2023 List Management

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • barry
    Veterans List
    • Jan 2003
    • 8499

    Would we do a straight swap of Brodie Grundy for ladhams. Demons want a forward who can ruck. We want a pure ruckman. Ladhams fits the bill for them.

    Comment

    • gloveski
      Senior Player
      • Jan 2003
      • 1018

      Originally posted by MattW
      Agreed. If they consider Reid is a good chance of playing next year, we should sign him. Last time he played he was better than Amartey is now.
      Cant argue with that


      Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

      Comment

      • gloveski
        Senior Player
        • Jan 2003
        • 1018

        How about Stephens and our second round pick from Hawthorn for Thomas ? Think Thomas could be elite in our environment


        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

        Comment

        • liz
          Veteran
          Site Admin
          • Jan 2003
          • 16733

          Originally posted by gloveski
          How about Stephens and our second round pick from Hawthorn for Thomas ? Think Thomas could be elite in our environment


          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
          Thomas has announced he is staying at North Melbourne, at least for now.

          My guess (and it is purely a guess) is that Thomas and his manager were seeking a long term deal from a club at money equivalent to what he is currently on. It was reported that the Swans enquired about him last year but were put off by the healthy size of his contract - estimated (by someone, not sure who) to be around $700k pa. That sounds like a player reaping the early rewards of potential at a club with not many places to spend its salary cap. His best is superb but he has produced it sporadically.

          Add in the off-field issues, and no club (including North) in their right mind would give him a long-term, highly paid contract. When he and his manager realised this, I suspect they came to the conclusion that his best bet was to see out his contract next year and then find out if any club (including North) is of the mind to give him that long term deal. Even if his off-field is exemplary for the next 12 months, I think he will remain a perceived risk. Not only for the off-field potential hazards but a question over whether he will apply himself onfield to his best ability if he has the security of a long-term, lucrative contract.

          Comment

          • Auntie.Gerald
            Veterans List
            • Oct 2009
            • 6474

            Jack Ginnivan 2022 AFL Highlights - YouTube

            Still my preference if we are trying to find 30 or 40 goals and would not cost the earth for a trade

            Pies will be in trouble mid next year fitting everyone in the cap

            Jack kicks it a long way and at the SCG could send them from outside the arc at will

            Sneaky 185cm who can post up and lead

            That would give us Heeney, Hayward, Paps and Primetime as small medium leading players !!!

            Prime time Ginnivan for an early pick in the 20s or a late first round? ????????
            "be tough, only when it gets tough"

            Comment

            • stevoswan
              Veterans List
              • Sep 2014
              • 8543

              Originally posted by MattW
              Agreed. If they consider Reid is a good chance of playing next year, we should sign him. Last time he played he was better than Amartey is now.
              Exactly.....when he is fit and firing he's one of the handiest forwards/swingmen in the league. A real talent.

              Comment

              • Blood Fever
                Veterans List
                • Apr 2007
                • 4040

                Fit and firing too few and far between

                Comment

                • Thunder Shaker
                  Aut vincere aut mori
                  • Apr 2004
                  • 4150

                  Originally posted by Auntie.Gerald
                  Jack Ginnivan 2022 AFL Highlights - YouTube

                  Still my preference if we are trying to find 30 or 40 goals and would not cost the earth for a trade

                  Pies will be in trouble mid next year fitting everyone in the cap
                  Say what you like about Collingwood, but at least they are honest enough to trade players as needed to keep within the salary cap, unlike certain other clubs.

                  Originally posted by Auntie.Gerald
                  Jack kicks it a long way and at the SCG could send them from outside the arc at will

                  Sneaky 185cm who can post up and lead

                  That would give us Heeney, Hayward, Paps and Primetime as small medium leading players !!!

                  Prime time Ginnivan for an early pick in the 20s or a late first round? ????????
                  If Ginnivan satisfies the no-dheads rule then by all means he should be considered. I didn't like him at first, but he has matured as a player. Imagine him and Papley in the same forward line.
                  "Unbelievable!" -- Nick Davis leaves his mark on the 2005 semi final

                  Comment

                  • stevoswan
                    Veterans List
                    • Sep 2014
                    • 8543

                    Originally posted by Auntie.Gerald
                    Jack Ginnivan 2022 AFL Highlights - YouTube

                    Still my preference if we are trying to find 30 or 40 goals and would not cost the earth for a trade

                    Pies will be in trouble mid next year fitting everyone in the cap

                    Jack kicks it a long way and at the SCG could send them from outside the arc at will

                    Sneaky 185cm who can post up and lead

                    That would give us Heeney, Hayward, Paps and Primetime as small medium leading players !!!

