collapse
X
-
-
This is an excellent post and raises many of the concerns about the current draft/salary cap/trade situation that I also have had for some time.
Many respected people in the industry argued at the time of the introduction of free agency, that it would heavily favour a few big clubs over the rest and that is exactly what has transpired. In demand players have much more power than ever before and they are increasingly using it! The AFL is scared of legal challenges based on restraint of trade so they will not abolish it now.
However, our system can be improved to somewhat restore equalisation. I see the three major problems being:
1. An imbalance of players coming from just one State, 60% from Victoria on average.
2. Developing clubs being at a competitive disadvantage in non-AFL States.
3. Salary caps undermined by deals outside of the Cap.
1. This is the hardest to overcome and requires continued investment in, and support for, Academies, junior development and retention allowances.
2. Similar solutions to 1. Brisbane and the Swans seem fairly settled now so its GWS and the Suns that need the most help in terms of player retention. We needed that help in the 90s and got it.
3. Much more stringent enforcement of the Cap by significantly investing in surveillance of clubs and player payments. Forensic accountants could use their magic to uncover rorts and side deals. There appears to be systematic rorting of the Cap going on by some Clubs . It needs to be identified and punished. The AFL knows what each player is paid under the official Cap. Those players who clearly are being under-paid relative to their market worth are where the investigators should start. Look at bank records, tax returns, property titles etc. Players will need to agree in their contracts that they are subject to these investigations just like a bank makes you sign a waiver for it to investigate you before lending money to you. Close relatives, girlfriends etc also need to be investigated although that's a little harder legally. I would also toughen up the rules on marketing deals, especially where club sponsors are involved. A lot of rorting going on there too!
The AFL could not give a @@@@e.? As long as GWS & GCS don't fold. But the problem is they are eventually going to fold. Because they just feed the other clubs, their chances of winning a premiership are slim. GWS got to the GF but we all know what happened. This year was a repeat of a Sydney club in that position. I think the AFL has been run, much like all political parties, on short term thinking. Short term solutions to long term problems. There is not a real equalisation plan. There is a plan that they introduced then stuffed by next year introducing Free Agency. That has killed equalisation completely.
The salary cap situation needs an investigation by a team, not one, of Forensic Accountants. I think what some of the clubs are doing might actually be in breach of the Trade Practices Act as well. For instance, if an industry is controlled by a cadre to the detriment of the other players in the industry, that is illegal. In other words they have created an uneven playing field. ICAC might want to know about this.
Sent from my JAT-L29 using TapatalkComment
-
I watched segments of the last few hours of Trade Radio on Wednesday. The thing I found most annoying was the continual justification and sentiment for the 'go home' factor. Especially true for Steve Silvani, but Matty Lloyd was also doing his part. This is followed up by even more commentary and articles written which are sympathetic to players wanting to go home and the strong pull of family. I can't think of a single condemnation of the practice; only some calls for making it harder to leave, like longer contracts for draftees, which just sets up the colonized club to invest more resources in a player who will still leave.
I will add another suggestion to the ones already posted on finding a solution to the player retention problem at expansion clubs, and in general for addressing the go home factor.
If you leave your club crying 'I want to go home to my mummy' or something similar, you should have to wear a patch on your jumper for the rest of your career which identifies you as a mummy's boy. Maybe something like this:
Comment
-
Comment
-
Yep, that's what I was thinking. To fire him just three months after he got a new contract. Something is amiss.Comment
-
Not quite correct, he was OOC and the Saints board was slow in getting a new contract to him.
Meanwhile Freo swooped and two years later could have won the flag, except for the woeful kicking for goal of Nat Fyfe
- - - Updated - - -
Harley has too much integrity to be head of the VFL.Comment
-
Disqualify. You obviously did not read the @@@@e about him from the Banking Royal Commission. Robbing, yes stealing, money from bank customers in the form of fees that didn't exist or were illegal. He could very easily have landed in gaol. Probably should have.? He created one of the biggest financial scams in the history of banking. All at the expense of NAB customers.
Sent from my JAT-L29 using Tapatalk
Gesendet von iPad mit TapatalkComment
Comment