Tend to agree. Although I suppose there's a couple of arguments for compensation. Firstly, players are more likely to be attracted to traditionally powerful clubs, so maybe it helps the weaker clubs that lose those players? Also, NSW and Queensland might be more affected by the go home factor, so it possibly lessens the blow of losing players? Whether it plays out like that in the real world, I don't know? I mean, I suspect that the go home factor is more likely to strike 2 or 3 years into a contract, rather than after 8 years at a club.
And as you say, what is North actually being compensated for? They drafted him with pick 21 in 2015, so they've had a reasonable return on that pick. And I'm not sure how missing out on the playing time between restricted free agent and unrestricted free agent, equates to a pick 3 for North, when he was originally drafted with pick 21? Like, it's not as if he's set the AFL world on fire. During that time, he's played 71 games for 8 wins, averaged just over 10 possessions a game, has not made an All Australian team, has not placed in North's B & F and hasn't even collected a Brownlow vote.
There's also the suspicion that the compensation rules are being manipulated, with clubs heavily front ending contracts, in order to trigger higher compensation. There's actually been a bit of chatter, that North might be willing to trade that pick 3 to Essendon. Which if true, seems like something that the AFL probably should nip in the bud.
And as you say, what is North actually being compensated for? They drafted him with pick 21 in 2015, so they've had a reasonable return on that pick. And I'm not sure how missing out on the playing time between restricted free agent and unrestricted free agent, equates to a pick 3 for North, when he was originally drafted with pick 21? Like, it's not as if he's set the AFL world on fire. During that time, he's played 71 games for 8 wins, averaged just over 10 possessions a game, has not made an All Australian team, has not placed in North's B & F and hasn't even collected a Brownlow vote.
There's also the suspicion that the compensation rules are being manipulated, with clubs heavily front ending contracts, in order to trigger higher compensation. There's actually been a bit of chatter, that North might be willing to trade that pick 3 to Essendon. Which if true, seems like something that the AFL probably should nip in the bud.

Comment