                    Prime time Ginnivan for an early pick in the 20s or a late first round? ????????
                    I would hate to see him at our club. Doubt he fits the clubs 'no dickhead' policy.....plus I have a personal prejudice against the name Ginnivan after my experiences playing against his father and uncle back in the 80's in the MCDFL.....but that's just me.

                    Seriously though, he would have to pull his really big head in if he was to play for the Swans.

                    I don't doubt we could make him do that though should the unlikely happen and he came to our club.

                    - - - Updated - - -

                    Originally posted by Blood Fever
                    Fit and firing too few and far between
                    True but he is due for an 'on' season. I still reckon he's worth the obvious risk.

                    Comment

                    • longmile
                      Crumber
                      • Apr 2011
                      • 3360

                      Originally posted by Auntie.Gerald
                      Jack Ginnivan 2022 AFL Highlights - YouTube

                      Still my preference if we are trying to find 30 or 40 goals and would not cost the earth for a trade

                      Pies will be in trouble mid next year fitting everyone in the cap

                      Jack kicks it a long way and at the SCG could send them from outside the arc at will

                      Sneaky 185cm who can post up and lead

                      That would give us Heeney, Hayward, Paps and Primetime as small medium leading players !!!

                      Prime time Ginnivan for an early pick in the 20s or a late first round? ????????
                      I was so against this when it was raised previously as I think hes a nob but seeing how much of a cult star he is for the Pies and how much they love him it would be fun taking them from him.

                      In saying that I think hes a pretty passionate Pies guy and I dont know if we have a shortage of small/med forwards?

                      Comment

                      • Markwebbos
                        Veterans List
                        • Jul 2016
                        • 7186

                        Originally posted by barry
                        Would we do a straight swap of Brodie Grundy for ladhams. Demons want a forward who can ruck. We want a pure ruckman. Ladhams fits the bill for them.
                        I reckon that's not a bad deal for either side ...

                        On Stephens, he's had a lot of opportunity and hasn't looked up to it, which is a big shame. I think he's out the door and really hope that he doesn't "do an Aliir" at North. We won't get much for him sadly.

                        Comment

                        • goswannies
                          Senior Player
                          • Sep 2007
                          • 3048

                          Originally posted by gloveski
                          How about Stephens and our second round pick from Hawthorn for Thomas ? Think Thomas could be elite in our environment


                          Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
                          He has to want to go to the Hawks. Heard today from a pretty reliable source that he is bound for the Roos (he’s agreed to North’s contract), the Swans now need to agree to trade terms to get it done

                          Comment

                          • liz
                            Veteran
                            Site Admin
                            • Jan 2003
                            • 16733

                            Originally posted by goswannies
                            He has to want to go to the Hawks. Heard today from a pretty reliable source that he is bound for the Roos (he’s agreed to North’s contract), the Swans now need to agree to trade terms to get it done
                            Under the proposal you quoted he’s be going to North (where Thomas is currently), not Hawthorn. The Hawthorn reference was to their early second round pick that we hold.

                            But that trade’s not going to happen, regardless.

                            Comment

                            • i'm-uninformed2
                              Reefer Madness
                              • Oct 2003
                              • 4653

                              So we officially start with picks 11, 22, 30, 41 and 49.

                              I’d love us to simply walk up to Gold Coast and say what’s pick 4 gonna cost, but I reckon they’ll basically run an auction on it.
                              'Delicious' is a fun word to say

                              Comment

                              • Auntie.Gerald
                                Veterans List
                                • Oct 2009
                                • 6474

                                As mentioned above……we officially start with picks 11, 22, 30, 41 and 49.

                                One scenario might be :

                                So pick 11 we will most likely go the draft with?

                                Picks 41 and 49 could we bundle to their value of pick 27ish if a team needs the points for father son or academy ?

                                So we end up with picks 11, 22, 27, 30

                                We use 27 and 30 for trades if required or we bundle 27 and 30 into their value which is pick 12ish

                                We could end up with 11and 12 for the draft and maybe pick 22 is required for a specific role trade we have identified ?

                                This is all depends on who needs points and flexibility with multiple picks and also if we can get what we want via UFA or FA etc

                                11 and 12 would have many options to go back to back with talent in the draft and probably get what we want………. and or bundle again to move into serious players ie 11 & 12 bundled equals pick 2 which no one will give up as a straight trade …. But there is opportunity
                                "be tough, only when it gets tough"

                                Comment

                                Working...